RE: Suicide: An Ethical Delimna
December 13, 2014 at 9:13 am
(This post was last modified: December 13, 2014 at 9:19 am by robvalue.)
MM, to me you seem to be jumping in and out of thinking about things from an evolution standpoint.
If you consider evolution, then everything that happens, suicide included, is part of evolution. Because evolution is what happens. It's a tautology, it's the very definition. You can't alter evolution, the environments change as a result of evolution, which evolving species then adapt to. It's a cycle. But agreed, from this point of view we are no better or worse than anything else. This is of no real worth though as an observation, because we don't make moral decisions or evaluations based on evolution.
You can only "alter" evolution if you define it in a certain way under certain conditions, such as not having the environment radically changed or DNA being messed with. But that's just one possible path evolution could take, and it's not what is really happening, so it's useless to think of it that way. That is a world without humans.
If you're not considering evolution, and I think it's pointless to do so because evolution has no aims anyway, then objectively we are fucking terrible. We screw over other species and the planet, and it would be better for all of those other species if we weren't here. Say if we came to that conclusion as a species and wiped ourselves out on purpose, then that would be objectively good for the planet and the other species. And it would still be part of evolution.
If you consider evolution, then everything that happens, suicide included, is part of evolution. Because evolution is what happens. It's a tautology, it's the very definition. You can't alter evolution, the environments change as a result of evolution, which evolving species then adapt to. It's a cycle. But agreed, from this point of view we are no better or worse than anything else. This is of no real worth though as an observation, because we don't make moral decisions or evaluations based on evolution.
You can only "alter" evolution if you define it in a certain way under certain conditions, such as not having the environment radically changed or DNA being messed with. But that's just one possible path evolution could take, and it's not what is really happening, so it's useless to think of it that way. That is a world without humans.
If you're not considering evolution, and I think it's pointless to do so because evolution has no aims anyway, then objectively we are fucking terrible. We screw over other species and the planet, and it would be better for all of those other species if we weren't here. Say if we came to that conclusion as a species and wiped ourselves out on purpose, then that would be objectively good for the planet and the other species. And it would still be part of evolution.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum