|
The catch-all gun thread
|
 Quote:Gun owners are the end of their war. It's coming, and they drew first blood. You realize, of course, that most governments have things like tanks, flamethrowers and attack aircraft, right? I think that if you and your fellow gun owners have to go up against the government, you're pretty well fucked from 'go'. Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
 RE: The catch-all gun thread
November 30, 2013 at 6:22 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2013 at 8:05 am by Nineteen.)
(November 29, 2013 at 8:25 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote: If they are not your guns then you should not have access to them unless the owner is present and knows you are competent to handle a firearm. If you have unaided access to guns that are not registered to you then the person who owns them should relinquish them immediately. No joke. No I dont touch them without my father . But I love to shoot , its so funny . He taught me how to shoot while I was 8-9 years old . here is one , I'm gonna delete after a while . deleted......  (November 29, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:They are the bulwark of liberty. Second Amendment Score: Free Republic: 240 years Tyranny: 0
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.   (November 30, 2013 at 8:59 am)Chas Wrote: Second Amendment Score: As an European, I cannot agree on that. In my eyes e.g. US health care makes your country most definitely a tyranny. When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura
It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.
But for all of you that want to voluntarily disarm yourselves, go for it. After all, when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
RE: The catch-all gun thread
November 30, 2013 at 11:34 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2013 at 11:54 am by Nineteen.)
Hey , this is another one , look at it , I'm gonna delete.
Deleted ...  (November 30, 2013 at 11:35 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: The police are part of the problem. How do you mean?
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
(November 30, 2013 at 11:29 am)Rahul Wrote: It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. Presumably, you also make sure you always have a bulletproof vest, an NBC suit, a syringe of atropine, a first aid kit, full complement of tools, etc.... I mean, it's better to have them and not need them, right? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 545504_465231863487797_933540432_n.jpg]](http://s4.photobucket.com/user/rschilla/media/545504_465231863487797_933540432_n.jpg.html)
