Posts: 29101
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 3:51 am
The thing is, if we were designed by aliens or something, there are several extremely stupid decisions that were made but ultimately we are of course rather impressive.
But if we were designed by some sort of super being who even made the rules of the reality in which we live, we are utterly laughable in just about every way.
The fact that AAA continued to go on about this observation and value judgement rather than my actual questions is rather telling.
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 6:41 am
(January 9, 2016 at 4:02 pm)AAA Wrote: (January 9, 2016 at 3:58 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Evolution does happen...so.......not exactly an assumption. You have been describing the manner in which you take issue with the theory of evolution...not the fact of evolution. What degree did you claim to be seeking, again?
Change is a fact. Natural selection is a fact. Neo-Darwinian evolution is far from fact. Saying it is a fact does not make it a fact. And biology
You just said that the evolution is a fact and then denied evolution I is confuzitated.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
110
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 7:07 am
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
110
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 7:21 am
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 9:24 am
(January 10, 2016 at 1:06 am)AAA Wrote: (January 10, 2016 at 1:00 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: The options are either you understand evolution or you don't understand it. It's not about whether you agree with it, it's not a matter of personal opinion.
So you're saying neo-Darwinian evolution is 100% fact? From a scientific standpoint, should we discourage people for questioning scientific ideas? If so, do you think this type of thinking will halt scientific progress?
I do understand it, and I think it is not the full explanation for life.
That's great. Now all you need to do is write up all your objections in a paper on the subject, then get it published in a proper peer-reviewed journal as distinct from a creationist circle-jerk one. See, what you think is actually not worth a plugged nickel compared to what you can
demonstrate. Put in the work first.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 1494
Threads: 0
Joined: July 26, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 10:56 am
AAA, why do you continue to try and poke holes in evolution, it doesn't get you any closer to proving a designer. If I where to grant you that evolution is false (which its not) and told you to lay out your case for a designer, what would it be? If your case for design is that " To me things look designed", then why should we even listen to you or take you seriously.
Posts: 29101
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 10:58 am
Indeed. Evolution or design; false dichotomy.
![[Image: 96cbf1cb56de8d012513832d664d0902.gif]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/96/cb/f1/96cbf1cb56de8d012513832d664d0902.gif)
