(March 9, 2016 at 9:57 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 9:46 am)pool the great Wrote: It's probably because of this kind of sexist thinking that women are held back from participating in these types of sports. We should encourage more women to participate in these kinds of sports by conducting campaigns. The stereotype that men are physically better than women is what is holding women back. So please stop spreading these stereotypical ideas and holding women back.

Science isn't "sexist thinking," dipshit. Also, women aren't "held back" from those sports. If anything, creating women's classes for those sports makes women more likely to participate because they don't have to deal with the intimidation of entering a pool of competitors that are by-and-large more physically apt than they are at most feats of speed and strength. Until you can bring me some science to back up all this bullshit you're vomiting, don't fucking bother me with your talk of "stereotypes." Scientific facts are not stereotypes.


See, this is why you believe in magic.

(March 9, 2016 at 9:57 am)Jenny A Wrote: Pool, are you bothered by weightism in wrestling and boxing? Because the competitors are divided into weight classes to make the sport more interesting. Some sports have a senior division. Are they ageist?

Mens and womens divisions recognize real physical,differences between men and women. Some sorts like auto racing do not have seperate divisions because physical gender differences play little or no role. Some sports, like gymnastics, even have entirely different events for men and women. There are physical reasons for that. Some sports that are traditionally divided into men's and women's divisions probably shouldn't be.

As long as the divisions are about real physical differences, I don't see any sexism. Are you bothered by being bared from playing women's soccer?

(March 9, 2016 at 10:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Then go play soccer with chicks?  Who's stopping you?

(March 9, 2016 at 10:32 am)Rhythm Wrote: Then go play soccer with some other group of chicks that want to play soccer with you? If you can find any....

(March 9, 2016 at 10:23 am)pool the great Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 9:57 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Science isn't "sexist thinking," dipshit. Also, women aren't "held back" from those sports. If anything, creating women's classes for those sports makes women more likely to participate because they don't have to deal with the intimidation of entering a pool of competitors that are by-and-large more physically apt than they are at most feats of speed and strength. Until you can bring me some science to back up all this bullshit you're vomiting, don't fucking bother me with your talk of "stereotypes." Scientific facts are not stereotypes.


See, this is why you believe in magic.

Well no, retard. Women being physically weaker than men is a stereotype, cow poop. Though you will see many examples that contradict this stereotype, four eyes. So stop spreading this stereotype, leukocytes penis

(March 9, 2016 at 10:44 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(March 9, 2016 at 10:23 am)pool the great Wrote: Well no, retard. Women being physically weaker than men is a stereotype, cow poop. Though you will see many examples that contradict this stereotype, four eyes. So stop spreading this stereotype, leukocytes penis

Four eyes? Really? You're a fucking child.

Some stereotypes are false and unfair, and others are pretty much rooted in fact. Isolated examples do not break a stereotype or a statistical fact. Your manly girlfriend does not set the bell curve for general athletic comparisons between men and women.

Furthermore, if you really cared about discrimination and stereotypes, you wouldn't insult people's intellect with words like "retard" because it reinforces the stereotype that mentally handicapped people are intellectually inferior to mentally healthy people.