Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 1:48 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2016 at 2:05 pm by I_am_not_mafia.)
(April 23, 2016 at 1:30 pm)Cecelia Wrote: (April 23, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Losty Wrote: What? The North Carolina law bans trans people from using the appropriate bathroom so what's to stop him would be that regardless of whether he is cis male or she is trans female neither are allowed in the women's restroom.
I said Trans-male, not trans-female.
A trans-male would be required (under North Carolina Law) to use the women's restroom, and not the men's restroom. Despite having the appearance of a man.
Under the North Carolina Law, if a CIS-Male so wanted to go into the women's restroom for nefarious purposes, they would merely need to claim that they are trans-male (Born female, but had reassignment surgery). (Same goes with CIS-Females and the men's room, but that takes more time to type out.).
You're right and it shows how ludicrous the law is. They're not actually bothered about making cisgendered women feel more comfortable, or even safer, it's actually an expression of their bigotry. They need people to hate and look down upon in order to feel better about who they are themselves.
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 1:50 pm
(April 23, 2016 at 1:30 pm)Cecelia Wrote: (April 23, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Losty Wrote: What? The North Carolina law bans trans people from using the appropriate bathroom so what's to stop him would be that regardless of whether he is cis male or she is trans female neither are allowed in the women's restroom.
I said Trans-male, not trans-female.
A trans-male would be required (under North Carolina Law) to use the women's restroom, and not the men's restroom. Despite having the appearance of a man.
Under the North Carolina Law, if a CIS-Male so wanted to go into the women's restroom for nefarious purposes, they would merely need to claim that they are trans-male (Born female, but had reassignment surgery). (Same goes with CIS-Females and the men's room, but that takes more time to type out.).
Lmao. Yep I missed that. It's a funny point.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 2791
Threads: 107
Joined: July 4, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:03 pm
(April 23, 2016 at 1:38 pm)Cecelia Wrote: (April 23, 2016 at 1:33 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Usually if a trans male has had reassignment surgery, they easily pass as female. I know a guy who has had the surgery and, well . . . he still looks really butch (male jaw line and adam's apple have not been altered yet) but - - most would fool you.
I think you mean trans-female.
trans-male is assigned female at birth, but identifies male.
trans-female is assigned male at birth, but identifies female.
Woops sorry. You're right. It can get confusing.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:06 pm
(April 23, 2016 at 1:33 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: (April 23, 2016 at 1:30 pm)Cecelia Wrote: I said Trans-male, not trans-female.
A trans-male would be required (under North Carolina Law) to use the women's restroom, and not the men's restroom. Despite having the appearance of a man.
Under the North Carolina Law, if a CIS-Male so wanted to go into the women's restroom for nefarious purposes, they would merely need to claim that they are trans-male (Born female, but had reassignment surgery). (Same goes with CIS-Females).
Usually if a trans male has had reassignment surgery, they easily pass as female. I know a guy who has had the surgery and, well . . . he still looks really butch (male jaw line and adam's apple have not been altered yet) but - - most would fool you.
This is a transgender man, he has a vagina, he is legally required to use the women's restroom in North Carolina.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:06 pm
The world has become very confusing.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:08 pm
(April 23, 2016 at 2:06 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: The world has become very confusing.
Wasn't it always? The only thing that has been changing, one of the select few positives, is that people talk about it now instead of brushing it under the carpet.
Posts: 2087
Threads: 65
Joined: August 30, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:16 pm
Can you imagine living 100 years ago? Can you imagine living 100 years from now? It'd be great to see the world progress even further. Who knows what leaps we'll make by then. Kind of makes me wish I was born a lot later.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:22 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2016 at 2:24 pm by robvalue.)
Stupid fuck-arse bollock factories.
So is this stupid law going to be overturned?
And how is it ever going to be enforced, unless someone knows someone else is trans and is stalking their bathroom habits? Even then, what? Call the genital police? Piss off.
These fucking pathetic whiney douchebags make me sick.
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:25 pm
(April 23, 2016 at 2:22 pm)robvalue Wrote: Stupid fuck-arse bollock factories.
So is this stupid law going to be overturned?
And how is it ever going to be enforced, unless someone knows someone else is trans and is stalking their bathroom habits? Even then, what? Call the genital police? Piss off.
These fucking pathetic whiney douchebags make me sick.
Considering the boycotting it isn't likely to last. People don't vote for politicians that throw the state's income down the drain.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Transexuals
April 23, 2016 at 2:33 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2016 at 2:37 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(April 23, 2016 at 2:06 pm)Losty Wrote: (April 23, 2016 at 1:33 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Usually if a trans male has had reassignment surgery, they easily pass as female. I know a guy who has had the surgery and, well . . . he still looks really butch (male jaw line and adam's apple have not been altered yet) but - - most would fool you.
This is a transgender man, he has a vagina, he is legally required to use the women's restroom in North Carolina.
That's Aiden Downling, whom I just used as an example in my Facebook argument with an acquaintance, on this subject... and I have to admit, he is a gooooooood looking man. I'm confident enough in my sexuality (and the potential fluidity thereof, though I've never really been interested in men) to admit that.
Of course, then there's Janet Mock, who's not only hot, but super-smart and really eloquent... ever since I saw her appear on The Daily Show, she gets my heart racing, no doubt!
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
|