(May 6, 2016 at 12:04 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Wasserman-Schultz would be the worst choice she could make, there is no way she picks her.

Boxer maybe, although if she's going for the all-female ticket, she should pick Elizabeth Warren to nab some of the less idiotic Bernie Bros.

Cory Booker for the diversity, likeability, and shore up the the moderate vote.

Hillary already said that she's going to load up on women (the lesbian thing) so there's no way she will ever pick a black guy (the Arkansas red neck thing).

Not everyone's a racist homophobe like you are, WoG. She's a politician and clearly miles ahead of you in intelligence, and there are politics to be played here.

(May 6, 2016 at 12:07 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(May 6, 2016 at 12:03 am)Sterben Wrote: I'm not being sexist ...

Says the person right before they say something sexist...

(May 6, 2016 at 12:03 am)Sterben Wrote: ...just saying that the country is not ready for a woman President and Vice-President just yet. Although, it might prove to be a very interesting social experiment. How would American voters react to a female President and a female VP ticket?

And there it is.

Social experiment? Really?!? What is the difference between a female and a male vice president? Why isn't the country 'ready' for an all female ticket?

             It would not bother me in anyway to have all female ticket, I'm talking about the masses here. We have come a long way in progression of American society, transgenders and gays have rights that have been long deserved. Woman have assumed powerful positions that were once only held men (CEO'S, congress, senators, mayors and other positions).
To answer your question, it would be too soon for a all female ticket. Point One: there is still a lot of people who would view A all female ticket would be threatening to them. Point two: Hillery would need a male VP for the percentage of voters who are still somewhat traditional. Point Three: Dealing with non-progressive male world leaders, there is a lot of them out there that even female leaders like Angela Merkel has issues dealing with based on the fact there woman. The prospect of a all female ticket be great if the candidates were qualified. I did like your thoughts on Warren has a potential choice. This is a game of political chess, let's get a female president in office first so that way society can progress further, to the point to where a all female ticket would have a higher chance to succeed.

You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three.

The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.

(May 6, 2016 at 12:30 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: there are politics to be played here.

This is why Sanders will never work as a VP to Hillary. I can't see him being willing to run with her anyways. He seems to be genuinely against her kind of politics.

(May 6, 2016 at 12:47 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three.

The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.

Franklin's ghost murders a kitten every time someone refers to a Hillary fan as a liberal.

Hmm. As long as it's not a kittencorn.

Hammy

If it comes down to hillary and trump fuck it i'm not voting for shit head 1 or shit head 2.
Fuck it.

(May 6, 2016 at 1:06 pm)dyresand Wrote: If it comes down to hillary and trump fuck it i'm not voting for shit head 1 or shit head 2.
Fuck it.

From Pharyngula, PZ Myers's blog, today

Yeah, I suppose the Supreme Court Justices TRUMP any other arguments.  Pun intended. 
I am not happy about it. I feel I will be forced to vote for Hilary, even though she is a horrible person, just because she will be more likely to nominate liberal, or at least centrist, judges.  I don't even want to think about what the Supreme Court would look like after Trump finished with it.  Scary thought.