You forgot the ROFL.

(June 5, 2016 at 11:36 pm)IATIA Wrote: You forgot the ROFL.

Give me another day or to ROFL

(June 5, 2016 at 8:03 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(June 4, 2016 at 9:13 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: dog·ma
ˈdôɡmə/
noun
noun: dogma; plural noun: dogmas
[ol]
[*]a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
"the Christian dogma of the Trinity"

Simple Definition of dogma

• : a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted
  
• : a belief or set of beliefs that is taught by a religious organization
  

[*]
dogma
 


[dawg-muh, dog-] /ˈdɔg mə, ˈdɒg-/
Spell Syllables

• Examples
  
• Word Origin
  

[*]
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun, plural dogmas or (Rare) dogmata
 

[dawg-muh-tuh] /ˈdɔg mə tə/ (Show IPA)
1.
an official system of principles or tenets concerning faith, morals, behavior, etc., as of a church.
Synonyms: doctrine, teachings, set of beliefs, philosophy.
2.
a specific tenet or doctrine authoritatively laid down, as by a church: the dogma of the Assumption;
the recently defined dogma of papal infallibility.
Synonyms: tenet, canon, law.
3.
prescribed doctrine proclaimed as unquestionably true by a particular group:
the difficulty of resisting political dogma.

[*]



I can challenge all those ideas any time any place.
No problem with that and no problem with who will came out as the winner.  

Yoga is the original while those who came later are not.
In fact most of them are bad imitations.  

You can challenge what you like Prikky, but arguing the actual definition of a word in a language you clearly don't have a full grasp of just goes to show what a dribbling fuckbag you are.

You don't understand the word dogma, much like your understanding of many things.

This is why education is so important. I've seen so many incredulous christians go down this path of scientific ignorance, trying to extinguish their ignorance by shifting it to their god. Learn some shit about the universe from science before you ask "atheists" but thank you for lumping us together. You probably just asked us because we're the group that's most trusting of our most powerful form of self-correcting empiricism.

(June 6, 2016 at 4:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(June 5, 2016 at 8:03 am)Little Rik Wrote: I can challenge all those ideas any time any place.
No problem with that and no problem with who will came out as the winner.  

Yoga is the original while those who came later are not.
In fact most of them are bad imitations.  

You can challenge what you like Prikky, but arguing the actual definition of a word in a language you clearly don't have a full grasp of just goes to show what a dribbling fuckbag you are.
You don't understand the word dogma, much like your understanding of many things.

Imbecile.  

Everything in this universe is up for change after change after change with no end in sight.
In the past the definition of the planet earth was that it was flat and was the center of the universe.
That definition however didn't last for ever.
The same thing is valid for everything else.
Most atheists say that the consciousness is a product of the brain which is also taken as a definition
by a lot of scholars.
Does that means that the number of people who agree means that that definition is correct?
Even in the past those who thought that the planet was flat were in the majority probably 99.9% majority
and yet they have been proven wrong.  

So please no bullshit son.
Definitions are only indication of today understanding not of the truth so get lost.  

(June 6, 2016 at 9:03 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(June 6, 2016 at 4:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: You can challenge what you like Prikky, but arguing the actual definition of a word in a language you clearly don't have a full grasp of just goes to show what a dribbling fuckbag you are.
You don't understand the word dogma, much like your understanding of many things.

Imbecile.  

Everything in this universe is up for change after change after change with no end in sight.
In the past the definition of the planet earth was that it was flat and was the center of the universe.
That definition however didn't last for ever.
The same thing is valid for everything else.
Most atheists say that the consciousness is a product of the brain which is also taken as a definition
by a lot of scholars.
Does that means that the number of people who agree means that that definition is correct?
Even in the past those who thought that the planet was flat were in the majority probably 99.9% majority
and yet they have been proven wrong.  

So please no bullshit son.
Definitions are only indication of today understanding not of the truth so get lost.  

Roughly translated:  I have my own language, if you do not know how to understand it, that's your problem.  Now, I am going to hang upside down above my pet tortoise and masturbate all over him....wibble.

(June 6, 2016 at 4:33 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: This is why education is so important. I've seen so many incredulous christians go down this path of scientific ignorance, trying to extinguish their ignorance by shifting it to their god. Learn some shit about the universe from science before you ask "atheists" but thank you for lumping us together. You probably just asked us because we're the group that's most trusting of our most powerful form of self-correcting empiricism.

Man no crap please.  

Empiricism relate to our senses but behind the senses there is something a lot more powerful but
in order to enter that stage
you got to do a lot of hard work   both mental and spiritual which is something that you are not doing so please
be content with the little that you got hoping that in the future you will get out the mental cage of dogmas and enter the arena of infinity.  

(June 5, 2016 at 4:28 pm)RozKek Wrote: Let's not forget when Rik contradicted himself. Check the bolded text. Speaking of evidence when he says this universe can't provide evidence for anything.

---

Little Rik Wrote:Roooooooooooooooooooz.   

You want evidence? 
In this case you will have to wait until the day you will leave your body.
That day it all will appear very clear to you.
Or maybe not.
Everything will appear dark.
Or maybe not.
Everything is gone, you are gone.
You will not know that you are gone for ever.

Unfortunately this universe does not provide evidence for anything at all.   
The reality is not here.
It can not possibly be in a space in which everything move and change by the second.
The real reality can not be affected by time and space.
It never change but why you worry so much anyway?
Just live your life and see what the future will bring.
You never know.  

---

---

Little Rik Wrote:That is bizarre Roz.
In the past i did produce a number of studies only to be told that i really should take in serious consideration the biggest study ever carried out by the best expert in the field Dr. Parnia.
Guess what Roz.
I did read Dr. Parnia report and guess what?
He conclude that there is no evidence for or against NDEs and more study is needed to find out
the truth. <bolded by RozKek>
So if the so called expert say no or yes how the hell mr. Roz can pop up and say no?

---

Now watch him ignore this post.

Tell me something son.  
What is the difference between an expert and a so called expert?  

Expert?

'Ex' is a has been and 'spurt' is a drip under pressure.

(June 6, 2016 at 9:30 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(June 5, 2016 at 4:28 pm)RozKek Wrote: Let's not forget when Rik contradicted himself. Check the bolded text. Speaking of evidence when he says this universe can't provide evidence for anything.

---

---

---

---

Now watch him ignore this post.

Tell me something son.  
What is the difference between an expert and a so called expert?  

An expert is anybody you don't agree with, on any given subject.

A so-called expert is anybody that has ever agreed with you, ever, or has ever sent you one of those self-help manuals you obviously love reading.

Easy.