Oh where has this thread turned.

(June 11, 2016 at 5:09 pm)LastPoet Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 5:00 pm)Emjay Wrote: Wow, I never knew any of this until now. It's such a shame that so many people have had an important and natural part of themselves removed, for no good reason, leaving them having to jump through all these hoops when what it should be is a perfectly easy and natural process... just grab it and rub up and down... letting the foreskin do the work of stimulating the glans.

Ah emjay. In some other place in time and space.

Wait, now I get the need of americans to lube up for masturbation. I always thought Americans were masturbating more than I did in my teen years, thats why the lube. I only got a few blisters in my youth, going dry and all that with palmita del mano derecha.

Never have I wanted to believe in the 'many worlds' interpretation of quantum physics more than I do now 

I still can't imagine using lube for it... the whole point is being able to get a grip... but with that I'm sure I'd keep hitting myself in the face 

(June 11, 2016 at 5:04 pm)Losty Wrote: You should have a look at the living options though. While generally unecessary some of them can be quite fun.

What do you mean? (If you were talking to me)

(June 11, 2016 at 9:15 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 9:00 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: What does it do? Female circumcision removes more than the skin. Do males who've been circumcised report loss of sensation? [...]

Yes - there is loss of sensation. That's the main reason, why "modern" male circumcision is performed - and most likely why it was done in ye olden times. The head of the penis, without the protection of the foreskin  becomes much less sensitive, due to years of contact with environment and lack of lubrication. That in turn is supposed to discourage masturbation and diminish sexual pleasure, which suited the puritan morality of both ancient Jews and prohibition-era Americans. And no - it doesn't work, circumcised boys still whack off, only they have to do it much harder.

I checked your facts and found:
http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/

Quote:The foreskin has twelve known functions

So I guess I'm in your camp now. Zipee dee doo dah!

(June 11, 2016 at 12:52 pm)Heatheness Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 12:32 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I've got a question related to the topic but in no way dependant on which option id vote for since I've already voted.

I keep hearing the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis but it doesn't feel that way for me, it's exactly the opposite. The head of my cock is ultra ultra sensitive, but not my foreskin at all.

Any other circumcised males feel like that?

If scientists all agree my foreskin has the most nerve endings I won't argue, it doesn't feel that's the case though with mine.  I can actually dig my nails in pretty hard on my foreskin and not feel anything but the head is a different story.

I am not a male with a penis but this is the info I have read and been given by males. The sensitive part has been removed. Not all areas of the foreskin are the same just like not areas of the labia are the same. Some more sensitive than others. If you think your glans is sensitive now after years and years of being exposed to clothing and touching how do you think it might feel if it had been protected by skin all this time?

The part that is removed has generally 20,000 more sensory cells in it than after you cut it off. 20k lovely little sexual firing pins that you just don't have anymore. Kind of like the difference between your penis head and your shaft. Just think what sex might be like if your shaft felt like your penis head feels during sex.

Sorry I made a pretty huge error in that post.  I fell asleep after posting which is why I'm only correcting it now.

I'm actually UN circumcised.  So I meant to type "Any other un circumcised males feel like that?"

So I have my full foreskin and it feels about as sensitive as the shaft, no where near as sensitive as the head.

After thinking about it though there are bits of the foreskin that are sensitive but just not in a sexual way.  Sensitive like fingertips are sensitive but not orgasm educing.

I'm still against circumcision but I don't think cutting the sensitive part of the foreskin off would reduce sensitivity in the way that some people are thinking. It's sensitive yes, but not in the same way that the head is.

The foreskin is ugly anyway. Cut it off! *Fist pump*

(June 11, 2016 at 5:37 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: The foreskin is ugly anyway.  Cut it off!  *Fist pump*

Do it to yourself, don't force it on others

(June 11, 2016 at 5:34 pm)paulpablo Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 12:52 pm)Heatheness Wrote: I am not a male with a penis but this is the info I have read and been given by males. The sensitive part has been removed. Not all areas of the foreskin are the same just like not areas of the labia are the same. Some more sensitive than others. If you think your glans is sensitive now after years and years of being exposed to clothing and touching how do you think it might feel if it had been protected by skin all this time?

The part that is removed has generally 20,000 more sensory cells in it than after you cut it off. 20k lovely little sexual firing pins that you just don't have anymore. Kind of like the difference between your penis head and your shaft. Just think what sex might be like if your shaft felt like your penis head feels during sex.

Sorry I made a pretty huge error in that post.  I fell asleep after posting which is why I'm only correcting it now.

I'm actually UN circumcised.  So I meant to type "Any other un circumcised males feel like that?"

So I have my full foreskin and it feels about as sensitive as the shaft, no where near as sensitive as the head.

After thinking about it though there are bits of the foreskin that are sensitive but just not in a sexual way.  Sensitive like fingertips are sensitive but not orgasm educing.

I'm still against circumcision but I don't think cutting the sensitive part of the foreskin off would reduce sensitivity in the way that some people are thinking.  It's sensitive yes, but not in the same way that the head is.

Get rid of that protection, and that head will be less sensitive than your shaft.

(June 11, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Do it to yourself, don't force it on others  

If I ever had a son, I would have him circumcised.

(June 11, 2016 at 5:41 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Do it to yourself, don't force it on others  

If I ever had a son, I would have him circumcised.