(June 17, 2016 at 8:05 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(June 17, 2016 at 1:52 am)Alex K Wrote: By the way, as a non-smoker, what are your thoughts on Sea Leopards?

They're DELICIOUS! But, I'm a feminist, so....

I'd respond, but as a Gemini, I have nothing to say to that.

(June 19, 2016 at 4:03 am)Dust_bunny Wrote:

(June 19, 2016 at 3:54 am)Losty Wrote: No, you were mocked because you posted a thread on a seemingly random topic and called it contraversial. Pmdd is not contraversial except maybe on tumblr.

Were you mocking me? I thought you were mocking the post. 

Athiest Forums> Science> life sciences. ( psychology/hormones/feminism) and its controversial as fuck sorry.

But your comment is a pretty good example of why it is controversial so good job.

Well you know me, I'm just a major sexist against women

Dust Bunny, as an Atheist, what are your thoughts on asking someone a question about a controversial topic, based on that person's non-belief, that has nothing to do with that topic?

Why are you guys acting like the OP is making some sense?

(June 17, 2016 at 1:07 am)Dust_bunny Wrote: Apparently there is a condition hypothesized to be caused by progesterone intolerance which causes a severe form of pms called pmdd. I'd like to know what most atheists think about this because its a very controversial issue.

My atheism has nothing to do with my opinions on menstruation. As a wizard who generally finds humans icky, though, I think periods in general are devil magic. It's a kind of human blood sacrifice (since an unfertilized egg is technically a human cell with consciousness and rights), and they use the resulting evil energy to turn their fingernails wrong colors and shop for 1,000 years at a time.

(June 19, 2016 at 8:56 am)Little lunch Wrote: Dust Bunny, as an Atheist, what are your thoughts on asking someone a question about a controversial topic, based on that person's non-belief, that has nothing to do with that topic?

Firstly I wanted to see first how atheists here respond to such an issue, and sadly, found that it's no different than theists. I was hoping the intelligence factor would make a difference but no.

Secondly, I wanted to see how skeptics feel about an issue like this where when there is a medical condition with no solid evidence to support it as a hormone condition, yet by not supporting that hypothesis, by calling it a mental illness you are stigmatizing a group of woman based on their period... (a hormone induced biological function that they have little control over).

Not that anyone really gives a shit here but if you are a humanist and psychology, hormones, neurotransmitters etc interests you, do search pmdd + controversy and you might get the whole picture. 

The last post was entertaining by the way, you should consider writing a horror film

(June 20, 2016 at 1:00 am)Dust_bunny Wrote: Not that anyone really gives a shit here but if you are a humanist and psychology, hormones, neurotransmitters etc interests you, do search pmdd + controversy and you might get the whole picture. 

The last post was entertaining by the way, you should consider writing a horror film

First off, a search containing anything + controversy is going to give you biased results. The Anti-Vaxx 'movement' is a perfect example. It's the fucking internet, crazy flows through its veins.

Doing a search for PMDD in medical journals, however, gives you the actual picture.

Your haughty attitude shows your interminable arrogance. If you are an actual skeptic, you would learn how to evaluate evidence.

Agree SC, but not all dog owners feel the same way.

(June 20, 2016 at 1:46 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(June 20, 2016 at 1:00 am)Dust_bunny Wrote: Not that anyone really gives a shit here but if you are a humanist and psychology, hormones, neurotransmitters etc interests you, do search pmdd + controversy and you might get the whole picture. 

The last post was entertaining by the way, you should consider writing a horror film

First off, a search containing anything + controversy is going to give you biased results. The Anti-Vaxx 'movement' is a perfect example. It's the fucking internet, crazy flows through its veins.

Doing a search for PMDD in medical journals, however, gives you the actual picture.

Your haughty attitude shows your interminable arrogance. If you are an actual skeptic, you would learn how to evaluate evidence.

...because I've never read a medical journal before and wouldn't know how to do that, havn't done that already, and have no clue how to evaluate evidence. I'm not a skeptic, I'm a realist and have no interest in being a closed minded big pharma sheep. Drug companies are your gods, what they say you believe. Like medical journals dont lie and arent full of bias corruption and conflict of interest lol. Wake up. I'm not looking for the answers for pmdd, I'm well researched on all things psychology and medicine, Im just feeling you all out. Your comment is manipulative trying to insinuate that I dont understand how to do research. As if I don't know the difference between legit information and fluff. What you arent getting is that the controversy itself is the actual issue and it's a feminist issue, but whatever, narcissism seems to run high here. Go bitch slap somebody else with the I am omnipotent and always right bullshit.

I counted about logical fallacies in that statement!
Your nuttery is on par with theists.

You know about psychology? Whatever?