(June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: One subjective experience, what are we supposed to gleam from this? There are more factors involved than you just being married...

Perhaps you're attractive, well off financially, a good dad, a good provider, etc. I get what you're saying that some women like forbidden fruit but it's the exception, not the rule.

Sorry, just not true.  Before getting married I got warned by my lovely wife, my mother and married friends that this would be the case, I didn't believe it, I do now.

LOL actually it is still true, it's still your subjective experience.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Sorry, just not true.  Before getting married I got warned by my lovely wife, my mother and married friends that this would be the case, I didn't believe it, I do now.

LOL actually it is still true, it's still your subjective experience.

No, no, you believe it to be true.  

On the plus side, it gives you another reason to hate women, so not all bad.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am)bennyboy Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Just to chime in here on one point...... I got married a year ago, I can tell you, it most certainly does NOT make you less attractive to women, on the contrary.

No doubt.  Nothing validates a woman more than proving she is "sexy enough" to steal what belongs to someone else.

So from one subjective experience, we're going to concur that women just throw their pussy at you when you're off the menu? That's anecdotal, ridiculous and fallacious.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: LOL actually it is still true, it's still your subjective experience.

No, no, you believe it to be true.  

On the plus side, it gives you another reason to hate women, so not all bad.

Hate women? fucking hell...How is that not your subjective experience? I can't wait to hear this sophistry...

(June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: No, no, you believe it to be true.  

On the plus side, it gives you another reason to hate women, so not all bad.

Hate women? fucking hell...How is that not your subjective experience? I can't wait to hear this sophistry...

Flew right over your head that one, didn't it?

bless you.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: Hate women? fucking hell...How is that not your subjective experience? I can't wait to hear this sophistry...

Flew right over your head that one, didn't it?

bless you.

Which part? Your failed attempt at humor or your ad hominem?

(June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Flew right over your head that one, didn't it?

bless you.

Which part? Your failed attempt at humor or your ad hominem?

You really are a humourless fuck aren't you?

(June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: Which part? Your failed attempt at humor or your ad hominem?

You really are a humourless fuck aren't you?

Well if you're not funny to me then why would you get credit for any humor? retard. Also, humor is also SUBJECTIVE. It all comes full circle huh... mate?

I'm supposed to laugh at you saying I have another reason to hate women? fuck off with that ad hominem garbage. It's all ad hominem. Which is why you got called a retard.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am)paulpablo Wrote: You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.

I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.

You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.

You massive fat twat

1) Yes you did say it was easy if you have the internet, you said it wasn't hard to find non-monogamous people if you had that, which is beyond retarded and generalized.

2) Yes I did say non-monogamy is unattractive to most women, even not being into relationships, which is also non-monogamy, retard x2.

3) You generalized all people who couldn't find what they want as being bad at using the internet when there are more factors there, retard x3.

4) No, you don't have to be in the proximity of two vaginas to be non-monogamous, because like I said you autistic empty vessel, that you could not be into relationships which would also put you in the non-monogamy category.

Oh, if only I knew how to use the internet, I could find what I want in the middle of nowhere huh? Did you miss all of the reasons I gave? I guess so. Just an intellectually bankrupt tool.

If you have access to the Internet and live in the middle of nowhere then you can still find non monogamous women online.

If you can't have physical access to those women because you're someone who lives in the middle of nowhere with presumably little or no means of transport then that's a separate issue to finding the women.

(June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:

(June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: You really are a humourless fuck aren't you?

Well if you're not funny to me then why would you get credit for any humor? retard. Also, humor is also SUBJECTIVE. It all comes full circle huh... mate?

There's no way you're married.