Threesomes.
If I wanted to disappoint two people at once, I'd invite my parents over for dinner.
I love that joke. :-)
If I wanted to disappoint two people at once, I'd invite my parents over for dinner.
I love that joke. :-)
Poll: Monogamous or not This poll is closed. |
|||
monogamous | 30 | 76.92% | |
not monogamous | 6 | 15.38% | |
some other description | 3 | 7.69% | |
Total | 39 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Monogamous or not.
|
Threesomes.
If I wanted to disappoint two people at once, I'd invite my parents over for dinner. I love that joke. :-) (June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:(June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am)paulpablo Wrote: If you have access to the Internet and live in the middle of nowhere then you can still find non monogamous women online. Yes it is as easy as I state. Apparently I'm of the same intellectual caliber of a fire hydrant and I still find it easy. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Find two sexually polygamous people who like both you and each other sexually.'Tis the answer I presume.
ETA: That was @ Chimp3 (June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:(June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am)paulpablo Wrote: If you have access to the Internet and live in the middle of nowhere then you can still find non monogamous women online. 1) You can find non monogamous women on here, on various websites, if you can't find non monogamous women online you're bad at using the internet. I stand by that. 2) Yeh you didn't just say location, you said it depends on age, gender variables like that, but variables like that don't matter, you could be a 100 year old hermaphrodite and still be able to use the internet to find non monogamous women, they might not be attracted to you but you can still find them. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. Quote:If you're a non-monogamous guy, you're basically spraying pussy repellent on yourself, it is what it is.] This is what you said, and you accuse me of being a putting out "fucking idiotic generalizations". And you try and twist it to make it seem like I said if you're non monogamous then you're around tons of vagina as you put it. It depends on the definition of monogamy, but either way a non monogamous person is either having 1) Sex with one person and leaving themselves available to have sex with others 2) Sex with multiple people. And in either one of those scenarios they're having sex with at least as many people as a monogamous person. And I get what you mean sort of, you're saying some women are repelled by non monogamy. But you're just communicating that by making "fucking stupid generalizations" as you would say. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 12:38 pm by mlmooney89.)
I've been all over the place myself. After being abused for years sex had no place for love. I was horrible to my husband. He helped get me out of my situation at home when we were teenagers and we got married really young. I wasn't right yet in the head and I should have never married him. Sex still was just sex and I was not true to him with two guys over our 7 year relationship. I regret doing that to him more than anyone can imagine. I was a horrible person. I ended up leaving him because I knew he didn't deserve that and I realized that he had just been my shield from my attacker. I didn't know what it meant to love someone until I found my current fiancé. I don't know if it's because I'm older or if it's because I actually love this guy but the whole relationship is different. I have no desire to cheat on him. Karma got me because my ex is happy, engaged, and about to have a kid. While I am happy and engaged as well I don't think I am able to have kids physically. I don't regret leaving him or being with my fiancé I just regret hurting my ex. I think that shows that while our bodies don't want to be monogamous our emotions usually do.
“What screws us up the most in life is the picture in our head of what it's supposed to be.”
Also if your signature makes my scrolling mess up "you're tacky and I hate you." RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 12:40 pm by paulpablo.)
Quote:You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Yes but you don't understand what I mean by that. I'll give you an example of what I mean. If I go to a nightclub and I go around introducing myself as being non monogamous and talking about it constantly I imagine the majority of women will be repelled because they will wonder why I'm talking about this subject of having sex with no commitment. Because for better or for worse that isn't how sex happens. People don't go around discussing their exact likes and preferences, they tend to talk and joke then kiss then heavy petting and so on and so on. Guys don't go around saying "Hey do you like penis in your vagina?" Because even though the girl most likely does like that, the question itself will put her off the act of having a penis inside her vagina. Much in the same way going around saying "Hi I'm non monogamous and my name's Paul how are you?" Is most likely to put most women off even if they are actually non monogamous in their actions. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 3:26 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I knew a guy in the service who did exactly that, working on the law of averages, it seemed. He propositioned women openly, with no work up, and often. I'd -like- to say I was luckier with the ladies with the silver tongue approach, but I'd be a liar, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
(June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am)chimp3 Wrote:(June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: Those are both great descriptors. Why choose? So long as you avoid threesomes I think you can still claim the mono- title. Even if you were monogamous only by default I'm pretty sure you still are entitled to whatever virtue may accrue on that account. Congratulations. RE: Monogamous or not.
July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2016 at 7:15 pm by MJ the Skeptical.)
(June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am)paulpablo Wrote:(June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: 1) You can, but it is easy like you state? Fuck no, that's anecdotal shit and the fact that you can't even concede that is pathetic. Plus location wasn't the only factor I brought up, try again sweetheart. Your subjective experience or your supposition of how easy you think it is, proves it as such? No....
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|