(July 11, 2016 at 11:04 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: You gag reel.

Sorry, I doubt your cock is big enough.

(July 11, 2016 at 11:04 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: AH HA HA. If you cannot prove I am wrong

Your entire argument is a veritable wreck.

None of it makes any sense whatsoever.

You are making claims, using a language that is clearly not your first language, and that is all.

(July 11, 2016 at 11:04 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: AH HA HA. If you cannot prove I am wrong, Yet you argue I am wrong:  then YOU are incoherent = skepticism.
You gag reel.

you can't rely on my inability to defend myself ass evidence you are right. Twat.
yet here I am.

what are you. 12?

Actually, if you say some unsubstantiated bs with no evidence to back you up, then we have no reason to bother trying to prove you wrong. I operate on the assumption that everyone is wrong about everything unless they can prove otherwise.

As far as the OP....I couldn't really read the whole thing. Can you try explaining it in a more coherent way?

(July 11, 2016 at 11:35 pm)Losty Wrote: Can you try explaining it in a more coherent way?

He's coherent, we're skeptics. That is his response.

Complidudaaldo : An example of incoherent is:
using skepticism as a debate argument ~ since skepticism is neither a structural defence for one side of the argument, nor a sufficient argument towards the other. It was illogical, and redundant to present skepticism as an argument*
Presenting skepticism was in fact a demonstration of lack of coherent thought.


I am sorry Complidudaaldo but this statement is a perfect example of incoherent rambling.

I never called anyone a skeptic.

Losty:
If you cannot prove I am wrong, Yet you argue I am wrong: then YOU are incoherent

best summary, of what incoherent is.

(July 11, 2016 at 11:39 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Complidudaaldo : An example of incoherent is:
using skepticism as a debate argument ~ since skepticism is neither a structural defence for one side of the argument, nor a sufficient argument towards the other. It was illogical, and redundant to present skepticism as an argument*
Presenting skepticism was in fact a demonstration of lack of coherent thought.


I am sorry Complidudaaldo but this statement is a perfect example of incoherent rambling.

If you want to...I can show you....how to quote properly

(July 11, 2016 at 9:56 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: HONESTY = coherency.

This seems exuberantly over-optimistic.

(July 11, 2016 at 9:56 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: It does not make someone honest to state their own opinions.

Umm ..

(July 11, 2016 at 11:44 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote: I never called anyone a skeptic.

Losty:
If you cannot prove I am wrong, Yet you argue I am wrong: then YOU are incoherent

best summary, of what incoherent is.

I never argued that whatever you said here was wrong. It looked like mumbo jumbo to me. Feel free to re-write it more coherently and with supporting evidence and then I will let you know if you are right or wrong

OK, Duda. Is that double-a in your moniker separated by a glottal stop, or shall we treat it like a single-a?