(May 31, 2011 at 11:14 am)Cinjin Cain Wrote:

(May 31, 2011 at 10:32 am)Zenith Wrote:

Cinjin Cain Wrote:Peaceful co-existence of the entire world - no matter your race, your sexual orientation, your nationality or anything else -- that is the goal.

I wonder how religion fits into your anti-religion policy .
Or you would fight for the rights of Islam and Judaism and Christianity? If yes, then how would you cause a peaceful co-existence between muslims and jews?

I think you missed my point there Zenith. I would do away with all religion and thus bring the world much closer to peaceful co-existence.

You know, when you've said "no matter your race, your sexual orientation, your nationality or anything else" I was thinking about that stuff with the rights of man "no matter the sex, religion, race, etc."

Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

(May 31, 2011 at 12:03 pm)Zenith Wrote: Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

Educate the dumb shits about reality maybe. I dunno. Just a thought.

(May 31, 2011 at 12:03 pm)Zenith Wrote: Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

You can't do away with all religion. It's a pipe dream. Best we can hope for is a few thousand more years of educating the masses.

(May 30, 2011 at 7:13 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: Keep it in this thread you tool. Argue the point at hand. You made the claim in THIS thread - now back it up in THIS thread. I'm not defending every post I've ever made in every thread I've ever posted in, just because you don't have a valid point.

In case you didn't know my feelings on this...

Well that's a pretty nifty get out clause isn't it frods

That's your rational conclusion is it Nap?

(May 31, 2011 at 3:30 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: That's your rational conclusion is it Nap?

Hell yeah.

(May 28, 2011 at 7:00 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:

(May 28, 2011 at 6:53 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: @ Cinjin: Meaningless ad homs yeah - I saw those. Seems like you don't like to explain yourself much. Or justify your assertions. We must work on those guidelines for atheists methinks

No, I don't think you think at all. Like Statler, you see what you want to see. My posts stand for all to scrutinize, and I always come out justified in the end.


You on the other hand, always solidify your reputation of resident crazy person.

I am sorry but this just made me laugh, you say we see only what we want to see but then you follow it up with saying you always come out justified in the end.

Pot meet kettle, lol.

---

Somebody thinks they're psychic!!!

(June 2, 2011 at 1:12 am)Statler Waldorf Wrote:

(May 28, 2011 at 7:00 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:

(May 28, 2011 at 6:53 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: @ Cinjin: Meaningless ad homs yeah - I saw those. Seems like you don't like to explain yourself much. Or justify your assertions. We must work on those guidelines for atheists methinks

No, I don't think you think at all. Like Statler, you see what you want to see. My posts stand for all to scrutinize, and I always come out justified in the end.


You on the other hand, always solidify your reputation of resident crazy person.

I am sorry but this just made me laugh, you say we see only what we want to see but then you follow it up with saying you always come out justified in the end.

Statler! How you been man?!

I see as usual you have nothing of value to add. Good for you though for trying man!! You keep at it!

I have been quite well, thanks for asking. How about yourself?

Well value is a pretty subjective term now isn't it? I think some people find my posts valuable even if you seem to miss their point.