Progress...

[Zenith]

Peaceful co-existence of the entire world - no matter your race, your sexual orientation, your nationality or anything else -- that is the goal.

I wonder how religion fits into your anti-religion policy .
Or you would fight for the rights of Islam and Judaism and Christianity? If yes, then how would you cause a peaceful co-existence between muslims and jews?

I think you missed my point there Zenith. I would do away with all religion and thus bring the world much closer to peaceful co-existence.

You know, when you've said "no matter your race, your sexual orientation, your nationality or anything else" I was thinking about that stuff with the rights of man "no matter the sex, religion, race, etc."

Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

[Napoléon]

Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

Educate the dumb shits about reality maybe. I dunno. Just a thought.

[Cinjin]

Anyway, just curios... how would you "do away with all religion"? If you had the power/authority to do anything you wanted, what exactly would you do?

You can't do away with all religion. It's a pipe dream. Best we can hope for is a few thousand more years of educating the masses.

[fr0d0]

Keep it in this thread you tool. Argue the point at hand. You made the claim in THIS thread - now back it up in THIS thread. I'm not defending every post I've ever made in every thread I've ever posted in, just because you don't have a valid point.

In case you didn't know my feelings on this...

---

---

[Napoléon]

Well that's a pretty nifty get out clause isn't it frods

[fr0d0]

That's your rational conclusion is it Nap?

[Napoléon]

That's your rational conclusion is it Nap?

Hell yeah.

[Statler Waldorf]

@ Cinjin: Meaningless ad homs yeah - I saw those. Seems like you don't like to explain yourself much. Or justify your assertions. We must work on those guidelines for atheists methinks

No, I don't think you think at all. Like Statler, you see what you want to see. My posts stand for all to scrutinize, and I always come out justified in the end.


You on the other hand, always solidify your reputation of resident crazy person.

I am sorry but this just made me laugh, you say we see only what we want to see but then you follow it up with saying you always come out justified in the end.

Pot meet kettle, lol.

---

---

I see you're continuing in your efforts to show everyone how stupid christians are Statler. Raise your hand if you think Statler is a giant blowhard a-hole.

Why don't you come out and say what you really want to say and stop hiding behind that rhetoric about raising families, maternity leave and what not.

Tell the truth. Just say, "I'm a bigot." "I don't like homosexuals because they clearly made a choice to be attracted to the same sex and they don't deserve to enjoy life or be remotely happy." "I don't like anyone who disagrees with the holy word of god or even my particular brand of christianity. Gay people are 'icky' and they scare me." "Gay people should not have the same civil rights that I have because god loves me more and hates fags."


No ... you'll never say that will you.
But that's what you want to say. Everyone has to be just like you and the rest of the fucking sheep don't they.

You don't fool me for a second. You're just as disgusting a bigot as your brothers-in-christ who stand out in the streets with signs saying "Fags go to Hell"







You rock Pat!

Similar Thread

---

Somebody thinks they're psychic!!!

[Cinjin]

@ Cinjin: Meaningless ad homs yeah - I saw those. Seems like you don't like to explain yourself much. Or justify your assertions. We must work on those guidelines for atheists methinks

No, I don't think you think at all. Like Statler, you see what you want to see. My posts stand for all to scrutinize, and I always come out justified in the end.


You on the other hand, always solidify your reputation of resident crazy person.

I am sorry but this just made me laugh, you say we see only what we want to see but then you follow it up with saying you always come out justified in the end.

Statler! How you been man?!

I see as usual you have nothing of value to add. Good for you though for trying man!! You keep at it!

[Statler Waldorf]

---

@ Cinjin: Meaningless ad homs yeah - I saw those. Seems like you don't like to explain yourself much. Or justify your assertions. We must work on those guidelines for atheists methinks

No, I don't think you think at all. Like Statler, you see what you want to see. My posts stand for all to scrutinize, and I always come out justified in the end.


You on the other hand, always solidify your reputation of resident crazy person.

I am sorry but this just made me laugh, you say we see only what we want to see but then you follow it up with saying you always come out justified in the end.

Statler! How you been man?!

I see as usual you have nothing of value to add. Good for you though for trying man!! You keep at it!

---

I have been quite well, thanks for asking. How about yourself?

Well value is a pretty subjective term now isn't it? I think some people find my posts valuable even if you seem to miss their point.