You guys are goofy

(October 16, 2016 at 6:11 pm)Losty Wrote: You guys are goofy

It's something to do between bouts of conquering the world.

I don't think being female will make any difference. She will do whatever pleases those who got her there and have the means to keep her there. That's not us but it's also not the tumblr feminist society. I kinda hope she keeps a box of tampons in the Oval Office just for amusement though

(October 16, 2016 at 4:40 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:

(October 16, 2016 at 1:25 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: My apologies for saying you'd edited your post; I suppose I scrolled right past the post in question on my phone's small screen. I'm sorry to have laid a flase accusation in that matter.

However, you did indeed say it was in genetics:



[Emphasis added -- Thump]

Now, do you have support for that, or not?

Ah, thanks for clarifying and no worries mate
In my search for support I found stuff all over the board, but this one explained more of the nuances beside genetic predisposition. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2...APg0RZrjIU

Also found support that men have higher sex drives and cheat more than women. (currently)
http://blog.aarp.org/2015/07/01/whos-mor...-or-women/
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-men-c...men-2013-9

And back in the Victorian era, women were more likely to be "hypersexual".
http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/are-men-...ex-0704135


It's a lot more nuanced than I thought, thanks for sending me on the hunt.




http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/are-men-...ex-0704135

Well, I don't think sexual infidelity equates to corruptibility, necessarily -- not in the context we're discussing. Can you show that corruptibility -- the willingness to flout the political ethics in place in order to advance or sell one's power -- has a genetic component? And that furthermore, that hypothetical genetic component breaks down largely by gender?

Even if your premise is right, that corruptibility is gender-based (and I highly doubt that), one possible explanation sprang immediately to mind. Care to guess what it is?

Where are assassins when you need them?

Tbh I agree with Arkilogue. Women are selfish. Always seek for the man who gives them the most. For a woman a man means nothing. They only love what a man provides them. Once they find another one, they switch man like he means nothing.

Fuck women. TIME TO RISE MEN. TIME TO RISE. GET THE BITCHES BACK TO THE KITCHEN.

(October 18, 2016 at 12:42 am)Macoleco Wrote: Tbh I agree with Arkilogue. Women are selfish. Always seek for the man who gives them the most. For a woman a man means nothing. They only love what a man provides them. Once they find another one, they switch man like he means nothing.

Fuck women. TIME TO RISE MEN. TIME TO RISE. GET THE BITCHES BACK TO THE KITCHEN.

That's a woman's nature because female is the base sex of every single species. There are no all male species. There are many all female species, up to lizards as far as I know. "Males" are DNA's 2.5 billion year old "adaptation" in order to greatly increase genetic diversity.

Male is the expendable/sacrificial party designated by Nature and nature.

I gladly accept this 1 of 2 possible roles and hope to do the best I can to leave the female (humanity) better off after I'm dead, for having lived, than when I found her.

"Fuck women"??? Not in the way you're using it. You might as well cut your body in vertical half, divide your heart from your brain and separate your eye's from your finger tips.

(October 18, 2016 at 12:42 am)Macoleco Wrote: Fuck women. TIME TO RISE MEN. TIME TO RISE. GET THE BITCHES BACK TO THE KITCHEN.

As far as evolution is concerned, you are a mutant woman.