double post

Neo-Scholastic Wrote:

Mister Agenda Wrote:One would think that for it to be a complete non sequitor, the fetus would have to be outside of the woman's body....

Is or is not a fetus a body part?

Speaking of non sequiturs....

Neo-Scholastic Wrote:But none of that matters to liberals because Donald Trump said "pussy".

Don't be an idiot. It wasn't the word 'pussy' that was problematic. It was the word 'grab' in conjunction with the word 'pussy'.

Trump has similar probes ongoing. In both cases, the FBI has made no public announcements because it isn't supposed to do so near an election. The reason news hasn't reported much is because anything would just be speculation. But your accusations are also false. A simple search of "election news", pops up CNN and MSNBC (And the BBC and others as well) reporting on the topic, just reporting the facts on both sides and without much speculation. I guess that is annoying, when you desire dirt and speculation.

(November 3, 2016 at 11:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: But none of that matters to liberals because Donald Trump said "pussy".

Oh give me a fucking break, you stupid twat.  It has nothing to do with Trump using the word 'pussy'.  I know you religious types think that there's such a thing as 'bad words'.  But Jesus Fucking Christ it hasn't got a goddamn thing to do with the fucking word 'pussy'. 

Besides, it's not like that's the ONLY Trump shit-statement he's made.  He's disparaged Latinos, he's Frauded companies and students, he's outsourced to China, and he's been a general fucking piece of shit.  

But, no.  It's because he said the word pussy  Fuck, can anyone really be this dense.

(November 3, 2016 at 11:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: The thread should probably die. The news outlets on which leftists rely (i.e. the liberal MSM) are suppressing the most recent news about FBI probes of the Clinton Foundation, the emails on Weiners laptop, DOJ (Lorreta Lynch) interference with the investigation, etc. Try finding any of these recent developments on the supposedly neutral NPR...

http://www.npr.org/sections/politics/

I keep hoping that at some point the already overwhelming avalanche of new developments would compel NPR et al to give at least token coverage but instead they are giving the general public crickets. I used to think the liberal bias was largely unconscious. Now I know better. The MSM are not simply corrupt but dishonest.

NPR had steady coverage of the laptop discovery last weekend and early in the workweek.I haven't heard much about the Clinton Foundation probes, but to be fair, I haven't heard them reporting much on Trump's upcoming trials, either.

(November 3, 2016 at 11:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: As for FOX news, well, liberals don't watch because they would rather bury their heads in the sand and make excuses than admit that Hillary Clinton has more likely than not criminally undermined the instituions of our democracy by abusing public office to the detriment of national security and American interests:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2..._case.html

Well, I don't own a television at all. As for Clinton undermining democracy, no doubt she has aided its erosion, as have many of her predecessors. But that's no reason to vote for someone so obviously will to take democracy out to the back yard and put a bullet through its head.

(November 3, 2016 at 11:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: But none of that matters to liberals because Donald Trump said "pussy".

It's not because he's foul-mouthed. It's because he's a self-admitted sexual predator. I'm not sure why that doesn't seem to bother you, but hey, I guess other people have different standards than I.

Lol at people thinking anyone is upset because he said the word pussy.

It would have nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that he said that the fact that he is rich and powerful gives him the liberty to sexually assault women.

A 'business as usual' Hillary administration might be an impetus for a far worse Trump analog to drain the swamp afterwards.

I'd say the odds of that rise everyday, Trump might be a bitter pill, but in 12 years, he might be looking pretty damn good in 20/20 hindsight compared to the post-Hillary correction that even now maybe we need to start worrying about.

(November 3, 2016 at 1:12 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: A 'business as usual' Hillary administration might be an impetus for a far worse Trump analog to drain the swamp afterwards.

I'd say the odds of that rise everyday, Trump might be a bitter pill, but in 12 years, he might be looking pretty damn good in 20/20 hindsight compared to the post-Hillary correction that even now maybe we need to start worrying about.

I don't think the world would be inhabited 12 into a Trump presidency. The world is in a fragile place and the very last thing it needs is a no nothing braggart, blow hard bullying, shit as president. 

He is both laughable and scary.

The things that make Trump a viable contender now will be exacerbated by a business as usual President Hillary.

Trump could very well be the lesser of 3 evils.