Quote:but some magical figure that somehow poofed the universe into existence by some undetermined way and for some reason hates the gays.
... and shellfish
http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/
Tooth Fairy Bullshit
|
Quote:but some magical figure that somehow poofed the universe into existence by some undetermined way and for some reason hates the gays. ... and shellfish http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ RE: Tooth Fairy Bullshit
January 16, 2017 at 5:02 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2017 at 5:06 pm by ApeNotKillApe.)
(January 16, 2017 at 4:03 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 16, 2017 at 3:11 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: The difference is that saying "the universe created itself" is not what he said. His implication is that the universe started by some as yet unknown natural process whereas theists not only believe that it was not a natural process but some magical figure that somehow poofed the universe into existence by some undetermined way and for some reason hates the gays. We're agreed then that faith is frivolous and has no bearing on the truth of something.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
RE: Tooth Fairy Bullshit
January 16, 2017 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2017 at 5:25 pm by Simon Moon.)
(January 16, 2017 at 3:05 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 16, 2017 at 2:46 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Are you seriously suggesting the Universe didn't begin? Or maybe, and I'm just spitballing here, the universe always existed in another form (a singularity possibly), and all that was needed for the expansion was a phase change. So, yeah, maybe you should avoid the strawmen. (January 16, 2017 at 2:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 16, 2017 at 1:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: From a guy who literally thinks fairytale magic is real, I'm flattered. Please just stop with the strawman arguments already! While there are some physicists that say the universe came from nothing, they do not mean 'nothing' as in complete nonexistence. The definition that most physicists use for nothing is "no space at all, and no time, no particles, no fields, no laws of nature". You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. (January 15, 2017 at 7:14 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(January 15, 2017 at 5:05 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Uh, no, they don't. That's partly what we're trying to explain to you here with this whole tooth fairy thing. The questions you pose are bad questions to begin with. They imply purpose. There is no purpose to there being something rather than nothing. There is no reason why one alternative is better or more meaningful than the other. One just happens to be true and there is no purpose to that being the case. There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide mankind that cannot be achieved as well or better through secular means.
Bitch at my blog! Follow me on Twitter! Subscribe to my YouTube channel! (January 16, 2017 at 5:10 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: lol, fish got hooked on his own bait. You know what they say about fish with big mouths...
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Yes. Precisely what I was driving at.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
(January 16, 2017 at 5:02 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:No one said it did..(January 16, 2017 at 4:03 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You can't refer to it as a 'natural' process if the process is unknown, you assume the process to be natural, yet there are absolutely no examples of nature producing anything from nothing. Think about how many different "faiths" that exists they can't all be true now can they? (January 16, 2017 at 6:15 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 16, 2017 at 5:02 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: We're agreed then that faith is frivolous and has no bearing on the truth of something.No one said it did.. No, they can't.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|