(February 18, 2017 at 11:53 pm)scoobysnack Wrote:

(February 18, 2017 at 11:13 pm)Aroura Wrote: So Scooby....what happened last night in Sweden?
Give us your interpretation of what he meant.

Hillary Clinton has the answer. 









But to be honest, Trump clarified his comment after being questioned by CNN about Sweden.

Just like I said to Theist. Whenever you can't excuse whatever stupid shit Trump said you bring it back to Hillary. Ancient history, bud. Nobody cares.

Didn't answer my question. Care to link a video or text of the later question and clarification? Pretty please.
(also, since CNN had to ask him, and we all know now that CNN is fake news, does that mean the answer they tell us is also fake?)

What does Trump mean when he says words? Because apparently, unlike past presidents, he needs an interpreter even when he's speaking "English".

(February 19, 2017 at 1:15 am)Aegon Wrote:

(February 18, 2017 at 11:53 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: ....

Just like I said to Theist.  Whenever you can't excuse whatever stupid shit Trump said you bring it back to Hillary. Ancient history, bud. Nobody cares.

Neither do I. He didn't say the words terrorist attack, but the press has now made a story by interpreting what he implied. To me the funny thing is people are getting flustered over nothing really. Watch, this will turn into the biggest story about the entire speech. How would I know what he meant. Perhaps he was thinking of something else and misspoke. That's why I posted the videos I did.

(February 19, 2017 at 1:22 am)scoobysnack Wrote:

(February 19, 2017 at 1:15 am)Aegon Wrote: Just like I said to Theist.  Whenever you can't excuse whatever stupid shit Trump said you bring it back to Hillary. Ancient history, bud. Nobody cares.

Neither do I. He didn't say the words terrorist attack, but the press has now made a story by interpreting what he implied. To me the funny thing is people are getting flustered over nothing really. Watch, this will turn into the biggest story about the entire speech. How would I know what he meant. Perhaps he was thinking of something else and misspoke. That's why I posted the videos I did.

So, should we all just ignore him, then?  I mean, this happens pretty much every time he speaks.  He is the president, his words carry more weight than you or I.  A misstep here and there is expected, we are all human.  But if we can never be sure what he means, what is the point of having him as president? He's just a rambling lunatic if no one can "interpret" what he means.  If even when asked, his answers are unclear.

At any rate, it appears he's gotten this bit from Fox News, but they didn't report a terrorist attack, just crime rates.  Still, it's what he watches, and he pretty much gets all his info from cable news....you know, the ones he calls fake. Isn't THAT the biggest irony ever?  lol

Quote:However, Fox News host Tucker Carlson ran an interview on Friday night's broadcast of "Tucker Carlson Tonight" with documentarian and media personality Ami Horowitz, who presented a clip from a new film documenting alleged violence committed by refugees in Sweden. The segment went on extensively about a supposed crime surge in Sweden and its links to immigrant populations. 
Crime rates in Sweden have stayed relatively stable, with some fluctuations, over the last decade, according to the 2016 Swedish Crime Survey.
This isn't the first time that there has been a correlation between Trump's statements and programming on cable news, of which he is a noted fan.
In late January, Trump tweeted about gun violence in Chicago shortly after after an "O'Reilly Factor" segment on the same topic, which cited the same statistics and even used the word "carnage," a recent favorite noun of Trump's.

Fox and worse right wing sites give Trump his news.  Then Trump misinterprets what he hears, or misremembers, or twists it to his own agenda, and broadcasts it to his fans on twitter and so forth, and you all think he's brilliant for repeating what he heard from Bill O'Reilly. It really is just a giant circle jerk with the president not even leading it, but following whatever news catches his interest.  This isn't from the CIA, FI, or the head a head of some other country.  He's just like an old, Drunk Uncle, listening to crazy conspiracy theories and repeating half garbled versions of them to his bar buddies.

Quote:<the words of an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing>

Wow your just making my points for me it's just fair really. As this sums every comment you have every made of this site loud and pointless.

(February 19, 2017 at 3:30 am)Orochi Wrote:

Quote:<the words of an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing>

Wow your just making my points for me it's just fair really. As this sums every comment you have every made of this site loud and pointless.

You talking to me or a theist?

(February 19, 2017 at 6:35 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(February 19, 2017 at 3:30 am)Orochi Wrote: Wow your just making my points for me it's just fair really. As this sums every comment you have every made of this site loud and pointless.

You talking to me or a theist?

A theist

(February 18, 2017 at 10:19 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Sure, Europe is becoming a shit show.

I live in Europe and its an darn sight better than the US. 

Quote:Look at France riots. Why do you think Le Penn is pulling way ahead.

Because there are a lot of arseholes around and the French are not immune to that.
What is happenng now is that the world is starting to look a l;ot like it does just before world wars start with right wing demagogues being voted in by idiots.

Quote:Besides it's more of temporary halt to strengthen the vetting process from certain nations of concern where Isis fighters and extremists are. It's not just terrorist attacks, but also all the other problems and crimes that's happening. Sweden is hiding how bad it is just to be PC, punishing cops who speak the truth about it.

So you don't believe whats said unless it supports your thoughts.

Quote:Besides if you actually listened to the speech, instead of getting your rawstory cherry picked stories, you would know he talked about creating safe zones in those countries and getting the gulf states to pay for the creation and take the migrants.

You mean that thing they tried before which led to widespread disease and exploitation, those camps? 

http://harvardpolitics.com/covers/horror-camps/

Quote:The civil war in Syria has passed its third anniversary, yet the situation in and around the nation remains dire. War persists, and the crisis endures, affecting approximately 2.5 million Syrian nationals who have been displaced from their homes into neighboring countries. These innocent civilians—75 percent of whom are women and children and 1.5 million of whom are under the age of 18— arrive at refugee camps seeking shelter from the terrors they have escaped. Yet these oases of hope have become breeding grounds for dangerous and thoroughly underreported events that threaten the bodily sanctity of the refugees within them. Among the greatest threats to refugees are the systematic rape and sexual harassment of girls and women and a quickly growing organ trafficking market. Without widespread awareness of these issues, steps cannot be taken to reverse them.

[/quote]

---

(February 19, 2017 at 1:54 am)Aroura Wrote:

(February 19, 2017 at 1:22 am)scoobysnack Wrote: Neither do I. He didn't say the words terrorist attack, but the press has now made a story by interpreting what he implied. To me the funny thing is people are getting flustered over nothing really. Watch, this will turn into the biggest story about the entire speech. How would I know what he meant. Perhaps he was thinking of something else and misspoke. That's why I posted the videos I did.

So, should we all just ignore him, then?  I mean, this happens pretty much every time he speaks.  He is the president, his words carry more weight than you or I.  A misstep here and there is expected, we are all human.  But if we can never be sure what he means, what is the point of having him as president? He's just a rambling lunatic if no one can "interpret" what he means.  If even when asked, his answers are unclear.

At any rate, it appears he's gotten this bit from Fox News, but they didn't report a terrorist attack, just crime rates.  Still, it's what he watches, and he pretty much gets all his info from cable news....you know, the ones he calls fake. Isn't THAT the biggest irony ever?  lol

Quote:However, Fox News host Tucker Carlson ran an interview on Friday night's broadcast of "Tucker Carlson Tonight" with documentarian and media personality Ami Horowitz, who presented a clip from a new film documenting alleged violence committed by refugees in Sweden. The segment went on extensively about a supposed crime surge in Sweden and its links to immigrant populations. 
Crime rates in Sweden have stayed relatively stable, with some fluctuations, over the last decade, according to the 2016 Swedish Crime Survey.
This isn't the first time that there has been a correlation between Trump's statements and programming on cable news, of which he is a noted fan.
In late January, Trump tweeted about gun violence in Chicago shortly after after an "O'Reilly Factor" segment on the same topic, which cited the same statistics and even used the word "carnage," a recent favorite noun of Trump's.

Fox and worse right wing sites give Trump his news.  Then Trump misinterprets what he hears, or misremembers, or twists it to his own agenda, and broadcasts it to his fans on twitter and so forth, and you all think he's brilliant for repeating what he heard from Bill O'Reilly. It really is just a giant circle jerk with the president not even leading it, but following whatever news catches his interest.  This isn't from the CIA, FI, or the head a head of some other country.  He's just like an old, Drunk Uncle, listening to crazy conspiracy theories and repeating half garbled versions of them to his bar buddies.

---

(February 19, 2017 at 1:54 am)Aroura Wrote:

(February 19, 2017 at 1:22 am)scoobysnack Wrote: Neither do I. He didn't say the words terrorist attack, but the press has now made a story by interpreting what he implied. To me the funny thing is people are getting flustered over nothing really. Watch, this will turn into the biggest story about the entire speech. How would I know what he meant. Perhaps he was thinking of something else and misspoke. That's why I posted the videos I did.

So, should we all just ignore him, then?  I mean, this happens pretty much every time he speaks.  He is the president, his words carry more weight than you or I.  A misstep here and there is expected, we are all human.  But if we can never be sure what he means, what is the point of having him as president? He's just a rambling lunatic if no one can "interpret" what he means.  If even when asked, his answers are unclear.

At any rate, it appears he's gotten this bit from Fox News, but they didn't report a terrorist attack, just crime rates.  Still, it's what he watches, and he pretty much gets all his info from cable news....you know, the ones he calls fake. Isn't THAT the biggest irony ever?  lol

Quote:However, Fox News host Tucker Carlson ran an interview on Friday night's broadcast of "Tucker Carlson Tonight" with documentarian and media personality Ami Horowitz, who presented a clip from a new film documenting alleged violence committed by refugees in Sweden. The segment went on extensively about a supposed crime surge in Sweden and its links to immigrant populations. 
Crime rates in Sweden have stayed relatively stable, with some fluctuations, over the last decade, according to the 2016 Swedish Crime Survey.
This isn't the first time that there has been a correlation between Trump's statements and programming on cable news, of which he is a noted fan.
In late January, Trump tweeted about gun violence in Chicago shortly after after an "O'Reilly Factor" segment on the same topic, which cited the same statistics and even used the word "carnage," a recent favorite noun of Trump's.

Fox and worse right wing sites give Trump his news.  Then Trump misinterprets what he hears, or misremembers, or twists it to his own agenda, and broadcasts it to his fans on twitter and so forth, and you all think he's brilliant for repeating what he heard from Bill O'Reilly. It really is just a giant circle jerk with the president not even leading it, but following whatever news catches his interest.  This isn't from the CIA, FI, or the head a head of some other country.  He's just like an old, Drunk Uncle, listening to crazy conspiracy theories and repeating half garbled versions of them to his bar buddies.

Swedens official twitter account felt the need to respond perplexedly with  "Nothing has happened here in Sweden. There has not [been] any terrorist attacks here. At all."

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/dona...spartanntp

he is insane.

(February 19, 2017 at 9:24 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(February 18, 2017 at 10:19 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Sure, Europe is becoming a shit show.

I live in Europe and its an darn sight better than the US. 

It's hilarious watching right wing Americans talk authoritatively about countries that they know nothing about and have never visited without considering the fact that the people they are talking to might not actually be American and might even live there.

It shows that they are just parroting what they are being told without any critical thought.

It's no less hilarious watching them talk about murica if you're an american.  They've completely checked out of reality, lol.  Massacres that never happened, murders that don't occur, invading hordes made of mist, the systematic oppression of the white christian male...........