(February 20, 2017 at 4:03 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote:

(February 20, 2017 at 1:53 pm)Aegon Wrote: Look, there's a difference between a biased news source and a legitimate news source. Whether you like it or not, CNN and MSNBC are legitimate. The easiest way to figure it out is to look into their sources, or, do additional research about the subject to find the facts they're working with. You'll find that both CNN and MSNBC will generally pass that test.

The President himself however? Fails that test the majority of the time. And when the media calls him.out on his bullshit (as they should) he acts like they fabricated it all. And people actually believe him. It's sad...

But in most cases it is the reverse. They fabricate stories and Trump calls them out on their bs. I do not understand how you are getting the opposite opinion. 

For example, they use an earlier shot during his inauguration from PBS to say that not many people were present instead of showing the later shot that demonstrated otherwise. A complete and total lie considering they never brought up the timescale. 

They did the same with pussy-gate and every other story while ignoring Hillarys KKK affiliation. 

How on earth do you expect me to take credit in your ability to tell fake news from real news? Ignoring something does not making it fake nor does lying turn to truth. At this point you might as well be a Christian.

---

(February 20, 2017 at 1:56 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: What sources do you consider legitimate?

Research and a bit of article digging. Breitbart does a pretty good job when they aren't being asinine for shits and giggles.

No, Brietbart is pure winger tabloid bullshit that isn't just biased, but is willing to print the most baseless of lies to bring their political adversaries down. Not only that, they promote absurd conspiracy theories about transgendered people, Mexican Americans, climate change research, one world government paranoia, and other absurd garbage that would be comedic if so many people didn't believe it.

The irony here is, you might just be the only person here reading fake news.

(February 20, 2017 at 8:16 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote:

(February 20, 2017 at 4:32 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Compared to what?  Fox "News"?

Wait.  Breitbart?

Seriously?

The Onion is more of a legit news site than either of the two I've mentioned.

I am going to pretend that you are a young child with great ignorance but still capable of reasoning. One day, in the distant future

Considering three lies you have repeated have been exposed you have no right to say this line. Fool

(February 20, 2017 at 8:16 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote:

(February 20, 2017 at 4:32 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Compared to what?  Fox "News"?

Wait.  Breitbart?

Seriously?

The Onion is more of a legit news site than either of the two I've mentioned.

I am going to pretend that you are a young child with great ignorance but still capable of reasoning. One day, in the distant future

Beccs happens to be a surgeon. I'm willing to bet that she has more intelligence in her pinky finger than you do in your entire body.

Also..she's the crazy lady with a scalpel.

She won't need a scalpel.  She'll put on sandals and kick this lightweight's ass.

Meanwhile, down here on planet Earth.....

Well, comrade meow.

I'll pretend you're not a pedantic little fuckstain stuck to the underpants of humanity who has a hope of getting an education one day.

I doubt it's possible since those sucked into believing Breitbart and Faux Noise tend to be the most fanatical and under educated sheep in the world.

(February 20, 2017 at 11:58 pm)Orochi Wrote:

(February 20, 2017 at 8:16 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: I am going to pretend that you are a young child with great ignorance but still capable of reasoning. One day, in the distant future

Considering three lies you have repeated have been exposed you have no right to say this line. Fool

I pity the foo' who thinks Valk can't track him down and do unspeakable things to him!

(February 20, 2017 at 8:16 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote:

(February 20, 2017 at 4:32 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Compared to what?  Fox "News"?

Wait.  Breitbart?

Seriously?

The Onion is more of a legit news site than either of the two I've mentioned.

I am going to pretend that you are a young child with great ignorance but still capable of reasoning. One day, in the distant future

That's right keep pretending. It's the only thing you're good at Mr. Creationist.

(February 20, 2017 at 4:03 pm)Mathilda Wrote: I am sure that the Trumpists (Trumpkins?) would be delighted to know that the rest of the world is looking on in horror at Trump and what is happening in America. They'd probably put it down to Trump making America great again. I don't think they have the slightest clue though that the rest of the world also considers Trump to be a complete laughing stock.

The frightening thing is that they do know it and they love it. The thinking goes that if the world hates what Trump is doing, then Trump is doing "it" right--whatever that "it" may be. It's the result of ignorant, insulated thinking; they really don't have much of a concept that a world exists outside of the U.S., Canada, and northernmost Mexico. Therefore, they see the fantastical "libtard" as being anyone who isn't on their side.

(February 20, 2017 at 4:03 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Research and a bit of article digging. Breitbart does a pretty good job when they aren't being asinine for shits and giggles.

Have you ever bothered to check one of their articles against reality? You can't have, otherwise your definition of reality must be very different than mine. They either invent stuff or twist it to fit their agenda. Glaringly obvious when they're "reporting" on Europe. I once stumbled over a report on an event that was several years old, yet they reported it as breaking news. Not only that, they distorted the actual event into something completely new.