YOu know what I'd love to see?  A Democrat introduce a Balanced Budget Amendment.  The Republicunts would sprain their balls running away from it!

(August 25, 2017 at 2:45 pm)Minimalist Wrote: YOu know what I'd love to see?  A Democrat introduce a Balanced Budget Amendment.  The Republicunts would sprain their balls running away from it!

Now I really hate you Minn. You are a heartless bastard. How dare you deny the GOP a bloated military complex, it is like you like Ike? And how the fuck are CEO billionaires going to eat if we don't give them tax breaks? The Walmart Family and Exxon CEOs will be destitute!

Katrina "STOP SPENDING MONEY!"

Harvey, "Nu uh, it's not the same."

Why wont you let the poor persecuted billionaires have their toys and wars? FUCK URBAN SUBURBAN AND RURAL WORKERS!

Just a prick, I guess.

(August 25, 2017 at 2:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Just a prick, I guess.

Yes, why yes you are, but for the right reasons.

Don't forget they need that borrowed money for corporate welfare checks for Nike and Boeing and god knows (well he doesn't because he doesn't exist) who else.

Commentator on POTUS the other day noted there should be (in his opinion) a delineation in the US guvmint budget process between infrastructure spending (bridges, buildings, public housing, schools, roads etc.) and everything else (most military, administration, social, benefits, etc.). And the idea being borrowing money to pay for the former is 'ok' and borrowing money for the latter isn't.

Not mentioned on the program was many (most?) state budgets are required to be balanced (for income and outlays) and this idea might find utility in reigning in federal deficits, but then going to the next level: the state level, fostering a liberalization regarding infrastructure spending.

Republicunts no longer care about deficits.  That's only when democrats are in charge.