Quote:I've read it...

I seriously doubt you have the intellect or the attention span to absorb it. If you've read anything with a 'Talkorigins' tag it's likely a bastardised version from answers in genesis.

(September 26, 2017 at 6:18 pm)JackRussell Wrote:

(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote: None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

I think I must be psychic, I am sure I said elsewhere that creationists always deny this without clearly ever having read it.

If you don't think I understand the science, please show me the flaws in the article so we can discuss them. And I can assure you I have read a lot more than read just Theobald. Might even invite my sister here, with her PhD in Genetics. But then, she's a woman, what the fuck would she know about science.

You haven't studied shit, just swallowed it.

 She can't defend against what is known, understand this DNA can't have new information add to it and thus eliminates the possibility for on kind to become another, period. This is something you can not get around.

GC

---

(September 26, 2017 at 8:01 pm)Jehanne Wrote:

(September 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm)Godscreated Wrote: None of that is proof of evolution, you do not even understand the science you think is real.

Evolution = Descent with Modification.  What is there to understand that does not involve the many complexities and nuances of Science?  The concept of evolution is straightforward.

 Being straight forward as you say doesn't mean it's true, just your stated opinion that doesn't hold water against the facts.

GC

---

(September 26, 2017 at 8:27 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:

(September 26, 2017 at 3:44 pm)Godscreated Wrote: It's bunk it refutes itself if one uses critical thinking.

How the fuck would you know anything about critical thinking?

 I just might understand things of many kinds you wouldn't believe, but then I do not care what you believe about me. God knows and in the end that's all that counts.

GC

(September 28, 2017 at 3:54 pm)Godscreated Wrote:

(September 26, 2017 at 8:01 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Evolution = Descent with Modification.  What is there to understand that does not involve the many complexities and nuances of Science?  The concept of evolution is straightforward.

Being straight forward as you say doesn't mean it's true, just your stated opinion that doesn't hold water against the facts.

GC

Name one fact that does not support Darwinian evolution.

Incredulity is all we get from GC, he has clearly NEVER read the actual evidence and has no real understanding of what evolution is.

It's all crocoducks to him.

Sad really, when it is so amazing.

(September 28, 2017 at 3:54 pm)Godscreated Wrote:

(September 26, 2017 at 6:18 pm)JackRussell Wrote: I think I must be psychic, I am sure I said elsewhere that creationists always deny this without clearly ever having read it.

If you don't think I understand the science, please show me the flaws in the article so we can discuss them. And I can assure you I have read a lot more than read just Theobald. Might even invite my sister here, with her PhD in Genetics. But then, she's a woman, what the fuck would she know about science.

You haven't studied shit, just swallowed it.

 She can't defend against what is known, understand this DNA can't have new information add to it and thus eliminates the possibility for on kind to become another, period. This is something you can not get around.

GC

---

(September 26, 2017 at 8:01 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Evolution = Descent with Modification.  What is there to understand that does not involve the many complexities and nuances of Science?  The concept of evolution is straightforward.

 Being straight forward as you say doesn't mean it's true, just your stated opinion that doesn't hold water against the facts.

GC

---

(September 26, 2017 at 8:27 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: How the fuck would you know anything about critical thinking?

 I just might understand things of many kinds you wouldn't believe, but then I do not care what you believe about me. God knows and in the end that's all that counts.

GC

Ooohhh....you "just might" understand things.  You sure haven't demonstrated it here.

Angels push planets in their orbits, stars, too!  Why?  Because my religion says that they do, but they do it in such a way that their motions can be modeled by mindless forces.

Proof that you can add information to DNA:

Take an organism, say we call it A. Suppose that its offspring suffers a mutation in its genome. According to creationist dogma, this must either result in no change in the amount of information, or a loss of information. Let's assume for the sake of argument that it results in a loss of information. By definition, this new organism, B, has less information than A. Now suppose that B's offspring suffers a mutation which changes its DNA back to that which it was in A. Call this organism C. Because A has more information than B, and A and C have the same information, organism C's DNA has more information than B's DNA (by transitivity). Thus, by mutation, an increase in information was observed.

QED.