Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 4, 2024, 7:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 1:46 pm)Hammy Wrote: This guy is a quack.

Ya'll mite need to pay more attention to This thread.

The one he linked to Here.

Dude's got history. He will give you the run around, for ever!
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: Have you ever heard the saying that there is no good without god?  In that same sense, there is no good without positive emotions.  When a person without god in his life still makes a decision to save his own life or the life of someone else, then how does the religious doctrine address this?  I'm quite sure it would be the same answer here as well when it comes to positive emotions being the god in our lives.

Fair enough you can say that there is no good without positive emotions, which are intrinsically good.

But then you can't argue that intense ecstasy of an extreme single positive emotion for a few moments isn't better than the 'wisdom' of choosing a variety of positive emotions over a shorter period of time... without borrowing from values other than intrinsically good positive emotions. Wisdom, moderation and variety doesn't matter if all that matters is positive emotions.

So for you to argue that a variety of positive emotions that are non-extreme is necessary... then you'd have to argue that there are other values like moderation that are important too... and not just positive emotions.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:21 pm)Hammy Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: Have you ever heard the saying that there is no good without god?  In that same sense, there is no good without positive emotions.  When a person without god in his life still makes a decision to save his own life or the life of someone else, then how does the religious doctrine address this?  I'm quite sure it would be the same answer here as well when it comes to positive emotions being the god in our lives.

Fair enough you can say that there is no good without positive emotions, which are intrinsically good.

But then you can't argue that intense ecstasy of an extreme single positive emotion for a few moments isn't better than the 'wisdom' of choosing a variety of positive emotions over a shorter period of time... without borrowing from values other than intrinsically good positive emotions. Wisdom, moderation and variety doesn't matter if all that matters is positive emotions.

So for you to argue that a variety of positive emotions that are non-extreme is necessary... then you'd have to argue that there are other values like moderation that are important too... and not just positive emotions.

But the thing is, if I was in the most miserable state of my life and I have made a decision such as getting myself all better so that I can have all the positive emotions I want in my life, then I would still be able to tell that such a decision during that miserable moment was still just a thought.  It was no real good value being perceived in my life at all.  My life was still empty.  It was like I was missing a higher component (the inner light) to truly make my life and atmosphere beautiful and good.  So, how would we accommodate this? I have, in fact, had such miserable moments happen to me. Many of them, as a matter of fact. I have thought that making decisions was something good and beautiful, but my life was still completely empty. It was still the worst life.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:29 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:21 pm)Hammy Wrote: Fair enough you can say that there is no good without positive emotions, which are intrinsically good.

But then you can't argue that intense ecstasy of an extreme single positive emotion for a few moments isn't better than the 'wisdom' of choosing a variety of positive emotions over a shorter period of time... without borrowing from values other than intrinsically good positive emotions. Wisdom, moderation and variety doesn't matter if all that matters is positive emotions.

So for you to argue that a variety of positive emotions that are non-extreme is necessary... then you'd have to argue that there are other values like moderation that are important too... and not just positive emotions.

But the thing is, if I was in the most miserable state of my life and I have made a decision such as getting myself all better so that I can have all the positive emotions I want in my life, then I would still be able to tell that such a decision during that miserable moment was still just a thought.  It was no real good value being perceived in my life at all.  My life was still empty.  It was like I was missing a higher component (the inner light) to truly make my life and atmosphere beautiful and good.  So, how would we accommodate this?  I have, in fact, had such miserable moments happen to me.  Many of them, as a matter of fact.  I have thought that making decisions was something good and beautiful, but my life was still completely empty.  It was still the worst life.

What you have said is correct but not relevant.

My point is that if positive emotions are intrinsically good then when you are at your most miserable times in your life your aim is to get maximum positive emotion. And it need not be many positive emotions. And not even for a long time. Because you have no criterion to decide if multiple moderate positive emotions over a long time is better than just one extremely positive emotion for a few moments.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:38 pm)Hammy Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:29 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: But the thing is, if I was in the most miserable state of my life and I have made a decision such as getting myself all better so that I can have all the positive emotions I want in my life, then I would still be able to tell that such a decision during that miserable moment was still just a thought.  It was no real good value being perceived in my life at all.  My life was still empty.  It was like I was missing a higher component (the inner light) to truly make my life and atmosphere beautiful and good.  So, how would we accommodate this?  I have, in fact, had such miserable moments happen to me.  Many of them, as a matter of fact.  I have thought that making decisions was something good and beautiful, but my life was still completely empty.  It was still the worst life.

What you have said is correct but not relevant.

My point is that if positive emotions are intrinsically good then when you are at your most miserable times in your life your aim is to get maximum positive emotion. And it need not be many positive emotions. And not even for a long time. Because you have no criterion to decide if multiple moderate positive emotions over a long time is better than just one extremely positive emotion for a few moments.

But, by this, you are saying that my life was still good and beautiful since I have made a decision where I have decided that it was better for me to get the help I needed rather than to just give up on life entirely.  This wouldn't be any real good and beauty in my life.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:43 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:38 pm)Hammy Wrote: What you have said is correct but not relevant.

My point is that if positive emotions are intrinsically good then when you are at your most miserable times in your life your aim is to get maximum positive emotion. And it need not be many positive emotions. And not even for a long time. Because you have no criterion to decide if multiple moderate positive emotions over a long time is better than just one extremely positive emotion for a few moments.

But, by this, you are saying that my life was still good and beautiful since I have made a decision where I have decided that it was better for me to get the help I needed rather than to just give up on life entirely.  This wouldn't be any real good and beauty in my life.

No I'm not saying that. I'm saying that your life is miserable so the correct thing to do is to stop feeling miserable and start feeling positive emotion by any which way you can. And the greater the intensity of the positive emotion the better. But also the longer you experience the positive emotions for the better. But you have no criterion to decide which is better. You also have no way to decide that two positive emotions are better than one if one of them is more intense than both of them together. So you have no way to decide whether 10 positive emotions experienced mildly for the rest of your life is better than intense ecstasy for 10 minutes. Do you understand?
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:54 pm)Hammy Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:43 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: But, by this, you are saying that my life was still good and beautiful since I have made a decision where I have decided that it was better for me to get the help I needed rather than to just give up on life entirely.  This wouldn't be any real good and beauty in my life.

No I'm not saying that. I'm saying that your life is miserable so the correct thing to do is to stop feeling miserable and start feeling positive emotion by any which way you can. And the greater the intensity of the positive emotion the better. But also the longer you experience the positive emotions for the better. But you have no criterion to decide which is better. You also have no way to decide that two positive emotions are better than one if one of them is more intense than both of them together. So you have no way to decide whether 10 positive emotions experienced mildly for the rest of your life is better than intense ecstasy for 10 minutes. Do you understand?

Yes, I understand.  Alright, so this means that if positive emotions were intrinsically good, we would not be able to decide other things and situations as being good or wise.  From here, my worldview/idea would say that the good value and beauty that comes about in our lives through having no positive emotions would be a no quality standard of good value and beauty.  It would still be good value and beauty, but it would be devoid of the light (positive emotions).   It would be like the words good value and beauty being lit up at the entrance to a dance club as opposed to those words being shut down (i.e. "dead"). Those words are still there, but they are "dead."
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: Have you ever heard the saying that there is no good without god?  In that same sense, there is no good without positive emotions. 
This statement is inconsistent with your previous contention that there could be emotional good, and good of thought.  If they are separate things, and can exist independent and even in contradiction with each other....then good without positive emotion is not only a possibility, but a an inevitability.

Amusingly, examples are easy to find.  I know it's good to flush the toilet, but doing it doesn't make me euphoric. You manage to contradict yourself and reality in a single breath. Bravo.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 7:04 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: Have you ever heard the saying that there is no good without god?  In that same sense, there is no good without positive emotions. 
This statement is inconsistent with your previous contention that there could be emotional good, and good of thought.  If they are separate things, and can exist independent and even in contradiction with each other....then good without positive emotion is not only a possibility, but a an inevitability.

Amusingly, examples are easy to find.  I know it's good to flush the toilet, but doing it doesn't make me euphoric.  You manage to contradict yourself and reality in a single breath.  Bravo.

Then read my recent posts to know what I mean here.  I first had a conversation where I said that positive emotions really are the only good and that we can't have good thoughts and that situations can't be good.  I then later said that there is good without positive emotions, but that it would be like the words at the entrance to a club being shut down (i.e. "dead"). It would be a no quality standard of goodness in your life. I am still in the process of trying to work out this whole worldview so that it is clear to others. So, don't just jump to the conclusion that I am speaking nonsense, making contradictions, and then end your discussion with me.
Reply
RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
(September 29, 2017 at 7:01 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote:
(September 29, 2017 at 6:54 pm)Hammy Wrote: No I'm not saying that. I'm saying that your life is miserable so the correct thing to do is to stop feeling miserable and start feeling positive emotion by any which way you can. And the greater the intensity of the positive emotion the better. But also the longer you experience the positive emotions for the better. But you have no criterion to decide which is better. You also have no way to decide that two positive emotions are better than one if one of them is more intense than both of them together. So you have no way to decide whether 10 positive emotions experienced mildly for the rest of your life is better than intense ecstasy for 10 minutes. Do you understand?

Yes, I understand.  Alright, so this means that if positive emotions were intrinsically good, we would not be able to decide other things and situations as being good or wise.  From here, my worldview/idea would say that the good value and beauty that comes about in our lives through having no positive emotions would be a no quality standard of good value and beauty.  It would still be good value and beauty, but it would be devoid of the light (positive emotions).   It would be like the words good value and beauty being lit up at the entrance to a dance club as opposed to those words being shut down (i.e. "dead").  Those words are still there, but they are "dead."

Okay fair enough. But it sounds to me that you are saying positive emotions are a necessary but not sufficient condition for a good life. Because positive emotions aren't enough without moderation and wisdom.

But you are also saying that the other values are useless without positive emotions.

Positive emotions can't be intrinsically good if they're not good enough in and of themselves though, TD. Because that's what intrinsically good means.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can too much respect be bad? Fake Messiah 48 5128 January 14, 2020 at 11:28 am
Last Post: roofinggiant
  Technology, Good or Bad Overall? ColdComfort 41 6245 July 7, 2019 at 1:02 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  There are no higher emotions/values Transcended Dimensions 58 12334 April 30, 2018 at 4:19 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
Wink Emoticons are Intrinsically Good and Evil Fireball 4 1142 October 21, 2017 at 12:11 am
Last Post: Succubus
  Name one objectively bad person ErGingerbreadMandude 57 15219 October 16, 2017 at 3:47 am
Last Post: Ignorant
  Is there a logical, rational reason why hate is bad? WisdomOfTheTrees 27 3841 February 4, 2017 at 10:43 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Is developing a strong habit of philosophizing bad for your social skills? Edwardo Piet 31 4367 May 25, 2016 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Gemini
Smile a bad person Sappho 30 5369 December 8, 2015 at 7:59 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  The bad guy Marsellus Wallace 18 5479 July 28, 2015 at 8:15 am
Last Post: Marsellus Wallace
Bug Do Fruit Flies Have Emotions? Hatshepsut 28 3452 May 16, 2015 at 7:56 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)