Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 2:04 pm
Thread Rating:
Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
|
Not just full of shit but also straw... it was cringeworthy to watch that video. I've had that book sitting (borrowed) on my shelf for ages, meaning to read it, but watching that video, has put me right off. His chapter 7 for instance, paints the picture that science sees the brain like a traditional computer, and is failing to find memory trace/'stores' from that perspective, which is just flat out wrong... it's not looking for that at all... total straw man that's making my blood boil.
He's wrong on Dogma 3, as physicists do not claim that the laws thereof are the same now as in the beginning (big bang). As far as whether or not we are truly conscious (Dogma 2), I'll leave that to the people who specialize in that sort of research. As for Dogma 1, I see nothing wrong with a mechanistic universe, and have yet to see any way it is non-mechanistic. Dogpile 3 is as far as I watched; that was enough for me to give this talk the FoS stamp.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
May 19, 2018 at 4:38 pm
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2018 at 4:41 pm by Pat Mustard.)
(May 19, 2018 at 12:44 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Is contemporary science based on 10 dogmas, or is Sheldrake full of shit? Sheldrake is full of shit. I don't even have to watch the video to know that. I've read enough of his execrable effluence to know what he's like. (May 19, 2018 at 1:25 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(May 19, 2018 at 1:06 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Estimating the quality of a product from the manufacturer’s track record is not. When the sum total of a man's claim to be right is the Galileo fallacy, then you can dismiss his ideas. Sheldrake is a copious user of the Galileo fallacy.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
I see a lot of people claiming this guy doesn't know what he is talking about, but I don't see why he doesn't know what he is talking about.
But your individuality and your present need will be swept away by change,
and what you now ardently desire will one day become the object of abhorrence.
~ Schiller - 'Psychological Types'
RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
May 19, 2018 at 6:11 pm
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2018 at 7:29 pm by vulcanlogician.)
Yeah, as others have said, he staw mans quite a bit. I would like to hear the opinion of Polymath or Anom about his claims concerning the fluctuations of constants. That was really the only thing that piqued my interest. If the gravitational constant fluctuated, wouldn't that create observable anomalies in planetary motions? IDK.
Science is far from perfect. Errors do occur. Publication bias is a thing. False theories (such as ether) are sometimes generated because of scientist's assumptions. But science eventually corrects its errors. Science is all about proof. If this guy thinks that rodents can commune psychically from different continents, he should prove it. If he can't prove it, then he should admit that it's unproven, and accept that that's why it isn't taken seriously by scientists. RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
May 19, 2018 at 6:13 pm
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2018 at 6:14 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Seems like eight of his ten are just different ways of griping about the same thing. More the conclusions of observations than some foundational dogma. : shrugs :
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
(May 19, 2018 at 12:44 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Is contemporary science based on 10 dogmas, or is Sheldrake full of shit? I can not answer honestly since I endured less than three minutes of this presuppositional bullshit.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
(May 19, 2018 at 6:13 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Seems like eight of his ten are just different ways of griping about the same thing. More the conclusions of observations than some foundational dogma. : shrugs : I think he just needs to have it out with Richard Dawkins... that's what my dad (a Christian) said... just stick 'em in a room together and lock the door |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Let's talk about bias!!! | Quick | 51 | 7617 |
May 14, 2018 at 9:54 pm Last Post: chimp3 |
|
Should we ever foster delusion? | shadow | 36 | 8139 |
July 30, 2017 at 8:02 pm Last Post: bennyboy |
|
Let's talk about morality | EruptedCarcassBloat | 0 | 769 |
October 18, 2016 at 9:20 am Last Post: EruptedCarcassBloat |
|
Ego-- harmful delusion or pragmatic necessity? | bennyboy | 28 | 6802 |
May 6, 2015 at 4:34 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
My perspective - truth or delusion? | Mystic | 22 | 12092 |
June 10, 2012 at 9:10 am Last Post: genkaus |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)