(May 21, 2018 at 8:24 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:23 pm)Hammy Wrote: You like Michael Behe.

He's a brilliant scientist who stands in the face of the scientific community and of power because he has truth on his side.

So you believe truth flies in the face of the scientific community and yet you come here to argue for God from science? LOL.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:27 pm)Kit Wrote: Impossible according to his small-mindedness, certainly, because he's so caught up in his god bias that he cannot imagine anything actually occurring without the fictional fiend.

He uses science to prove it.

What you call science, real scientists call your gullibility.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:33 pm)Hammy Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:24 pm)CDF47 Wrote: He's a brilliant scientist who stands in the face of the scientific community and of power because he has truth on his side.

So you believe truth flies in the face of the scientific community and yet you come here to argue for God from science? LOL.

I believe there is an agenda and a bias against DNA information, molecular machines, universe fine-tuning, the Big Bang,....

---

(May 21, 2018 at 8:34 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: He uses science to prove it.

What you call science, real scientists call your gullibility.

Wrong, all serious scientists respect the sophistication of DNA and encoding of proteins, molecular machines, fine-tuned universe,...

(May 21, 2018 at 8:35 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Wrong, all serious scientists respect the sophistication of DNA and encoding of proteins, molecular machines, fine-tuned universe,...

Indeed, yet they're not unreasonably inserting the god delusion into it.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:38 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:35 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Wrong, all serious scientists respect the sophistication of DNA and encoding of proteins, molecular machines, fine-tuned universe,...

Indeed, yet they're not unreasonably inserting the god delusion into it.

Many of them know it must have been created.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:39 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Many of them know it must have been created.

What they think and what they assert are two separate things. A real scientist does not inject his bias into his work.

The evidence (in this thread) reveals that poster CDF47 presents rather infantile mere assertions, strawmen, and other informal logical fallacies, along with factual inaccuracies/misrepresentations/lies and personal opinions/beliefs in virtually every post he has made (over 800 posts), all within a few weeks.

This leads me to conclude with high probability that:

1)  Poster CDF47 was and continues to be indoctrinated and infected with a particular virulent strain of the Christian God Virus.

2)  Poster CDF47's curiosity, intellectual honesty and critical thinking processes have been severely damaged and atrophied by this indoctrination.

3)  Poster CDF47's broad and deep willful ignorance will remain so but only by choice and/or addiction.

4)  Poster CDF47 is quite young and may have time to heal from the psychological, emotional and intellectual harm he has experienced provided he puts in the hard work to do so.

I wish him good fortune.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:40 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:39 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Many of them know it must have been created.

What they think and what they assert are two separate things.  A real scientist does not inject his bias into his work.

ID can make predictions based on their knowledge, just how they predicted junk DNA is not really junk but functional in some way.  Since then they found it is noncoding DNA and is at least 85 percent functional and operates like an operating system.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:42 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:40 pm)Kit Wrote: What they think and what they assert are two separate things.  A real scientist does not inject his bias into his work.

ID can make predictions based on their knowledge, just how they predicted junk DNA is not really junk but functional in some way.  Since then they found it is noncoding DNA and is at least 85 percent functional and operates like an operating system.

A prediction is not knowledge. ID may make predictions, but science makes a hypothesis. Learn the difference.

(May 21, 2018 at 8:44 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 21, 2018 at 8:42 pm)CDF47 Wrote: ID can make predictions based on their knowledge, just how they predicted junk DNA is not really junk but functional in some way.  Since then they found it is noncoding DNA and is at least 85 percent functional and operates like an operating system.

A prediction is not knowledge.  ID may make predictions, but science makes a hypothesis.  Learn the difference.

They made hypothesis.