(July 22, 2018 at 2:54 am)robvalue Wrote: I think this guy is just messing with us.

I think this guy messed with himself with a few too many doses of crack cocaine.

The difference between science and theology can be summed up in one word: testability.

(July 22, 2018 at 3:32 am)robvalue Wrote: The difference between science and theology can be summed up in one word: testability.

True that but, the problem with theology and science is gurus! Do you really think that theology can prove God and science can negate God? That will never happen; never has, never will! Because God is NOT theology and God is NOT science! Nature IS nature and nature is neither God nor science!

Understanding nature through sciences is one thing. Understanding God through nature is another. Yet, those are two sides of the same coin. There are two things nature cannot do. One: she will NEVER prove the nonsense known to us as "theology". Two: she will NEVER prove the nonsense known as "particle theory"!

Surfers rule through waves! Catch a wave! "And your sittin' on top of the world"--The Beach Boys.

Never mind

(July 22, 2018 at 3:08 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(July 22, 2018 at 2:54 am)robvalue Wrote: I think this guy is just messing with us.

I think this guy messed with himself with a few too many doses of crack cocaine.

I've decided I like him.

(July 22, 2018 at 3:00 am)Haipule Wrote: What is the difference between theology and science? NOTHING! As stupid is what stupid thinks. There is a vast difference between knowledge and understanding.


Nature is a hippy chick, from Pa'ia, with hairy arm pits saying, "peace and love"! "Interplay and symphony"!


If you can't accept her simple modality: then you will only invent rocket science! Yet, every rocket is sent according to a egocentrism model of the universe! WHY?

Don't fuck with the hippy chick!

Why do rockets work via science then?

To quote Dawkins...

"Because it works......bitches"

(July 23, 2018 at 7:24 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote:

(July 22, 2018 at 3:00 am)Haipule Wrote: What is the difference between theology and science? NOTHING! As stupid is what stupid thinks. There is a vast difference between knowledge and understanding.


Nature is a hippy chick, from Pa'ia, with hairy arm pits saying, "peace and love"! "Interplay and symphony"!


If you can't accept her simple modality: then you will only invent rocket science! Yet, every rocket is sent according to a egocentrism model of the universe! WHY?

Don't fuck with the hippy chick!

Why do rockets work via science then?

To quote Dawkins...

"Because it works......bitches"

Rockets work and God works through the same vehicle--Nature! God is not theology! God is not Nature. Nature is not science! God is NOT supernatural, nor is that even necessary! God merely established nature so that we wouldn't have to be so confused! Science and theology fucked it all up! Is there a consensus in science? Is there a consensus of theology?

But if you say to me, "God's Word is theology"! Then we are gonna have words as "God is NOT thee Author of Confusion!" And, theology is totally fucked up! And that, according to God's simple words which He preserved for us so that me might enjoy life thrivingly, independent of science, that can't understand nature and, theology that can't understand God! And neither, thee art of breathing! Breathing is important to nature, God and us all!

Which breathing includes loving, drinking, partying and song! Sing me a song Abaddon! Lets pull the cork!

Let me try this again. Ok, we have phases of the moon visible, night and day, to us except the new moon. We see a waning and waxing moon to full day and night. We only watch solar and lunar eclipses. Why don't we see at least some black dot, during the day, in the sky during a new moon?

Unless the moon is behind the sun. Well, if during a new moon, the moon is behind the sun, then how is the moon NOT orbiting the sun and not the earth?

(July 27, 2018 at 3:46 am)Haipule Wrote: Let me try this again. Ok, we have phases of the moon visible, night and day, to us except the new moon. We see a waning and waxing moon to full day and night. We only watch solar and lunar eclipses. Why don't we see at least some black dot, during the day, in the sky during a new moon?

Unless the moon is behind the sun. Well, if during a new moon, the moon is behind the sun, then how is the moon NOT orbiting the sun and not the earth?

You can't be that stupid (or maybe you can, not for me to judge).

You don't see the new moon during the day because the sun isn't shining on it.  When you see the moon in any other phase during daylight hours, you only see the part illuminated by the sun, the rest of the moon - even though still there - looks like the rest of the sky.

You grasp that the sun is substantially more distant from us than the moon is, correct?

Boru