RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:10 pm
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 5:07 am
Thread Rating:
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:16 pm
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:23 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold/ mere anarchy is loosed on the world.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 6:30 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(September 23, 2018 at 6:08 pm)LastPoet Wrote: That's the archetype for the dunning-Kruger effect right there. And you appear to be a great example of a person existing inside an echo chamber... I just stated I'll accept any label you want to put on me. If you want to call me an idiot, i'll accept that. If you want to call me a moron, i'll accept that to. My point is, an idiot and a moron, consistently schools your best debater... This is has nothing to do with the dunning-kruger effect because I can provide indisputable evidence. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:32 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 6:34 pm by Angrboda.)
(September 23, 2018 at 6:29 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 6:08 pm)LastPoet Wrote: That's the archetype for the dunning-Kruger effect right there. All you're proving is that it is a result of the Dunning-Kruger effect. But whatever. Produce every debate you've ever had with Khem, and show that you've won at least half of them. And not just in your judgement, but indisputably. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 6:47 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 6:32 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 6:29 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: And you appear to be a great example of a person existing inside an echo chamber... You sure that's what you want? RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 7:00 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 7:23 pm by Angrboda.)
(September 23, 2018 at 6:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 6:32 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: All you're proving is that it is a result of the Dunning-Kruger effect. But whatever. Produce every debate you've ever had with Khem, and show that you've won at least half of them. And not just in your judgement, but indisputably. Sure. I'll start you off. Counting the two you've already claimed, you have to show indisputable evidence that you won at least two of the following debates, or produce additional debates that I've missed. https://atheistforums.org/thread-53040-page-13.html https://atheistforums.org/thread-45331-page-11.html https://atheistforums.org/thread-53099-p...90358.html https://atheistforums.org/post-1354255.html https://atheistforums.org/thread-41806-p...19791.html RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 7:22 pm
Huggy has the mistaken impression that if someone tells him "go fuck yourself, you dumb shit" that he has somehow won a debate.
BTW, that does happen to him a lot. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 7:25 pm
Oh, man. Why'd you have to start that?
Huggy, you realize he was just voted best debater like in high school? These are vanity elections for shits and giggles. Like 30 people vote, if that, compared to the how many who are actually members of this forum? Even if you have bested Khem in debates, which I'm sure you have given his tendency to be drunk and Southern, that really doesn't mean much. I'm not sure I've ever seen him have a serious debate on this forum. It's half serious, a quarter ass smoke and at least a quarter shooting the shit. It's no measure of your or his intellect. If you want to be intelligent or viewed as such, stop trying to say you're intelligent, and start actively bettering yourself intellectually every chance you get for your own satisfaction, not for some bullshit status. Fuck status. Be the best you. Learn stuff. Grow. Change, etc. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 7:41 pm
-Teresa
.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)