(September 30, 2018 at 5:09 pm)anjele Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 5:06 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I guess you forgot that this was the second Cosby trial? The first trial, the jury was deadlocked, so it clearly wasnt an open and shut case like you're pretending it to be.

Let me get this straight...your defense of Cosby is that he's black?

If that's not correct, your posts pretty much read that way.

Here, let me save you some time with your response...

Hey Dummy...

*emphasis mine*

I've never said that but If that's what your reading into my posts, then it's quite possible you just may be a white supremacist...

I've been stating all along that this clearly wasn't a fair trial, I never attributed it to race, but to the facts of the case. But since you admit to holding the point of view that my posts are specifically about race, I'll play along.

You're obviously fine with ones rights being violated (illegally obtained evidence being submitted) in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously five with the accuser giving contradicting testimony on multiple occasions in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with witnesses lying on the stand in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with the defense being prevented from presenting evidence that could possibly result in the acquittal of a black man.

Now, every one of those scenarios has been instrumental in putting innocent excuse me, black people (I almost forgot you see 'black' when you read my posts) behind bars, if you see nothing wrong with that, you just well may be a plain old white supremacist.

(September 30, 2018 at 5:57 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 5:09 pm)anjele Wrote: Let me get this straight...your defense of Cosby is that he's black?

If that's not correct, your posts pretty much read that way.

Here, let me save you some time with your response...

Hey Dummy...

*emphasis mine*

I've never said that but If that's what your reading into my posts, then it's quite possible you just may be a white supremacist...

I've been stating all along that this clearly wasn't a fair trial, I never attributed it to race, but to the facts of the case. But since you admit to holding the point of view that my posts are specifically about race, I'll play along.

You're obviously fine with ones rights being violated (illegally obtained evidence being submitted) in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously five with the accuser giving contradicting testimony on multiple occasions in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with witnesses lying on the stand in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with the defense being prevented from presenting evidence that could possibly result in the acquittal of a black man.

Now, every one of those scenarios has been instrumental in putting innocent excuse me, black people (I almost forgot you see 'black' when you read my posts) behind bars, if you see nothing wrong with that, you just well may be a plain old white supremacist.

It's not just this thread that I am basing my opinion on.

And Skippy, how do you know I am white?

That's right...you don't.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

---

---

White extremists and white supremacists are not the same thing.

White supremacist is simply another term for racist.

Racism is a system based on race.

Everyone seems to believe I'm defending Cosby because hes black, if that's your take on it fine.

I was only making the case that the trial was in no way a fair trial, but you want to make it about race.

therefore, if you're ok with the scenarios I just laid out in the conviction of a black man, then you're ok with the judicial system not affording a black man a fair trial.

What part of that isn't racist?

Rememb

---

(September 30, 2018 at 6:13 pm)anjele Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 5:57 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*

I've never said that but If that's what your reading into my posts, then it's quite possible you just may be a white supremacist...

I've been stating all along that this clearly wasn't a fair trial, I never attributed it to race, but to the facts of the case. But since you admit to holding the point of view that my posts are specifically about race, I'll play along.

You're obviously fine with ones rights being violated (illegally obtained evidence being submitted) in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously five with the accuser giving contradicting testimony on multiple occasions in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with witnesses lying on the stand in order to convict a black man.

You're obviously fine with the defense being prevented from presenting evidence that could possibly result in the acquittal of a black man.

Now, every one of those scenarios has been instrumental in putting innocent excuse me, black people (I almost forgot you see 'black' when you read my posts) behind bars, if you see nothing wrong with that, you just well may be a plain old white supremacist.

It's not just this thread that I am basing my opinion on.

And Skippy, how do you know I am white?

That's right...you don't.

You don't have to be white to be a white supremacist, you just have to believe in maintaining the system.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:36 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Racism is a system based on race.

Everyone seems to believe I'm defending Cosby because hes black, if that's your take on it fine.

I was only making the case that the trial was in no way a fair trial, but you want to make it about race.

therefore, if you're ok with the scenarios I just laid out in the conviction of a black man, then you're ok with the judicial system not affording a black man a fair trial.

What part of that isn't racist?

Yes, Huggy, if you take everything that anyone says to you as evidence of racism then you are probably a racist fuck.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:40 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 6:36 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Racism is a system based on race.

Everyone seems to believe I'm defending Cosby because hes black, if that's your take on it fine.

I was only making the case that the trial was in no way a fair trial, but you want to make it about race.

therefore, if you're ok with the scenarios I just laid out in the conviction of a black man, then you're ok with the judicial system not affording a black man a fair trial.

What part of that isn't racist?

Yes, Huggy, if you take everything that anyone says to you as evidence of racism then you are probably a racist fuck.

Nah, just when they start arguing Alt right propaganda...

Besides, I'm apparently a rape apologist for arguing for a fair trial, so whats good for the goose..

Huggy, in all fairness, you made it about race wayyyyyy back in this thread. I do think race has a fair place in a discussion about a black man on trial in a historically racist country. However, it's not a factor in his guilt or innocence. Unless the judge or jury can be found guilty of racism, race isn't the issue here. If you agree with that, then maybe I misread your posts.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:41 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 6:40 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Yes, Huggy, if you take everything that anyone says to you as evidence of racism then you are probably a racist fuck.

Nah, just when they start arguing Alt right propaganda...

You consider me a racist and I never did any such thing. You're just being dishonest. Again.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:41 pm)Shell B Wrote: Huggy, in all fairness, you made it about race wayyyyyy back in this thread. I do think race has a fair place in a discussion about a black man on trial in a historically racist country. However, it's not a factor in his guilt or innocence. Unless the judge or jury can be found guilty of racism, race isn't the issue here. If you agree with that, then maybe I misread your posts.

I quoted a friend of the Constand family as saying they were racist, but that not me 'just bringing it up'; that speaks to the motive of the accuser, not the judicial system.

Whether or not race has played a part of this particular judicial process remains to be seen i.e the result of Harvey Wienstiens trial, othe than that I think that the prosecutor was overzealous, prosecution should never be about seeking conviction, it should be about seeking justice.

(September 30, 2018 at 6:50 pm)EHuggy74 Wrote:

(September 30, 2018 at 6:41 pm)Shell B Wrote: Huggy, in all fairness, you made it about race wayyyyyy back in this thread. I do think race has a fair place in a discussion about a black man on trial in a historically racist country. However, it's not a factor in his guilt or innocence. Unless the judge or jury can be found guilty of racism, race isn't the issue here. If you agree with that, then maybe I misread your posts.

I quoted a friend of the Constand family as saying they were racist, but that not me 'just bringing it up'; that speaks to the motive of the accuser, not the judicial system.

Huggy, let me ask you a question.  What do you think is the most reasonable explanation for the sixty women who have accused Cosby of sexual assault?