At work.

So, all that seems to be forth coming now is/are simply repeated assertions.

No explanations to questions seeking further expansion upon other questions asked.

Such as: Why does terrestrial DNA use a 'Pentose' (5-sided) sugar backbone when 'Hexonucleic acid' (6-sided) is quite do-able/possible?

Instead of a cardohydrate sugar why isn't an amino acid chain (Peptide backbone) used? It's more structurally stable and robust at higher temperatures. (Terrestrial DNA falls apart above temperatures of 21.3' C [71' F] )

All CDF47 can seem to do is reply "Nuh-uh! Goddidit!"

(November 5, 2018 at 3:39 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: All CDF47 can seem to do is reply "Nuh-uh! Goddidit!"

Yeah, and according to our über engineer, he was so bad at godly engineering that he had to add a "spellchecker" in his "program" for DNA self replication. Just go back a few pages where he states this nonsense.  

(November 5, 2018 at 3:39 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

So, all that seems to be forth coming now is/are simply repeated assertions.

No explanations to questions seeking further expansion upon other questions asked.

Such as: Why does terrestrial DNA use a 'Pentose' (5-sided) sugar backbone when 'Hexonucleic acid' (6-sided) is quite do-able/possible?

Instead of a cardohydrate sugar why isn't an amino acid chain (Peptide backbone) used? It's more structurally stable and robust at higher temperatures.  (Terrestrial DNA falls apart above temperatures of 21.3' C [71' F] )

All CDF47 can seem to do is reply "Nuh-uh! Goddidit!"

Quite the sport it is, playing chess with pigeons. I used to find it more entertaining a few years ago. The conclusion is, that while the pigeon wins everytime, there might be people reading the exchange of thoughts. if he is against atheists, then he is doing a fine job, IMHO.

(November 5, 2018 at 4:11 am)CDF47 Wrote:

(November 4, 2018 at 6:36 am)Wololo Wrote: Mrm Inquisition for the first time in his life is being honest.  Here he's admitting he's got nothing but a nebulous and unformed belief based on no evidence and contradicting everything known about the universe.

Problem for us is that this adimission is an unconscious reflex, his admission will be ignored.

You wish.

You're the clown, I'm the homocidal maniac bent on taking over the galaxy:



And to imagine that episode came from the same Trek series with a worse grasp of evolution than you do! (though it's still not Dear Doctor levels of bad).

---

(November 5, 2018 at 11:01 am)CDF47 Wrote: When there is complex functional information there is a designer.  It is found in the DNA molecule.

Hey, idiot. The bullshit term is "complex specified information".

Keep your nonsense correct, boyo.

CD - how much complex functional information does your god designer have ?

He sounds awfully complex. I wonder who designed him ?