Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 4:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 14, 2018 at 7:09 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:
Quote:Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you
That's the sum totality of speciation
Everena: Show me even ONE example of it then and I will believe you.

Quote:Everena: False. They are the most important differences and are what make us so dramatically different from chimps in literally millions of ways.
Nope were still 96 percent similar .It's a drop in the genetic bucket 


Quote:Everena: It was a publicity stunt and we share only certain types of genes with some bugs and fruit, like 50% of disease causing genes and 85% of protein coding genes but only 50% of non-coding genes with mice, for example. That does not make us fruit or bugs or mice.
Nope try again
Everena: I don't have to try again. Those are facts you fool.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
[Image: icon_quote.jpg]LadyForCamus:
I’m a good luck turd? Cool! I’ve heard of a lucky rabbit’s foot before, but never a lucky turd!

Too bad, it's the shit![Image: Thumbs%20Up.png]
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 14, 2018 at 7:06 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 14, 2018 at 6:52 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Soul deficiency, I suppose.  That is why you're here, after all.  On the notion that all of this pain and suffering might polish the turd you are into the diamond you could be!
I am already the diamond. You're the turds and good luck turds.

(November 14, 2018 at 6:55 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Again false that's not the only form of genetic isolation or  speciation

Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.

Quote:In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (
T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sci...ervations/

Gee, that was tough.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 14, 2018 at 7:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Total bullshit from you, as usual. 
The definition of species is VERY precise, and in fact you have refuted NOTHING I presented. 
You are actually not even competent to comment on anything, as you have clearly demonstrated you are totally ignorant of Evolution, and how it works. 
Nice try at deflection from the fact you have been refuted. Totally. 

Now run along and play, sweetie. If you're a good girl, you can have some Tasty Plants, designed just for you.

Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.

(November 14, 2018 at 7:18 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(November 14, 2018 at 7:06 pm)Everena Wrote: I am already the diamond. You're the turds and good luck turds.


Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.

Quote:In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (
T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sci...ervations/

Gee, that was tough.
Everena: Not friggin plants. actual species with conscious life.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Look at the post above yours, dipshit.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.
Already been done your clinging to creationist excuses fails 

Quote:Not friggin plants. actual species with conscious life.
Moving the goal post will not save you
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 14, 2018 at 7:19 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 14, 2018 at 7:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Total bullshit from you, as usual. 
The definition of species is VERY precise, and in fact you have refuted NOTHING I presented. 
You are actually not even competent to comment on anything, as you have clearly demonstrated you are totally ignorant of Evolution, and how it works. 
Nice try at deflection from the fact you have been refuted. Totally. 

Now run along and play, sweetie. If you're a good girl, you can have some Tasty Plants, designed just for you.

Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.

(November 14, 2018 at 7:18 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sci...ervations/

Gee, that was tough.
Everena: Not friggin plants. actual species with conscious life.

Wow, you moved those goal posts quick! Plant life doesn’t count? Why not? *popcorn*
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 14, 2018 at 7:21 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Look at the post above yours, dipshit.

Everena: No, that was a friggin plant, not a species with conscious life.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
This is just proof Everena here to convince herself she's right not to converse
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.

Get lost bitch. The information is available to anyone with a 5th Grade education.
If you believe something, then it must be wrong.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life. Anomalocaris 4 1193 April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Music and DNA tahaadi 4 1587 September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Dr. Long proves life after death or no? Manga 27 8213 April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  "DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots Davka 28 8508 February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Aractus
  A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence freedeepthink 14 4302 October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: freedeepthink
  Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... Mudhammam 3 2355 January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Yeti DNA sequenced Doubting Thomas 2 1564 October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Science Proves God Pahu 3 2137 August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Human DNA Strain Detected Minimalist 10 5386 July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Junk DNA and creationism little_monkey 0 2081 December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)