(November 29, 2018 at 11:55 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(November 29, 2018 at 11:52 pm)Amarok Wrote: So again all those innocent creatures needed to suffer because a group did something and the only way your holy psychopath could think up to teach said lesson is to hurt all innocent creatures. That's simply sadistic .

It's due to the fall of man and disobedience to God.  Man listened to the devil rather than God.  God foreknew this would happen.

Explain how Adam and Eve could have been at fault if they didn't understand the concepts of good and evil beforehand? If God truly loved his creations, why did he make them imperfect and then punish them for behaving exactly the way he designed them to behave? If he was a truly loving father, why didn't he intervene when his children were being tempted? And while we're on the subject of Adam and Eve, kindly explain how a snake could talk when snakes lack the necessary vocal apparatus.

(November 30, 2018 at 3:16 am)Everena Wrote:

(November 30, 2018 at 3:10 am)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Did you know the first French fries weren't actually cooked in France? They were cooked in Greece.

I am going to venture a guess and say that you are a guy. Some of your silly stuff is pretty funny, but your insults are hideous, unwarranted and rude. And how in the world do you possibly justify saying that you have defeated any believer in any way? And I have never met CDF47 and have no idea what his real name even is, so your intuition is way off balance too. Explain though in what way you think you have defeated us, or anyone, with some riduculous atheist flying spaghetti monster cult.

---

(November 30, 2018 at 3:12 am)CDF47 Wrote: Almost there.

Should only be like 87 or so now.... We will probably have to reach 1000 tomorrow. I tried to start an argument with Naysayer, but I don't see it getting us very far.

Yeah, we will probably have to wait. It is 3 AM where I am at.

(November 30, 2018 at 3:41 am)Gwaithmir Wrote:

(November 29, 2018 at 3:26 pm)Everena Wrote: I am asking a few of you this question because I would like to know the argument that has you all so convinced.

So please take me to the argument that convinced you that complexity could spontaneously occur from simplicity. I don't care if you use your own words, or someone else's, but what argument is it that has you so convinced this could all come to be without an intelligent creator?

Here's an article on the probability of abiogenesis. There are dozens of links and references to follow. If you are an intellectually honest person, you will follow the evidence to a rational conclusion without preconceived biases. In other words, you will read the articles with the idea of understanding them.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html

I've already read all about A Bio Genesis. An intelligent creator would stlll definitely be required, because their only theory of how life came to be is that it "just all happened naturally dude" That is vague and it means nothing. Also, abiogenesis has been criticisized and refuted by numerous scientists, just so you know.

1. They did not re-create the correct environment for the time period this would have happened in the Miller-Urey research experiments.
2. Proteins don't bind under water, in fact they do just the opposite.
3. Louis Pasteur's 1859 experiment is widely seen as having settled the question of spontaneous generation and disproved abiogenesis. He boiled a meat broth in a flask that had a long neck that curved downward, like that of a goose or swan.


And there is a lot more reading you should do about this unproven hypothesis you are so convinced by, because no one in the science community really seems convinced

(November 30, 2018 at 3:40 am)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? It was two tired.

LOL

(November 30, 2018 at 3:42 am)Everena Wrote:

(November 30, 2018 at 3:36 am)Everena Wrote: Australa!

I'm right aren't I? If so, this is your song cuz your always at work 

 

Though t'is very sad about the affair that happened to the band after their international success with the tune.

Still... Flogging the Yanks in their stupid, bloody boat race was an awesome thing to watch.

Now-a-days my 'Fluffy music of choice' is more Thrash, Grunge, Goth, Industrial, Metal or any combination of the lot.

Not at work.

(November 30, 2018 at 4:00 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: explain how a snake could talk when snakes lack the necessary vocal apparatus.

Magic!

(November 30, 2018 at 4:00 am)Gwaithmir Wrote:

(November 29, 2018 at 11:55 pm)CDF47 Wrote: It's due to the fall of man and disobedience to God.  Man listened to the devil rather than God.  God foreknew this would happen.

Explain how Adam and Eve could have been at fault if they didn't understand the concepts of good and evil beforehand? If God truly loved his creations, why did he make them imperfect and then punish them for behaving exactly the way he designed them to behave? If he was a truly loving father, why didn't he intervene when his children were being tempted? And while we're on the subject of Adam and Eve, kindly explain how a snake could talk when snakes lack the necessary vocal apparatus.

They knew what was good and at risk.  They probably saw animals die so they knew what death was.  It was a miracle regarding the snake.  The devil was able to speak through it.

---

(November 30, 2018 at 4:10 am)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote:

(November 30, 2018 at 4:00 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: explain how a snake could talk when snakes lack the necessary vocal apparatus.

Magic!

No...Miracle!

The god of the bible is either a viscous, malicious, barbaric, scumbag, or it is an inept, blundering imbecile. There simply is no other way to veiw it, unless you're completely delusional.

(November 30, 2018 at 4:10 am)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote:

(November 30, 2018 at 4:00 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: explain how a snake could talk when snakes lack the necessary vocal apparatus.

Magic!

It's a met awhor, I mean metaphor and one you should probably spend a lot of time thinking about.

(November 30, 2018 at 4:22 am)no one Wrote: The god of the bible is either a viscous, malicious, barbaric, scumbag, or it is an inept, blundering imbecile. There simply is no other way to veiw it, unless you're completely delusional.

No, He is neither.  He is forgiving and loving but also wrathful and He hates sin, especially certain sins like a proud look.