(December 10, 2018 at 10:33 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: @!OP q

Nope.

Nope nope nope.

Thus the paradox of tolerance.  



I'm absolutely -not- tolerant of this shit.

Wonderfully to the point

---

(December 10, 2018 at 10:39 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 10, 2018 at 10:32 pm)Amarok Wrote: No it's not it a falsehood . You can't turn it into a religious belief . Again none's aren't a thing . Those journals are bullshit their reasoning is nonsense . You can't make ideology out of atheism nor religion you litterly can't do it .

That has happened to all ideologies.  It turns into something else.  Just because you adhere to one aspect of it doesn't define the whole.  When there are certain legalities attached to it, like government benefits and exemptions, then that's the definition we go by.  If you have some independent definition for yourself, that's your choice and I'm certainly not knocking you for it.  Regardless, what you're experiencing is exactly what has happened to every other major religion/ideology in the world.  Welcome to the party.

It was never ideology to start with so it can't turn into anything let alone another ideology . I don't adhere to anything because there is nothing to adhere too and yes what I'm stating is the whole wholly apart from myself . Legally being protected to not accept a proposition means nothing . It's not independent definition it's THEY DEFINITION and again it has nothing to do with me . It has nothing to do experience and again it's not a religion thus this comparison is false and there is no party . 

I don't know how I must repeat this atheism is the lack of non belief god that's it nothing else . Anything else has nothing to do with atheism not even legal protections from  religion .

(December 10, 2018 at 10:40 pm)Amarok Wrote:

(December 10, 2018 at 10:33 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: @!OP q

Nope.

Nope nope nope.

Thus the paradox of tolerance.  



I'm absolutely -not- tolerant of this shit.

Wonderfully to the point

---

(December 10, 2018 at 10:39 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: That has happened to all ideologies.  It turns into something else.  Just because you adhere to one aspect of it doesn't define the whole.  When there are certain legalities attached to it, like government benefits and exemptions, then that's the definition we go by.  If you have some independent definition for yourself, that's your choice and I'm certainly not knocking you for it.  Regardless, what you're experiencing is exactly what has happened to every other major religion/ideology in the world.  Welcome to the party.

It was never ideology to start with so it can't turn into anything let alone another ideology . I don't adhere to anything because there is nothing to adhere too and yes what I'm stating is the whole wholly apart from myself . Legally being protected to not accept a proposition means nothing . It's not independent definition it's THEY DEFINITION and again it has nothing to do with me . It has nothing to do experience and again it's not a religion thus this comparison is false and there is no party . 

I don't know how I must repeat this atheism is the lack of non belief god that's it nothing else . Anything else has nothing to do with atheism not even legal protections from  religion .

Merriam Webster Dictionary

Atheism 2b - : a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods

Quote:It's a loosely used term. 

It's an often misapplied term 

Quote:Get it? 

It's an often misapplied term 

Quote:You keep saying it has to be something, and it doesn't. 

Yes it does this doesn't refute that 

Quote:It applies to more things than are even being suggested by me and has been for many years. 

It's misapplied so again it's not more  

Quote:You just define it differently to fit whatever it is you want to believe,

Nope I simply don't misapply  it 

Quote:and it's fine, but your beliefs don't apply to everyone. 

Yes it does 

Quote:There, now you don't have to deny scientific journals

I do reject i'll conceived journals 

Quote:and accuse people of being in cults being they were singing.

They remain a cult 


So again you fail

(December 11, 2018 at 12:47 am)Amarok Wrote:

Quote:It's a loosely used term. 

It's an often misapplied term 

Quote:Get it? 

It's an often misapplied term 

Quote:You keep saying it has to be something, and it doesn't. 

Yes it does this doesn't refute that 

Quote:It applies to more things than are even being suggested by me and has been for many years. 

It's misapplied so again it's not more  

Quote:You just define it differently to fit whatever it is you want to believe,

Nope I simply don't misapply  it 

Quote:and it's fine, but your beliefs don't apply to everyone. 

Yes it does 

Quote:There, now you don't have to deny scientific journals

I do reject i'll conceived journals 

Quote:and accuse people of being in cults being they were singing.

They remain a cult 


So again you fail

Right, National Geographic is "ill-conceived" and singing makes someone part of a cult.  I can't buy into your dogma, so no point in continuing this.  bye bye.

Quote:Right, National Geographic is "ill-conceived"

It's article calling atheism a religion is no matter your appeals to authority 

Quote:and singing makes someone part of a cult. 

Straw man singing doesn't singing in a way that emulates religion is . 

Quote:I can't buy into your dogma,

Too bad it isn't dogma therefore you can't buy into it 

Quote:so no point in continuing this.  bye bye.

Yup you will keep repeating same errors