Is tolerance intolerant?

[Amarok]

@!OP q

Nope.

Nope nope nope.

Thus the paradox of tolerance.  



I'm absolutely -not- tolerant of this shit.

Wonderfully to the point

---

No it's not it a falsehood . You can't turn it into a religious belief . Again none's aren't a thing . Those journals are bullshit their reasoning is nonsense . You can't make ideology out of atheism nor religion you litterly can't do it .

That has happened to all ideologies.  It turns into something else.  Just because you adhere to one aspect of it doesn't define the whole.  When there are certain legalities attached to it, like government benefits and exemptions, then that's the definition we go by.  If you have some independent definition for yourself, that's your choice and I'm certainly not knocking you for it.  Regardless, what you're experiencing is exactly what has happened to every other major religion/ideology in the world.  Welcome to the party.

It was never ideology to start with so it can't turn into anything let alone another ideology . I don't adhere to anything because there is nothing to adhere too and yes what I'm stating is the whole wholly apart from myself . Legally being protected to not accept a proposition means nothing . It's not independent definition it's THEY DEFINITION and again it has nothing to do with me . It has nothing to do experience and again it's not a religion thus this comparison is false and there is no party . 

I don't know how I must repeat this atheism is the lack of non belief god that's it nothing else . Anything else has nothing to do with atheism not even legal protections from  religion .

[Rev. Rye]

[T0 Th3 M4X]

@!OP q

Nope.

Nope nope nope.

Thus the paradox of tolerance.  



I'm absolutely -not- tolerant of this shit.

Wonderfully to the point

---

That has happened to all ideologies.  It turns into something else.  Just because you adhere to one aspect of it doesn't define the whole.  When there are certain legalities attached to it, like government benefits and exemptions, then that's the definition we go by.  If you have some independent definition for yourself, that's your choice and I'm certainly not knocking you for it.  Regardless, what you're experiencing is exactly what has happened to every other major religion/ideology in the world.  Welcome to the party.

It was never ideology to start with so it can't turn into anything let alone another ideology . I don't adhere to anything because there is nothing to adhere too and yes what I'm stating is the whole wholly apart from myself . Legally being protected to not accept a proposition means nothing . It's not independent definition it's THEY DEFINITION and again it has nothing to do with me . It has nothing to do experience and again it's not a religion thus this comparison is false and there is no party . 

I don't know how I must repeat this atheism is the lack of non belief god that's it nothing else . Anything else has nothing to do with atheism not even legal protections from  religion .

Merriam Webster Dictionary

Atheism 2b - : a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods

[Amarok]

[T0 Th3 M4X]

[Amarok]

[T0 Th3 M4X]

[Amarok]

It's a loosely used term. 

It's an often misapplied term 

Get it? 

It's an often misapplied term 

You keep saying it has to be something, and it doesn't. 

Yes it does this doesn't refute that 

It applies to more things than are even being suggested by me and has been for many years. 

It's misapplied so again it's not more  

You just define it differently to fit whatever it is you want to believe,

Nope I simply don't misapply  it 

and it's fine, but your beliefs don't apply to everyone. 

Yes it does 

There, now you don't have to deny scientific journals

I do reject i'll conceived journals 

and accuse people of being in cults being they were singing.

They remain a cult 


So again you fail

[T0 Th3 M4X]

It's a loosely used term. 

It's an often misapplied term 

Get it? 

It's an often misapplied term 

You keep saying it has to be something, and it doesn't. 

Yes it does this doesn't refute that 

It applies to more things than are even being suggested by me and has been for many years. 

It's misapplied so again it's not more  

You just define it differently to fit whatever it is you want to believe,

Nope I simply don't misapply  it 

and it's fine, but your beliefs don't apply to everyone. 

Yes it does 

There, now you don't have to deny scientific journals

I do reject i'll conceived journals 

and accuse people of being in cults being they were singing.

They remain a cult 


So again you fail

Right, National Geographic is "ill-conceived" and singing makes someone part of a cult.  I can't buy into your dogma, so no point in continuing this.  bye bye.

[Amarok]

Right, National Geographic is "ill-conceived"

It's article calling atheism a religion is no matter your appeals to authority 

and singing makes someone part of a cult. 

Straw man singing doesn't singing in a way that emulates religion is . 

I can't buy into your dogma,

Too bad it isn't dogma therefore you can't buy into it 

so no point in continuing this.  bye bye.

Yup you will keep repeating same errors