(October 3, 2011 at 7:27 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Bah. They protest, but they adhere to no real ideology.
If you do not devote yourself to an ideal, how can you really prove to me that you won't be the first to leave at the sign of trouble?

Sorry mehmet but I MISSED YOUR INTRODUCTION THREAD!

Interesting avatar you have ..who is it??

People seem to be of the opinion that anarchy is simply one wanting to watch the world burn... Just like everything else, there are different degrees of it... As beautiful as the concept of chaos is, doesn't mean that absolute chaos is what I desire.

(October 3, 2011 at 11:06 am)frankiej Wrote: People seem to be of the opinion that anarchy is simply one wanting to watch the world burn... Just like everything else, there are different degrees of it... As beautiful as the concept of chaos is, doesn't mean that absolute chaos is what I desire.

It's not. I on the other hand, like order.
I was raised in order. Maybe I'm not as organized as I'd like to be now, but I certainly do not live in a chaotic manner.

I have never enjoyed order... Even as a child I hated organised things. I really don't know why, but it is how I feel... I think that when something is organised you have a set expectation... I hate expectations.

(October 3, 2011 at 8:47 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:

(October 3, 2011 at 7:27 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Bah. They protest, but they adhere to no real ideology.
If you do not devote yourself to an ideal, how can you really prove to me that you won't be the first to leave at the sign of trouble?

Sorry mehmet but I MISSED YOUR INTRODUCTION THREAD!

Interesting avatar you have ..who is it??

I think its this fella

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_II

But heres another mehmet

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_Ali_A%C4%9Fca

Seems the name is linked with violence.

The Mehmets of the world seem angry...

Quote:If you do not devote yourself to an ideal, how can you really prove to me that you won't be the first to leave at the sign of trouble?

What?

I need prove nothing to you; I don't care what you think. Nor is there any reason I can think of anyone should..


MY position; I think pure idealogues are naive at best, dangerous at worst. Such people rely on dogma in lieu of critical thinking.

ME? I'm a pluralist. I've yet to see any single ideology which is not deeply flawed and unworthy of total commitment.

The irony being that pluralism is in itself, an ideology.

My point being... US government is just filled with greedy assholes who want a lot of oil, and have trillions of dollars in debt.

(October 3, 2011 at 7:36 pm)Tiberius Wrote: The irony being that pluralism is in itself, an ideology.

Not the way I use it.