(October 5, 2011 at 9:54 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: No you don't, you are the liar.

Stat, you have a choice. You can come clean or the staff will simply post the evidence of your lies here. I care not.

Quote:You need to act more like an actual moderator and less like a child.

What you think I need to do is irrelevant. However, you should take into account that I am not the person who called you out.

(October 5, 2011 at 9:57 pm)Shell B Wrote: Stat, you have a choice. You can come clean or the staff will simply post the evidence of your lies here. I care not.

You don’t have to post anything; I already know you guys are probably disgraceful enough to google the other username I told you I have used in the past and found my profile on the dating site I met my wife on, which of course has not been updated in well over a year. So it most likely still says I am single and recently started working for the USFS. Am I right or am I right? You really should be ashamed for abusing your powers as moderators. I disclosed that information to you guys to remove the threat to my identity, not to have your waste your time stalking me on the internet.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:02 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: You don’t have to post anything; I already know you guys are probably disgraceful enough to google the other username I told you I have used in the past and found my profile on the dating site I met my wife on, which of course has not been updated in well over a year. So it most likely still says I am single and recently started working for the USFS. Am I right or am I right? You really should be ashamed for abusing your powers as moderators. I disclosed that information to you guys to remove the threat to my identity, not to have your waste your time stalking me on the internet.

That would explain why you frequent said site. Listen, stat, we've had pathological liars on here before. You wouldn't be the first. However, it would be more conducive to friendliness if you would admit your faults and move on. Just so you know, we gathered that information when we were making sure that you were who you said you were and not trying to oust someone you didn't like from another site. You were compliant with that, so why are you complaining now? Of course we googled you. If we just took your word for it, we wouldn't have been doing our jobs. Either way, it would be sort of unfair if we allowed you to keep lying to suit your arguments while withholding information from the rest of the community. We, or at least I, knew that you would react this way, but there you have it.

Oh, by the way, which dating website? You are inactive on one.

I do not frequent any of them you disingenuous Turd! I do not have an up-to-date or active profile on any dating site. You do realize that because of cookies and

(October 5, 2011 at 10:10 pm)Shell B Wrote: That would explain why you frequent said site. Listen, stat, we've had pathological liars on here before. You wouldn't be the first. However, it would be more conducive to friendliness if you would admit your faults and move on. Just so you know, we gathered that information when we were making sure that you were who you said you were and not trying to oust someone you didn't like from another site. You were compliant with that, so why are you complaining now? Of course we googled you. If we just took your word for it, we wouldn't have been doing our jobs. Either way, it would be sort of unfair if we allowed you to keep lying to suit your arguments while withholding information from the rest of the community. We, or at least I, knew that you would react this way, but there you have it.

Oh, by the way, which dating website? You are inactive on one.

I do not frequent any of them you disingenuous Turd! I do not have an up-to-date or active profile on any dating site. You do realize that because of cookies and registry files you can just login to Internet Explorer and it will say you are “active” or “online” on any site saved in your browser history right? Stop trying to prove an absurd point that you know nothing about. You are always whining about people pretending to know things about you, but then you are hypocritical enough to make assumptions about me with no evidence? This is still an abuse of administrative powers and should be taken care of immediately. I disclosed that information to resolve a serious issue, not to give you the ability to make assumptions about me. You should be ashamed.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I do not frequent any of them you disingenuous Turd!

Listen, you little fuck-nugget. There have been numerous times that you have pissed people right the fuck off and, surprising even to myself, I have argued on your behalf because you do not break the rules. Don't be a fucking cunt or I will lay aside my ethics. Remember, you snot-nosed little shit, I didn't call you out on it. I'm just following up.

Quote:I do not have an up-to-date or active profile on any dating site. You do realize that because of cookies and registry files you can just login to Internet Explorer and it will say you are “active” or “online” on any site saved in your browser history right?

You do realize that trying to convince me you haven't cleared your cookies in more than a year isn't helping your case, right?

Quote:Stop trying to prove an absurd point that you know nothing about.

Stop being a fucking punk who changes his story every time it suits his argument and I will be sure to stop.

Quote:You are always whining about people pretending to know things about you, but then you are hypocritical enough to make assumptions about me with no evidence?

Assumptions? Stat, I could have, at any time between then and now, presented any assumptions I had about you. I know your real name, your user names on other sites and the fact that you only use this name here so that you can tool around these forums like king shit of turd island. I never disclosed any of this and yet you are saying I am a hypocrite making assumptions? Hmm. Furthermore, I don't complain about people. I complain about you, you annoying little cock.

Quote:This is still an abuse of administrative powers and should be taken care of immediately.

Who do you suggest I take that up with?

Quote:I disclosed that information to resolve a serious issue, not to give you the ability to make assumptions about me. You should be ashamed.

Who should be ashamed? I assume you mean the entire staff. I'm just the one who happened to be here when you popped in, so don't get your panties up your ass on my account.

"disingenuous turd" "little fuck nugget." Keep it up guys! I'm getting alot of great insults from this.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I do not frequent any of them you disingenuous Turd! I do not have an up-to-date or active profile on any dating site.

Perhaps, but there is evidence to the contrary.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: You do realize that because of cookies and registry files you can just login to Internet Explorer and it will say you are “active” or “online” on any site saved in your browser history right?

I'm sorry, that was complete gibberish. Really. All that above means is that Internet Explorer keeps cookies and histories local to the user.

However, the websites that you visit do indeed display a last logged on date independent of your computer.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Stop trying to prove an absurd point that you know nothing about. You are always whining about people pretending to know things about you, but then you are hypocritical enough to make assumptions about me with no evidence?

...

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: This is still an abuse of administrative powers and should be taken care of immediately.

I think the real abuse is forcing our members to tolerate your duplicity for this long.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:17 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I disclosed that information to resolve a serious issue, not to give you the ability to make assumptions about me. You should be ashamed.

The issue was resolved.

This is different.

We've given your more than enough time to shape up.

Now it will become an either.

Don't make me complete the latter half of the aphorism.

(October 5, 2011 at 10:28 pm)Shell B Wrote: Listen, you little fuck-nugget. There have been numerous times that you have pissed people right the fuck off and, surprising even to myself, I have argued on your behalf because you do not break the rules.

Doing your job and standing up for someone who does not break any rules, how noble of you.

Quote: or I will lay aside my ethics.

You already have by alluding to information that was given to you only because of the assurance of full confidentiality.

Quote:You do realize that trying to convince me you haven't cleared your cookies in more than a year isn't helping your case, right?

I’ve never cleaned out my cookies. My wife’s old profile says she was online today and the computer she used to access it with is at her mom’s house. My wife has not been there in four months. Figure that one out Einstein.

Quote: Stop being a fucking punk who changes his story every time it suits his argument and I will be sure to stop.

My story has never changed, I have worked for the USDA for over two years now, I got married in March(something I even announced to a few users on here in PM). Stop accusing me of things I have not done.

Quote:Assumptions? Stat, I could have, at any time between then and now, presented any assumptions I had about you. I know your real name, your user names on other sites and the fact that you only use this name here so that you can tool around these forums like king shit of turd island. I never disclosed any of this and yet you are saying I am a hypocrite making assumptions? Hmm. Furthermore, I don't complain about people. I complain about you, you annoying little cock.

This is actually the name I use on forums to prevent unethical people like you from trying to steal my identity. This just happens to be one of the only forums I am still active on. I have used it on three others I can think of. That is why I was uncomfortable in disclosing my other username to you guys but was given full assurance it would only be used to resolve the issue at hand. I guess that was not the case, apparently it has been used to try and falsely prove I am a liar.

Quote:Who do you suggest I take that up with?

Whomever you have to give account to, you are not the top dog here, I know that.

Quote:Who should be ashamed? I assume you mean the entire staff. I'm just the one who happened to be here when you popped in, so don't get your panties up your ass on my account.

Nope, you and Rsaeesna are the only two who have used it inappropriately. I disclosed the information to Tack and Darwinian because I trust them. I am done talking to you, you are not worth my time. I can't believe I wasted my 1000th post on you I was saving that! :-)

---

(October 5, 2011 at 10:59 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Perhaps, but there is evidence to the contrary.

No there isn’t, people who met their future spouses on dating sites having out of date dating profiles is not evidence those people are not now married.

Quote: I'm sorry, that was complete gibberish. Really. All that above means is that Internet Explorer keeps cookies and histories local to the user.

The dating site’s online status is tied to the browser’s cookies, hence why my wife’s out of date and inactive profile says she is online right now even though she is 5,000 miles away from the computer she used to use to access that site. Her mom uses that same Windows profile and browser daily.

Quote: However, the websites that you visit do indeed display a last logged on date independent of your computer.

It’s not independent of the computer if the user’s windows profile saves cookies from their last login to that particular website.

Besides, even if I had logged onto a dating site, which I have not since March, that would not prove that I was not married or that I was being unfaithful.

Quote:Whomever you have to give account to, you are not the top dog here, I know that.

There is no top dog. However, if there were one, it would be the man who called you out initially.

Quote:Nope, you and Rsaeesna are the only two who have used it inappropriately.

You think we're the only ones that Googled you? I think we should have kept your alter ego, at this point.

Quote:to prevent unethical people like you from trying to steal my identity.

Don't be ridiculous. Why would I steal your identity? I know how much you make, remember?

(October 5, 2011 at 11:30 pm)Shell B Wrote: [
You think we're the only ones that Googled you? I think we should have kept your alter ego, at this point.

Shell, googling me was not what was inappropriate, I understand why that had to be done. Using the information you found to supposedly “call me out” is what is grossly inappropriate. I was given full assurance that information would only be used to resolve that one issue. It obviously was not, that’s a serious problem.

Quote:Don't be ridiculous. Why would I steal your identity? I know how much you make, remember?

No you don’t, that would mean you would know what job I hold and how long I have worked there, but since you claim I was lying about all that then you can’t also claim to know how much I make. Bummer.