History dumb people of america look at history this country was already run from a christian perspective and we had never done better. if anyone tells you differently they speaking to your fears and biases. History proves other wise. our history allowed in christianity allowed bigots to be bigots the dems to be dim our collective history even allowed 30k different version of christianity to spawn with out dark age centralized control.

Why would you allow someone to make you think any differently than what history already records?

---

(May 20, 2019 at 9:31 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:

(May 17, 2019 at 11:43 am)Drich Wrote: Ok so we seem to be on the same page of what she said...

However i do not think you understand the ramifications/costs that implementing 'women's rights' will cost every citizen. it start with freedom of religion.

I don't think you understand the difference between stating an opinion and threatening to take away the First Amendment. If she were president (I did not vote for her, btw), she would be president of a country where female genital mutilation and violence against women is already illegal.

again moron the house passed a amendment that she in that statement swore to sign.. Everything she promised to change in that video was in the bill, the same bill ted cruize said was the abolishment of the firt amendment. if she where in office our first amendment rights would now be a thing of the past! again 8 months ago this happened this is not speculation this is not me guessing this is recorded congressional history. and if she won according to that video she would have signed. plus she would have the senate along with the judges of the supreme court to back it!

She made a promise, her people in the house passed the changes she purposed and tried to sneak it by the senate while making noise about trump collusion.

Ted Cruz was wrong. Ted Cruz saying something doesn't make it so.

One could argue out first amendment rights are already going down the tube. Try talking to Julian Assange about freedom of the press, not to mention Edward Snowdin, And the woman's name that slipped my mind that spent time in solitary confinement for leaking information.

(May 23, 2019 at 9:34 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Ted Cruz was wrong. Ted Cruz saying something doesn't make it so.

HE READ FROM THE PURPOSED AMENDMENT!!!!

Watch the video before you speak out of total blind mutt/beaten dog loyalty to your party, you brain washed, cant think for yourself political zombie.

IT CLEARLY states the abolishment of freedom of speech, to be replaced with "Reasonable" Speech. Meaning the government dictates what is reasonable. how would you like it if bad mouthing a sitting president being a punishable offense?

---

(May 23, 2019 at 10:19 am)Chad32 Wrote: One could argue out first amendment rights are already going down the tube. Try talking to Julian Assange about freedom of the press, not to mention Edward Snowdin, And the woman's name that slipped my mind that spent time in solitary confinement for leaking information.

there is a difference between hacking and leaking secret or top secret info, and speaking you mind about a political figure. The Dims don't want to be told their emperor has no cloths. they wish to believe that if you can't see his cloths it is because you are not special... and can not do so when people like the non liberal news media is reminding them that they are all stuid for believing in people with stupid ideas just because they are apart of the 'party.' *Cough Occassio.

The kind of stuff they leaked should not be secret, though. The media should hold politician's feet to the fire, and not be stenographers to power. That's why both of our choices for president sucked in 2016.

(May 23, 2019 at 12:35 pm)Chad32 Wrote: The kind of stuff they leaked should not be secret, though. The media should hold politician's feet to the fire, and not be stenographers to power. That's why both of our choices for president sucked in 2016.

lol... you think the media did not scrutinize trump when a candidate?

(May 23, 2019 at 1:16 pm)Drich Wrote:

(May 23, 2019 at 12:35 pm)Chad32 Wrote: The kind of stuff they leaked should not be secret, though. The media should hold politician's feet to the fire, and not be stenographers to power. That's why both of our choices for president sucked in 2016.

lol... you think the media did not scrutinize trump when a candidate?

Not nearly enough. The dems built him up, thinking they could beat him, like filming an empty podium for Trump instead of filming Bernie. Except then they lost, because Hillary couldn't rig the general.

(May 23, 2019 at 1:23 pm)Chad32 Wrote:

(May 23, 2019 at 1:16 pm)Drich Wrote: lol... you think the media did not scrutinize trump when a candidate?

Not nearly enough. The dems built him up, thinking they could beat him, like filming an empty podium for Trump instead of filming Bernie. Except then they lost, because Hillary couldn't rig the general.

not for the lack of trying... In truth do you honestly think burney had any real chance? Your own party didn't think so which is why the super delegates put clinton into that position! 

Honestly only about 1/3 of you douchers want to live in a modified 4th reich.. most of you still understand that socialism is a non functioning ideal who's had it's time over and over again. 

The only time it works is in a *athem a racially pure society where everyone from birth is made and expected to toe the line. and even then (vensulaia) there are no guarantees.

Why? lazy people.

And that's the problem here.. only the most lazy among the population want socialism/redistribution of wealth. and when enough people subscribe to this line of thought to make it a reality... there is not enough wealth to be redistributed for everyone..

a lot of people are behind him. I know socialism is demonized in America, but a lot of us are ready for a change. half the country is independent for a reason. Both major parties suck, and we're going down the tubes unless something happens. I think it is telling that Hillary couldn't defeat him without the superdelegates, in a rigged primary that she controlled. That's how bad a candidate she really was.

(May 21, 2019 at 11:17 am)Drich Wrote: History dumb people of america look at history this country was already run from a christian perspective and we had never done better.

You are going off topic. This topic is not about whether US is a christian country but what would be Christian utopia. Because even in US Christian leaders are crying for it to be more Biblical and Christian





And even you want to make changes like when you said in earlier post "creationism would be taught along side evolution"