The cumulative explanation for evolution is so strong that at this point, if a 100 million-year-old bunny fossil were found, a more reasonable explanation for its existence than evolution being wrong would be time travel. We don't have any physics that says it's impossible, but the proverbial pre-Cambrian bunny alone is incapable of disproving evolution, IMHO.

(December 31, 2019 at 2:20 am)Interaktive Wrote: I do not believe physicists and biologists

I'd like you to scream that the next time you enter a hospital.

(December 31, 2019 at 2:20 am)Interaktive Wrote: I do not believe physicists and biologists

Hawking did not prove that the universe is 14 billion years old and that there was a beginning
Turok has not proved that the universe is cyclical
it's all pro-Christian and pro-Buddhist philosophy

Biologists have not proven that abiogenesis is true or biogenesis

Darwin and his evolution can be refuted if they find a rabbit in Precambrian

etc

Hawking was not really involved in the determination of the age of the universe. If you would like to learn a few things about the evidence and how physicists think about the big bang, feel free to ask. It's your lucky day, I have a PhD in theoretical physics and have done research on general relativity and dark matter among other things.

At work.

(December 31, 2019 at 12:46 pm)Alex K Wrote: Hawking was not really involved in the determination of the age of the universe. If you would like to learn a few things about the evidence and how physicists think about the big bang, feel free to ask. It's your lucky day, I have a PhD in theoretical physics and have done research on general relativity and dark matter among other things.

Hello!

Would you mind if I ask you a few questions as well ?

So... to paraphrase a Proffesor Heterodyne minion I garner Mr Stephen Hawking was a 'Shmott guy'.

What were his academic levels? What were his fields of expertis and such?

I've read that one of his contributions to knowledge was 'Hawking radiation'. Might you expand for the lay-man?

What is the tale revolving around the lost bet regarding naked singularitys?

Much cheer for the new years.

And I don’t believe in if anymore...

but have you even so much as to want to?

(December 31, 2019 at 2:20 am)Interaktive Wrote: I do not believe physicists and biologists

Hawking did not prove that the universe is 14 billion years old and that there was a beginning
Turok has not proved that the universe is cyclical
it's all pro-Christian and pro-Buddhist philosophy

Biologists have not proven that abiogenesis is true or biogenesis

Darwin and his evolution can be refuted if they find a rabbit in Precambrian

etc

Your determination to remain ignorant is your problem, not ours. End of discussion.

Interaktive, gravity is fake too. You can reveal the truth to the world. Just go up to the observation deck on the Empire State Building...

You are free to dismiss any factual evidence you want.
You don't have to believe any of it.

You are free to be ignorant.
No one is forcing you to be educated.

Does this belief also extend to cell phones & computers ?
Do you believe that they don't work as described by countless scientific discoveries and published papers ?
Do you dismiss all the science that's involved them ?

Be careful shouting disbelief in science.  It will get it's feelings hurt and send you to liberal arts college.