Quote:Nah, I doubt that. Racist rednecks would be more honest and upfront about their feelings. 
They generally don't go to ridiculous/cowardly lengths in order to hide their hostility--which I can actually kind of respect on some level, tbh. 

I prefer interacting with them much more than dissimulative, liberal-type whites; always clamoring to make a show of imagined solidarity against the Big Bad Racists of the world--so long as n*****s play by their rules. 

Why there are still black people who are swayed or impressed by that sort of bullshit is beyond me.

Yes because arewethereyet so comes off as racist 

And what "rules"would those be? 

Well i can see why you like racists you both embrace similar bullshit . Good thing their are black people who have not followed you down the hole

---

Quote:Huggy, get your ass back in here right nah and ask this white woman what SHE thinks YOU should be talking about.  


LOLOLOL....

I don't know what drugs your on .But her original comment was clearly commenting on how huggy only shows up for one kind of thread . How the hell you got the idea she was telling what to comment on or how he should comment is beyond any reason .

---

Quote:Still maintaining she shouldn't have been referred to as a 'white woman' despite being provided with receipts that she has SELF-IDENTIFIED as such on this forum.

CONTINUES to suggest that she shouldn't have been laughed at for expressing her disapproval of blacks failing to broach topics relating to blackness in accordance to HER sensibilities under some fuckshit Spicy White/"POC" clause.

Man, oh man...What a clown.

If you can point out anywhere were she even implied her"disapproval of blacks failing to broach topics relating to blackness in accordance to HER sensibilities under some fuckshit Spicy White/"POC" clause." because it sure as hell wasn't on this thread 

Big Dumb Bootlicking Doggie is still dumb as fuck and still doesn't know how to quote properly--thoroughly unworthy of serious discussion in my book.
I don't have much patience for talking in circles with this blabbering moronic man-child, so I just ignore him 99% of the time.

I'm fine with letting him think that he's bested me with 'big ole brain', though. The dummy obviously needs some self-esteem.

(May 12, 2020 at 12:06 am)Athene Wrote: Big Dumb Bootlicking Doggie is still dumb as fuck and still doesn't know how to quote properly--thoroughly unworthy of serious discussion in my book.
I don't have much patience for talking in circles with this blabbering moronic man-child, so I just ignore him 99% of the time.

I'm fine with letting him think that he's bested me with 'big ole brain', though. The dummy obviously needs some self-esteem.

1. Lol pointing out you have not demonstrated she said what you say she said is not bootlicking .It's simply stating a fact .

2. Insulting my quoting is just a pathetic Red Herring. There is nothing wrong with my method of quoting.

3. Ad homs are not a response and simply shows you can't back up your accusation because if you could you would .

4. Coming from someone who's current comment consists of nothing but Ad Homs and Red Herrings . Who sounds more like a child here ?

5. Ultimately this whole comment is just a bunch of empty  bravado  and obvious attempts at covering your ass and saving face because you have been called out on your bullshit and can,t back it up with actual quotes .

Wonder why presumption of innocence applies to the two men who shot and killed Ahmaud, but not to Ahmaud himself.  

(May 12, 2020 at 9:32 am)Divinity Wrote: Wonder why presumption of innocence applies to the two men who shot and killed Ahmaud, but not to Ahmaud himself.  

Because black people are all thugs and violent gangbangers don't you know

The" they are no angel" defense

(May 12, 2020 at 9:42 am)SUNGULA Wrote:

(May 12, 2020 at 9:32 am)Divinity Wrote: Wonder why presumption of innocence applies to the two men who shot and killed Ahmaud, but not to Ahmaud himself.  

Because black people are all thugs and violent gangbangers don't you know

The" they are no angel" defense

But making up fake shit to paint people as racists is acceptable.



Interesting.

(May 12, 2020 at 9:46 am)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 12, 2020 at 9:42 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Because black people are all thugs and violent gangbangers don't you know

The" they are no angel" defense

But making up fake shit to paint people as racists is acceptable.



Interesting.

Leaving the race issue aside (for the moment - this remains a racially motivated crime), the younger McMichael committed a crime merely by pointing his shotgun at Arbery:

Quote: “A person commits the offense of simple assault when he or she … Commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.” 

So, we have two people committing multiple criminal offenses which resulted in the death of a third.

It is insane that anyone can possibly defend the McMichaels for ANYTHING they did relating to this incident.

Boru

(May 12, 2020 at 10:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 12, 2020 at 9:46 am)onlinebiker Wrote: But making up fake shit to paint people as racists is acceptable.



Interesting.

Leaving the race issue aside (for the moment - this remains a racially motivated crime), the younger McMichael committed a crime merely by pointing his shotgun at Arbery:

Quote: “A person commits the offense of simple assault when he or she … Commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury.” 

So, we have two people committing multiple criminal offenses which resulted in the death of a third.

It is insane that anyone can possibly defend the McMichaels for ANYTHING they did relating to this incident.

Boru

Where do you get that anyone is defending them?


We just have what the press has publicized - and some shit that idiots made up.....


Their guilt or innocence is for a jury to decide.

Not a bunch of armchair commandos.

(May 12, 2020 at 10:19 am)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 12, 2020 at 10:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Leaving the race issue aside (for the moment - this remains a racially motivated crime), the younger McMichael committed a crime merely by pointing his shotgun at Arbery:




So, we have two people committing multiple criminal offenses which resulted in the death of a third.

It is insane that anyone can possibly defend the McMichaels for ANYTHING they did relating to this incident.

Boru

Where do you get that anyone is defending them?


We just have what the press has publicized - and some shit that idiots made up.....


Their guilt or innocence is for a jury to decide.

Not a bunch of armchair commandos.

George Barnhill is defending them, citing their actions as ‘perfectly legal’.

I didn’t mean to imply that anyone here at AF was defending them. Sorry if it read that way.

Boru

(May 12, 2020 at 10:22 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 12, 2020 at 10:19 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Where do you get that anyone is defending them?


We just have what the press has publicized - and some shit that idiots made up.....


Their guilt or innocence is for a jury to decide.

Not a bunch of armchair commandos.

George Barnhill is defending them, citing their actions as ‘perfectly legal’.

I didn’t mean to imply that anyone here at AF was defending them. Sorry if it read that way.

Boru

My mistake.

Of course he could be right.

It may be perfectly legal.


According to German law circa 1943 it was perfectly legal to round up Jews and exterminate them.


It made it no less mind-bogglingly insanely evil  - but it was "legal".