(May 19, 2020 at 9:36 am)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 8:43 am)Brian37 Wrote: If I were a prosecutor I would bring this up. Seems like this is a family affair.

Were you a prosecutor who was prone to bringing up irrelevant yet inflammitory events in court - your career would be rather short.

Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

(May 19, 2020 at 6:02 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 9:36 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Were you a prosecutor who was prone to bringing up irrelevant yet inflammitory events in court - your career would be rather short.

Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

Better do some re-reading you nozzle.

I never said anything of the sort.

My position is the same -

We don't know.

We can't know.

We have not seen all the evidence available.

...

Your simplistic view is nothing more than your ignorance multiplied by your bias.

(May 19, 2020 at 6:02 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 9:36 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Were you a prosecutor who was prone to bringing up irrelevant yet inflammitory events in court - your career would be rather short.

Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

But the photo the sister took is irrelevant in the sense that it would do nothing to prove or disprove the crime of murder. We know that Mr. Arbery is dead as a result of gunshot wounds inflicted by Mr. McMichael - these facts are not in dispute, and the photo does nothing to alter that. If she had provided video of the shooting from a different vantage, things might be different.


Boru

(May 19, 2020 at 6:47 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 6:02 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

But the photo the sister took is irrelevant in the sense that it would do nothing to prove or disprove the crime of murder. We know that Mr. Arbery is dead as a result of gunshot wounds inflicted by Mr. McMichael - these facts are not in dispute, and the photo does nothing to alter that. If she had provided video of the shooting from a different vantage, things might be different.


Boru

But it does exactly what Hugly intended - trys to bias others to his likes...

(May 19, 2020 at 6:47 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 6:02 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

But the photo the sister took is irrelevant in the sense that it would do nothing to prove or disprove the crime of murder. We know that Mr. Arbery is dead as a result of gunshot wounds inflicted by Mr. McMichael - these facts are not in dispute, and the photo does nothing to alter that. If she had provided video of the shooting from a different vantage, things might be different.


Boru

It shows the mentality of her family, the photo was a souvenir, why else take a pic?

---

(May 19, 2020 at 6:23 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 19, 2020 at 6:02 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: Hold up, wasn't it your position in the beginning of this thread that there wasn't any evidence to prove murder?

Seems like your career as a prosecutor would be just as short.

Better do some re-reading you nozzle.

I never said anything of the sort.

My position is the same -

We don't know.

We can't know.

We have not seen all the evidence available.

...

Your simplistic view is nothing more than your ignorance multiplied by your bias.

I didn't say that you SAID those exact words, I said it was your POSITION.

(May 8, 2020 at 2:15 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 8, 2020 at 2:10 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: They weren't even arrested at the time for what certainly looks like murder.

And you based this account from what evidence?

Muder is simply killing someone intentionally, the perpertrators had no legal grounds to apprehend the victim which is a fact.

Quote:It shows the mentality of her family, the photo was a souvenir, why else take a pic?

It shows her mentality.  It says nothing about the motive of her father and brother (means and opportunity are not in dispute). The only purpose of such a photo as evidence would be to play on the emotions of the jury, and that's not how trials are meant to work.

I have no doubt she took the photo as a souvenir, which strikes me as pretty fucking sick.  But it still shouldn't be admitted as evidence, because it adds nothing factual to the case.

And just to be clear, I DO think this was a murder, and I would like to see the two men sent to prison for the rest of their lives.

Boru

Jesus fucking christ.


Go beat a different dead horse you ass.


My position is exactly what I said.

I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT. NOR DO YOU.

Got that? Or do you need fucking pictures?

(May 20, 2020 at 7:10 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Jesus fucking christ.


Go beat a different dead horse you ass.


My position is exactly what I said.

I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT. NOR DO YOU.

Got that? Or do you need fucking pictures?

I happily admit that my views on this matter are highly prejudicial and based on incomplete evidence.

Boru

(May 20, 2020 at 7:36 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 20, 2020 at 7:10 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Jesus fucking christ.


Go beat a different dead horse you ass.


My position is exactly what I said.

I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT. NOR DO YOU.

Got that? Or do you need fucking pictures?

I happily admit that my views on this matter are highly prejudicial and based on incomplete evidence.

Boru

My appologies.

That was directed at Hugly. Not you.

The wall of text quoting was just getting annoying.

(May 20, 2020 at 7:40 am)onlinebiker Wrote:

(May 20, 2020 at 7:36 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I happily admit that my views on this matter are highly prejudicial and based on incomplete evidence.

Boru

My appologies.

That was directed at Hugly. Not you.

The wall of text quoting was just getting annoying.

Fair enough. Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Apo accepted (though not needed).

Boru