Posts: 11353
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 15, 2020 at 7:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 15, 2020 at 8:02 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Right wing forge hoax flyer to bash BLM
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blm-fl...of-people/
One thing i always laugh at is the Republican talking point that blacks have been "tricked " into supporting Dems . This is hilarious as it assumes black people and dumb and easily deceived.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 541
Threads: 18
Joined: December 9, 2018
Reputation:
0
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 3:35 am
(June 15, 2020 at 1:05 pm)Drich Wrote:
(June 12, 2020 at 1:47 pm)Agnostico Wrote: No one here is condemning CHAZ and im not surprised... why not?
Cos I've learnt what atheists are like on this forum. They either make excuses for crime, downplay it or ignore it completely
Posts: 11353
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 3:37 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2020 at 3:40 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Cos I've learnt what atheists are like on this forum. They either make excuses for crime, downplay it or ignore it completely
No you have not , And no we do not .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 35358
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 3:47 am
(June 16, 2020 at 3:35 am)Agnostico Wrote: (June 15, 2020 at 1:05 pm)Drich Wrote:
why not?
Cos I've learnt what atheists are like on this forum. They either make excuses for crime, downplay it or ignore it completely
I'd appreciate it if you didn't lie for or about me.
That's the polite version.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 11353
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 3:48 am
(June 16, 2020 at 3:47 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: (June 16, 2020 at 3:35 am)Agnostico Wrote: Cos I've learnt what atheists are like on this forum. They either make excuses for crime, downplay it or ignore it completely
I'd appreciate it if you didn't lie for or about me.
That's the polite version. Isn't that also technically against the rules ?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 46535
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 4:47 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2020 at 4:47 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(June 16, 2020 at 3:48 am)SUNGULA Wrote: (June 16, 2020 at 3:47 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: I'd appreciate it if you didn't lie for or about me.
That's the polite version. Isn't that also technically against the rules ?
That’s the trouble with the Rules - we have no way to force you to read them so we get a fuckload of frivolous fucking reports from people who think a rule has been broken when NO rule has been broken and we (Staff) - even though we have repeatedly explained how the report system works, what it’s for and how to use it - now have to take time to read and discuss a report that has been made because someone thinks that they can somehow understand a relatively short list of rules that they either haven’t read or don’t understand and I’m really glad there isn’t a rule prohibiting run-on sentences but that doesn’t really matter, since all that it would take for someone to report this post is to imagine that such a rule exists.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 11353
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 10:40 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2020 at 10:40 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(June 16, 2020 at 4:47 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (June 16, 2020 at 3:48 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Isn't that also technically against the rules ?
That’s the trouble with the Rules - we have no way to force you to read them so we get a fuckload of frivolous fucking reports from people who think a rule has been broken when NO rule has been broken and we (Staff) - even though we have repeatedly explained how the report system works, what it’s for and how to use it - now have to take time to read and discuss a report that has been made because someone thinks that they can somehow understand a relatively short list of rules that they either haven’t read or don’t understand and I’m really glad there isn’t a rule prohibiting run-on sentences but that doesn’t really matter, since all that it would take for someone to report this post is to imagine that such a rule exists.
Boru Okay
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 5942
Threads: 112
Joined: January 8, 2016
Reputation:
50
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 10:41 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2020 at 10:41 am by Aegon.)
Leftists aren't anti-gun. Centrist liberals are. This has been a public service announcement.
Somehow Americans have been brainwashed into thinking anybody left of Ronald Reagan is a communist. How stupid and unfortunate.
Posts: 11353
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 11:59 am
(June 16, 2020 at 10:41 am)Aegon Wrote: Leftists aren't anti-gun. Centrist liberals are. This has been a public service announcement.
Somehow Americans have been brainwashed into thinking anybody left of Ronald Reagan is a communist. How stupid and unfortunate. Some people conflate the two 
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: is Seattle the new fort Sumter?
June 16, 2020 at 12:15 pm
(June 16, 2020 at 10:41 am)Aegon Wrote: Leftists aren't anti-gun. Centrist liberals are. This has been a public service announcement.
Somehow Americans have been brainwashed into thinking anybody left of Ronald Reagan is a communist. How stupid and unfortunate.
Ronald Reagan was a failed Democrat. He is the yardstick for flip flopping and nothing else.
Show me one lefty who voted against Clinton's "assault weapon" bill. Or any other anti gun legislation.....
|
![[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]](https://external-preview.redd.it/nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWTNVY.jpg?width=216&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=7b11e8b38bea0eacc8797fc971574ddc2a24480e)
