(September 30, 2022 at 3:08 pm)Helios Wrote:

(September 30, 2022 at 3:07 pm)Aegon Wrote: Sorry sir, but Krystal and Sagaar on Talking Points are legit. I would not classify them as "flaming garbage."

No, they are not

Oh okay, well when you put it like that, I guess I have to agree!

Find me one time they reported misinformation. Go.

When Biden shoves his hand down the back of his Depends and smears shit all over the wall - I expect the same people will be saying " Hey - You shit too!!"

(September 30, 2022 at 3:05 pm)Helios Wrote:

Quote:ut how is an election denier qualified for the job of Press Secretary when there are thousands of people out there, and black women at that, who were not election deniers? You can't answer that. Someone who hasn't denied an election would surely be preferable to someone who has denied an election, no? Why is denying elections not crossing a red line to you when there are thousands of other applicants out there for the job, and why should election denial not be a disqualifier when this person is supposed to have credibility in speaking on behalf of the current administration?

What the hell do her personal opinions about the 2016 election have to do with reading statements and taking questions from the press?

So you'd be fine with someone who posted that they think Trump won the 2020 election being the Press Secretary of the next Repub administration, and you don't think that type of disinformation should disqualify them? As long as you're consistent, but damn, that's surprising. Are you ok with her shooting puppies too? As long as it's in her own time, right? Doesn't impact her reading talking points, right?

So, are we talking about the 2016 or the 2020 election?

From what I have been reading here she denies the outcome of the 2016 election. Which has fuck all to do with the 2020 election.

Quote:So you'd be fine with someone who posted that they think Trump won the 2020 election being the Press Secretary of the next Repub administration, and you don't think that type of disinformation should disqualify them? As long as you're consistent, but damn, that's surprising. Are you ok with her shooting puppies too? As long as it's in her own time, right? Doesn't impact her reading talking points, right

Nope believing in THE BIG LIE instantly disqualifies them from any government office. Karine Jean-Pierrehe's belief about 2016 is a personal opinion. THE BIG LIE is a political rallying cry for insane anti-democratic forces and insurrectionists and having someone in that position gives those loons credibility they shouldn't have. Also committing animal abuse and holding an opinion are two different things.

(September 30, 2022 at 3:09 pm)Aegon Wrote:

(September 30, 2022 at 3:08 pm)Helios Wrote: No, they are not

Oh okay, well when you put it like that, I guess I have to agree!

Find me one time they reported misinformation. Go.

Sagaar spew "don't say gay bill" nonsense and Krystal for once actually acts like a leftist and actually calls him out on his bullshit.

(September 30, 2022 at 3:27 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: So, are we talking about the 2016 or the 2020 election?

From what I have been reading here she denies the outcome of the 2016 election.  Which has fuck all to do with the 2020 election.

Denying an election is denying an election. Doesn't matter what year it was. Undermining democracy and the democratic process and all.

Quote:Denying an election is denying an election. Doesn't matter what year it was. Undermining democracy and the democratic process and all.

Ones a personal opinion the other is a dangerous political movement

(September 30, 2022 at 3:43 pm)Helios Wrote:

Quote:Denying an election is denying an election. Doesn't matter what year it was. Undermining democracy and the democratic process and all.

Ones a personal opinion the other is a dangerous political movement

Thanks for admitting you have no moral consistency and are completely ok with election denial, and admitting that you are just playing team sports here.

Quote:Thanks for admitting you have no moral consistency and are completely ok with election denial, and admitting that you are just playing team sports here.

There is nothing morally inconsistent about having no issue with someone holding a personal belief that in no way impacts their job and not being okay with a member of a dangerous Anti Democratic political movement giving credibility to that movement by holding that job. That's not" team sports".