Wonderful. Thanks for going into that, I'm a little clearer on it now.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2024, 7:16 pm
Poll: Are we free or determined? This poll is closed. |
|||
Free | 13 | 59.09% | |
Determined | 9 | 40.91% | |
Total | 22 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Determinism.....
|
(October 11, 2009 at 3:45 am)Arcanus Wrote: Describes his will? Sort of. Our conative faculties inform and influence our will, and the instantiation of our will is the volitional activity called choice. You know I really dont understand what you are saying. At times it seems like you agree we are free and at others you seem to say we are determined. Obviously it is because you agree with compatibilism, but compatibilism just seems like determinism with free will defined slightly differently to make it sound nice. Agree that we will always act in accordance with our will, so there will only be one option we will choose and that we are the cause of our own actions, but then in the second to last sentance you say determinism is real. So do you believe our lives couldn't ever have gone any differently, that our choices are in fact a combination of genetics and events happening to us, or that somehow there is a cross roads where a free mind can choose ether left or right? If not then how can we be morally responsible if we are a mere product of our birth and enviroment. Heres my current problem; say I do a good thing. Why do I choose to do that rather than another thing. Is it a combination of nature and nurture, but if that is true it gives no area for a free will to act. If nature and nurture just give a tendency to act a certain way then it might be possible to act freely. But then why would a free will choose to act one way rather than another? If two people are given the same good opportunity to do why would one choose good and the other choose evil if 'nature and nurture' only gives a tendency towards good or evil, how can we make a free choice between the two. We can't have a natural virtue to do good since that is deterministic and it can't be random since random isn't free. I seem to be finding more problems with freedom, can anyone explain.... if what I have said makes sense that is lol.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
I for one reject determinism because of the fact that our actions directly affect our future, we are at least to an extent self-determining, and if we have any input what-so-ever into the future then there is no determinism because the future is the sum of the past up until the present, and the past contains decision.
.
(October 12, 2009 at 11:41 am)solarwave Wrote: Compatibilism just seems like determinism with free will defined slightly differently to make it sound nice. Free will is not being defined differently so much as properly, foremost by the rejection of "free will" as a misnomer because the will is not free. I once shared your confusion because, perhaps like you, I persisted in the notion that the will is free, but it was a confusion that disappeared when I let go of that idea, substituting it with "free agency" instead. But I had to be shown the incoherence of "free will"—how it creates a dissonance in our intuitions and is violently inconsistent with a biblical world view—before I was able to drop it and pursue a more coherent view. Indeterminism or "free will" simply does not work. But neither does determinism, which, when held consistently, results in the nihilistic repudiation of truth, knowledge, science, etc. Evidently the truth was somewhere in between. Ergo, compatibilism. It is coherent and consistent biblically, logically, intuitively, and scientifically. (October 12, 2009 at 11:41 am)solarwave Wrote: In the second-to-last sentence you say that determinism is real. So do you believe our lives couldn't ever have gone any differently, that our choices are in fact a combination of genetics and events happening to us? What I choose is determined by my will. What I will is determined by my character and desires. What my character and desires are is determined by my experiences and genetic makeup. What my experiences and genetic makeup are is determined by God. That is undeniably a causal series, so in one sense determinism is real. But as I had said, that causal chain runs through the agent's conative faculties, not irrespective of them but concordantly with them. And yet our conative and volitional faculties do not passively respond to this causal chain but in fact actively shape it. To put it another way: What we do is not irrespective of any reason, as indeterminism says, but for a reason; and that reason is not irrespective of us, as determinism says, but shaped by us. (October 12, 2009 at 11:41 am)solarwave Wrote: How can we be morally responsible if we are a mere product of our birth and environment? Because we are not automaton passively responding to the causal chain, but free agents actively shaping it. (October 12, 2009 at 11:41 am)solarwave Wrote: If two people are given the same opportunity to do good, why would one choose good and the other choose evil if "nature and nurture" only gives a tendency towards good or evil? How can we make a free choice between the two? We can't have a natural virtue to do good since that is deterministic, and it can't be random since random isn't free. Because there is more at operation than just "nature and nurture," which never inclines a man toward good at any rate but only evil (wherein the terms 'good' and 'evil' are being used consistent with the Christian view, not an anthropocentric view). That is, we do not have "a natural virtue to do good." The expression Augustine gave us for this condition was non posse non peccare (unable to not sin). Although everyone is naturally born and a slave to sin, some are later spiritually born and a slave to Christ. Only those spiritually born in Christ then have a tendency toward good or evil (posse peccare, posse non peccare) because of the additional operation of the Holy Spirit at work in their lives. Regeneration (Gk. gennao anothen, born of above) is the difference between those who choose to do evil and those who choose to do good (e.g., Phil. 2:13). Man's will is free in the sense that his choices are a product of his own faculties, his own intellect and desires, influenced by his own character and heart. But it is for those precise same reasons that man's will is not free, because man's character, intellect, desires, etc., altogether are corrupted under the bondage of sin. Consequently, the degree to which man's will is free is proportionate to the degree that man is free from his sinful nature. And for the unregenerate sinner, he is not free from his sinful nature at all.
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason. (Oscar Wilde) (October 2, 2009 at 4:23 am)solarwave Wrote: Hey, Depends, we can think for ourselves, we can make our own choices. But there are somethings that were pre-determined before we were born.
Depends what you mean 'make our own choices'. Do you mean the simple fact that we make choices, or do you mean that we can force our own choices despite the fact that the part of us that does the choosing, the part of that we call 'us', that we call our 'self'...is the brain and is what makes the choices. IOW: How can you control your brain with your brain? Your brain does the controlling!
Do you just mean the undeniable fact that we make choices? What do you mean by 'make our own'? As the poll I'm not voting because it's a false dichotomy, because I'd probably like to vote "neither". I am not sure whether I am an indeterminism or determinism, but I think I would support indeterminism due to what I've heard about Quantum Mechanics. I'm a bit on the dark about that matter. But I don't believe in "free will" because I don't think our will is "free", for reasons stated on this thread. I don't see how randomness, how indeterminacy can make your will "free". Freedom of possibility maybe, of fluctuation, but not freedom of Will, or IOW, not freedom of control. I'm what's known as a pessimistic incompatibilist then it seems, according to Wikipedia. Because I would say I believe in indeterminacy, at least Quantum indeterminacy , and I would say I was an indeterminist on the whole: But I nevertheless, don't believe in free will. EvF RE: Determinism.....
October 15, 2009 at 2:29 pm
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2009 at 2:33 pm by Amphora.)
(October 15, 2009 at 9:10 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Depends what you mean 'make our own choices'. Do you mean the simple fact that we make choices, or do you mean that we can force our own choices despite the fact that the part of us that does the choosing, the part of that we call 'us', that we call our 'self'...is the brain and is what makes the choices. IOW: How can you control your brain with your brain? Your brain does the controlling!Exactly your brain does the controlling! The BRAIN controls sensation, muscles, glandular activity, and the power to think and feel. From my esthetician book anatomy and physiology chapter nervous system part. (October 15, 2009 at 9:10 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Do you just mean the undeniable fact that we make choices?Yes. When I am thirsty I can choose to have a glass of water or what I am really thinking a nice cold beer sounds better. In the end I will decide. (October 15, 2009 at 9:10 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: What do you mean by 'make our own'?I can choose to go out tonight or not that is my choice. (October 15, 2009 at 9:10 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I'm what's known as a pessimistic compatibilist then it seems, according to Wikipedia. Because I would say I believe in indeterminacy, at least Quantum indeterminacy , and I would say I was an indeterminist on the whole: But I nevertheless, don't believe in free will. Oh so you believe: Quote: is the belief that free will and determinism are logically incompatible categories.[1] This could include believing that determinism is reality, therefore free will is an illusion (hard determinism), or that free will is true, therefore determinism is not (libertarianism), or even that neither determinism nor free will is true (pessimistic incompatibilism).[2] I found this on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibili...patibilism And that is your choice, you choose not to believe in free will. And thats ok. Amp
Freedom is the ability to march to the beat of a different drummer without fear of retribution. Secularone
Ignorance is bliss but understanding is wonderful. Atheist forums.org (October 15, 2009 at 2:29 pm)Amphora Wrote: Exactly your brain does the controlling! The BRAIN controls sensation, muscles, glandular activity, and the power to think and feel. From my esthetician book anatomy and physiology chapter nervous system part.Yes. It is simply doing what it is doing, and I am doing what I am doing. So at any given moment that is all I can do, so it doesn't make sense to blame people unless that has a good effect for the future: Because at any given moment they could have done nothing different...the fact that they choose and can learn from their mistakes, is another matter. There's a difference between choice and free choice. Yes I have a choice, yes I have a Will, but how is it 'free'? Quote:Yes. When I am thirsty I can choose to have a glass of water or what I am really thinking a nice cold beer sounds better. In the end I will decide.Yes you choose, yes you decide. Or IOW, your brain does: And...how is that process 'free'? How can you do anything other than what you are doing at any given moment? How could people justly blame you or take revenge on you if you did something wrong, if at the moment you did the hypothetical act - you couldn't have done any different? So can you 'do otherwise' at any given moment or not? And if so...how? I know of no evidence that any of us can...we are not exempt from the natural laws of the universe: We are part of it. We are just doing what we are doing. So yes we have choices: That is totally obvious. Yes we have a Will: This is obvious, we make decisions, we contemplate things, etc...but how is this process 'free'? This is not a debate on whether we have a Will or not, or whether we make Choices or not - it's a debate on whether it's 'free' or not. I believe we make choices, I believe we have Wills. Why? That's a trivial matter to discuss because it's so obvious IMO. What I am discussing is whether our choices, whether our Will is 'free' or not. I don't believe it is. Quote:I can choose to go out tonight or not that is my choice.Of course. That is extremely obvious, people make choices all the time. But is your choice 'free'? Are choices 'free'? Is the Will, 'free'? Quote:And that is your choice, you choose not to believe in free Will. And thats ok. I don't believe that Belief itself is a choice, we are compelled by things. Belief is not a matter of policy, it's not something we choose - like saying "...I think I will have the cheese and onion flavour please..." - but that's a slightly different matter... ...So for sake of argument I will accept and say that yes I do choose to not believe in free Will. But I will say that despite it being a choice, it's not a free one. And whatever I or you 'choose' to believe, won't change the reality of the matter that our choices aren't free, and our Will isn't free. I disbelieve that our Will itself is free, that our choices are free - it's not that I disbelieve that we make choices or have a Will at all, that's undeniably obvious. P.S: I edited my previous post here, I meant to say that I'm a pessimistic incompatabilist not compatabilist. EvF (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Yes. It is simply doing what it is doing, and I am doing what I am doing. So at any given moment that is all I can do, so it doesn't make sense to blame people unless that has a good effect for the future: Because at any given moment they could have done nothing different...the fact that they choose and can learn from their mistakes, is another matter. There's a difference between choice and free choice. Yes I have a choice, yes I have a Will, but how is it 'free'?IMO I don't how our will is free. Here is the wiki definition for free will: Free will raises the question whether, and in what sense, rational agents exercise control over their actions, decisions, choices. Addressing this question requires understanding the relationship between freedom and cause, and determining whether the laws of nature are causally deterministic (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Yes you choose, yes you decide. Or IOW, your brain does: And...how is that process 'free'? How can you do anything other than what you are doing at any given moment? How could people justly blame you or take revenge on you if you did something wrong, if at the moment you did the hypothetical act - you couldn't have done any different?Depends on what they are blamming me on. If I did something wrong and someone was taking revenge on me, I would find out what I had did wrong, and try resolving the issue. I couldn't have done any different (hypothetical act) (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: So can you 'do otherwise' at any given moment or not? And if so...how? I know of no evidence that any of us can...we are not exempt from the natural laws of the universe: We are part of it. We are just doing what we are doing.No I would not do otherwise. Exactly so we are doing what we are doing (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: This is not a debate on whether we have a Will or not, or whether we make Choices or not - it's a debate on whether it's 'free' or not.It is not free (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I believe we make choices, I believe we have Wills. Why? That's a trivial matter to discuss because it's so obvious IMO. What I am discussing is whether our choices, whether our Will is 'free' or not. I don't believe it is.Our choice and our will is not free (October 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: But is your choice 'free'? Are choices 'free'? Is the Will, 'free'?No they are not free
Freedom is the ability to march to the beat of a different drummer without fear of retribution. Secularone
Ignorance is bliss but understanding is wonderful. Atheist forums.org RE: Determinism.....
October 17, 2009 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2009 at 10:29 am by solarwave.)
Arcanus: I think I understand what you mean now, but I dont see how there is any moral responsibility in it.
EvidenceVsFaith: Quantum Theory only applies to the very small but when the very small randomness builds up it is predictable.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible” |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)