http://abcnews.go.com/US/satanic-666-ome...d=18433425

Short story, a guy in Tennessee got a couple of employee ID numbers with the number "666" when he started working with his company a couple of years ago. He specifically complains to his supervisors, they change things up and send him about his way. Now, 2 years later, he's quitting his job because his W-2 also has the number 666 on it and he says he won't do his taxes unless his employeer gives him a new W-2.

Y'know, it's a little disappointing that the employeer is giving him a new W-2; it would be funny as hell to see what happens if he tries that defense when he goes to court for refusal to pay taxes.

I agree that the man is overboard on the 666 thing.

However, I find it ironic that it was posted by a guy who has difficulty getting a job because he likes to dress and act like a woman. Glass houses and all that.

(February 8, 2013 at 8:29 am)John V Wrote: I agree that the man is overboard on the 666 thing.

However, I find it ironic that it was posted by a guy who has difficulty getting a job because he likes to dress and act like a woman. Glass houses and all that.

Wow, fuck you. And on top of it, that isn't even ironic.

(February 8, 2013 at 8:29 am)John V Wrote: I agree that the man is overboard on the 666 thing.

However, I find it ironic that it was posted by a guy who has difficulty getting a job because he likes to dress and act like a woman. Glass houses and all that.

I will gently explain this to you: ad hominem, when you use a [perceived] character flaw to attack the messenger and not the message.

And you can stick your glass houses up where the sun doesn't shine, preferably, shatered broken glass houses.

(February 8, 2013 at 1:50 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I will gently explain this to you: ad hominem, when you use a [perceived] character flaw to attack the messenger and not the message.

Incorrect, as there is no original message to attack. TJ attacked the guy in the clip. I attacked TJ.

(February 8, 2013 at 8:29 am)John V Wrote: However, I find it ironic that it was posted by a guy who has difficulty getting a job because he likes to dress and act like a woman. Glass houses and all that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transvestism ≠ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transsexualism

Tara would have intense difficulty getting a job if she tried to act and dress like a man. This is because she's a gal... I suggest that you stop talking about glass houses and head to your local optometrist: you need eyeglasses.

(February 8, 2013 at 8:29 am)John V Wrote: I agree that the man is overboard on the 666 thing.

However, I find it ironic that it was posted by a guy who has difficulty getting a job because he likes to dress and act like a woman. Glass houses and all that.

Have you ever considered changing your name to Dick? You'd wear it well.

(February 8, 2013 at 2:37 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Have you ever considered changing your name to Dick? You'd wear it well.

Don't be ridiculous... he's too pretty for that. We can call him Cunt

And now he doesn't have to explain his otherwise homosexual tendencies!

(February 8, 2013 at 2:04 pm)John V Wrote:

(February 8, 2013 at 1:50 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I will gently explain this to you: ad hominem, when you use a [perceived] character flaw to attack the messenger and not the message.

Incorrect, as there is no original message to attack. TJ attacked the guy in the clip. I attacked TJ.

It was still uncalled for and a personal attack. TJ did absolutely nothing to justify your words.