(May 26, 2013 at 7:01 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:

---

(May 25, 2013 at 8:09 am)Dragonetti Wrote: Oh, this is coming from a person/thing reading a text written in 700AD. Which most of the stories stolen from another religious text written even earlier. Which all precludes to this imaginary super being. The being is not powerful enough to stop world hunger, eradicate evil, stop his/her/it's feeling from being hurt, and stop sickness. That is sure one not so powerful being.

I know that you can't wait, I'll give you some challenges to replicate some miracles in Quran, then we will see.

Quote:What proof? I do not see picture, data, and new formulas. What does human desires have to do with this? You have the desire to prove your own god in a backhanded way. WOW! Everything you post has been refuted, but you are so blind by your own religion convictions.

By the way my proof is not based on Islam at all,
and many famous Muslim scholar claimed that it is impossible to prove God with no reference to religion.

---

I will be waiting for my 72 virgins!

(May 23, 2013 at 8:27 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:

(May 23, 2013 at 6:15 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: We share 58% of our genome with bananas, believe it or not.

So what are the possible implications of that, what was the point in quoting that finding... bananas and humans share the same ancestor? One of the first few cells split and one of them gave rise to living cells the other one a plant-type thing? I'm not an expert on Biology, unlike in Physics. But what I do know is that if you came up to me in the street and said I shared something with a banana, I'd punch you in the face.

So not only are you ignorant, but you are violent too. Simply fucking lovely. Well just as an FYI plants and animals diverged sometime around 1.5 to 1.65 billion years ago. So no it wasn’t one of the first few cells. Life had already been present on Earth for at least 1.5 billion years by that time. 

Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi

---

(May 23, 2013 at 8:44 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:

(May 23, 2013 at 8:13 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: 1. No.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. Yes.
5. No.

Never heard of a Liger? Lions and Tigers can successfully interbreed.

If that was directed at me then that is what I said. He wanted to know if we could refute the statement "lions can not make a hybrid with a tiger." I can refute that because lions and tigers can make hybrids. They had a tigon at the Memphis zoo back in the 60's. It was one of my favorites.

Looks like no nobel prize for MS

Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though.

i think that as evolution occurs over millenia and millions of years, it's difficult (duh, impossible lol..) for any human to monitor how morphological/physiological changes can help exploit environmental niches.

evolution is not like the theory of gravity. granted, we don't know what causes gravity. however, we can describe its existence and effects well enough.

(May 27, 2013 at 10:49 am)dazzn Wrote: Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though.

i think that as evolution occurs over millenia and millions of years, it's difficult (duh, impossible lol..) for any human to monitor how morphological/physiological changes can help exploit environmental niches.

evolution is not like the theory of gravity. granted, we don't know what causes gravity. however, we can describe its existence and effects well enough.

In fact evolution is much better understood than gravity. Evolution is better defined.

We know that gravity happens but what it is is far from settled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative...relativity

(May 27, 2013 at 10:49 am)dazzn Wrote: Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though.

i think that as evolution occurs over millenia and millions of years, it's difficult (duh, impossible lol..) for any human to monitor how morphological/physiological changes can help exploit environmental niches.

Oh, it's entirely observable, if you look in the right places. Bacteria, for example. Hell, even the various breeds of dog count in that regard. Wouldn't have gotten the variation we see today without evolution.

Hell, just google "silver fox experiment" to see a fairly stark example. All evolution deniers have now are bald assertions.

dog breeds are just like human races. german sherperds, pitbulls, chiauhauas and yorkshire terriers are all the same species, just as blacks and whites comprise the same species with minimal genetic difference. how is that evolution?

You really don't know what evolution is, huh?

yes, mutations over time enable organisms to exploit niches.

(May 27, 2013 at 11:35 am)Psykhronic Wrote: You really don't know what evolution is, huh?

No more than most theist spammers. It is just looking for position from which to claim evolution but then twist it in such a way as to draw it into question. Its act is getting tiresome.