Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report!
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report!
Refuting Evolution
|
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report! RE: Refuting Evolution
May 27, 2013 at 2:05 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2013 at 2:16 am by popeyespappy.)
(May 23, 2013 at 8:27 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:So not only are you ignorant, but you are violent too. Simply fucking lovely. Well just as an FYI plants and animals diverged sometime around 1.5 to 1.65 billion years ago. So no it wasn’t one of the first few cells. Life had already been present on Earth for at least 1.5 billion years by that time.(May 23, 2013 at 6:15 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: We share 58% of our genome with bananas, believe it or not.So what are the possible implications of that, what was the point in quoting that finding... bananas and humans share the same ancestor? One of the first few cells split and one of them gave rise to living cells the other one a plant-type thing? I'm not an expert on Biology, unlike in Physics. But what I do know is that if you came up to me in the street and said I shared something with a banana, I'd punch you in the face. Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi (May 23, 2013 at 8:44 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:If that was directed at me then that is what I said. He wanted to know if we could refute the statement "lions can not make a hybrid with a tiger." I can refute that because lions and tigers can make hybrids. They had a tigon at the Memphis zoo back in the 60's. It was one of my favorites.(May 23, 2013 at 8:13 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: 1. No.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
Looks like no nobel prize for MS
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though.
i think that as evolution occurs over millenia and millions of years, it's difficult (duh, impossible lol..) for any human to monitor how morphological/physiological changes can help exploit environmental niches. evolution is not like the theory of gravity. granted, we don't know what causes gravity. however, we can describe its existence and effects well enough. (May 27, 2013 at 10:49 am)dazzn Wrote: Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though. In fact evolution is much better understood than gravity. Evolution is better defined. We know that gravity happens but what it is is far from settled. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative...relativity You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis. (May 27, 2013 at 10:49 am)dazzn Wrote: Evolution is not observable. this doesn't mean it's false though. Oh, it's entirely observable, if you look in the right places. Bacteria, for example. Hell, even the various breeds of dog count in that regard. Wouldn't have gotten the variation we see today without evolution. Hell, just google "silver fox experiment" to see a fairly stark example. All evolution deniers have now are bald assertions.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
dog breeds are just like human races. german sherperds, pitbulls, chiauhauas and yorkshire terriers are all the same species, just as blacks and whites comprise the same species with minimal genetic difference. how is that evolution?
You really don't know what evolution is, huh?
yes, mutations over time enable organisms to exploit niches.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. | Mystic | 59 | 32381 |
April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
Refuting Creationist Claims Part II: Flood-Related Beliefs | RonaldReagansGhost666 | 7 | 3919 |
February 26, 2013 at 7:30 pm Last Post: Cyberman |
|
Refuting Creationist Claims - Part 1: Noah's Ark | RonaldReagansGhost666 | 23 | 11635 |
February 13, 2013 at 6:27 am Last Post: Zen Badger |
|
Need some help refuting this creation argument... | DaveSumm | 25 | 10804 |
January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am Last Post: Aractus |