the prize for answering this question is to prove that atheism is not as dogmatic as religion and that you are not a hypocrite.

Bon chance!

TROLOLOLOLAAAAAWLZOAR

Calling it now

cant handle the question uh?

---

hint:

I don't _ _ _ _

If someone knows the answer, better get a day off from your work to receive Nobel Prize.

exactly so it's safe to say that humanity doesn't have that answer yet?

atheism = dogmatic = religion = hypocrisy, can we all just get along now and take off all of our clothes?

What is an "organic life form" in the context of this question?
Is a self replicating carbon based molecule an "organic life form"?
Or is it just when you have DNA... or simply RNA?

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/201...ecule.html

(July 19, 2013 at 7:17 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: the prize for answering this question is to prove that atheism is not as dogmatic as religion and that you are not a hypocrite.

Bon chance!

Atheism is a lack of belief in god (I wonder how many times this has been typed on this forum)

So if you have no belief in god this doesn't mean you automatically gain the knowledge of when the first inorganic life form became organic or that you even believe inorganic life forms became organic. You could have no opinion on the matter at all and still be an atheist.

you still didn't answer the question..

ill give another hint

I _ _ _ _ know

---

(July 19, 2013 at 7:40 pm)pocaracas Wrote: What is an "organic life form" in the context of this question?
Is a self replicating carbon based molecule an "organic life form"?
Or is it just when you have DNA... or simply RNA?

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/201...ecule.html

im not too sure to be honest i have no idea. wow, that was easy.

(July 19, 2013 at 7:48 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: you still didn't answer the question..

ill give another hint

I _ _ _ _ know

I didn't answer the question because you're asking it in a really obnoxious annoying condescending way, I'm just telling you that it has no direct relation to atheism, someone could say to you something along the lines of "I know abiogenesis is true, fuck you, whatever you believe is false if you don't believe the same thing as me" and it still wouldn't make atheism dogmatic. It could just mean that this person has a dogmatic belief in this one thing. They could actually believe that their god definitely began abiogenesis.

ok lets try this,

'do good unto others' this is a good idea for society, well then you have to classify yourself as a christian what happens then? you adopt all the other beliefs right because they sucked you in with one thing you agree with, what fools you would say, i would say that too.

'i dont believe in a god until there is proof' this is a rational idea so now you have to classify yourself as an atheist and there are many ideas attached to it no different than religion...

it's not that I disagree with either of those statements but why do the sheep of atheism need to call themselves 'atheist'? it's a title, it's a group and there are many ideas attached to it...most are just anti-ideas of religions ideas

"the god delusion" is one example of this and it is no different than the cults of religion

Why can't you just say I am a person who does not believe in god and my definition of reality is progressing as i learn and grow? why do you have to add yourself to the 'atheist' cult?