Translation: "you're wrong, disengage..."

(August 25, 2013 at 1:10 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: Are you ignoring the fact that smax used the word "or" in the OP in relation to what he proposed?

Ummm, no. Show me the requirement of either...

(August 25, 2013 at 1:10 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: They don't have to believe he's a god, but some indeed do. Their evidence is from the claims to Jesus' divinity portrayed in the Gospel of John.

Oh, so it isn't a requirement then,. Why are you arguing again?

(August 25, 2013 at 1:10 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I suppose neither of us are very good at predictions after all.

Yes, I was wrong on the denial part as evidenced by you owning up to the point above but I still detected in your last post fluff and deflection and of course there was no biblical quote, just a paraphrased reference to John.

Dude, that pic should be an ostrich with it's head in the sand, just sayin'.

Devolution.

Right.... When you have nothing to say, post a pic.
I could so be an atheist and none of you would ever know. (I know how to post images too)

You must've been a hit on the playground, catfish. Tell me, did you get into many fights as a kid?

Fluff? Really?
Or is this you conceding that the statement of smax's that I challenged is wrong now?

No, I'm referring to your obvious talent for picking fights where it is unwarranted or arbitrary. Are you going to answer the question or stand there puffing out your little chest?

(August 25, 2013 at 3:13 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: No, I'm referring to your obvious talent for picking fights where it is unwarranted or arbitrary. You going to answer the question or stand there puffing out your little chest?

LOL, you're such a dumbass.

So BadWriter'sParty, have you ever been molested by a religious figure or as a religious figure, have you ever molested anyone?