Your acceptance doesn't matter, I'll quote you anyways.

I find myself astonishingly lacking in concern. I prophesy that every time you do, others will recognise the sheer gulf of the difference between my point and yours.

(September 16, 2013 at 2:21 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I find myself astonishingly lacking in concern. I prophesy that every time you do, others will recognise the sheer gulf of the difference between my point and yours.

Your point and mine huh?

Why don't you do your job and moderate this thread that is dangerously close to breaking the "no calling out" rule?

(September 16, 2013 at 2:27 pm)catfish Wrote:

(September 16, 2013 at 2:21 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I find myself astonishingly lacking in concern. I prophesy that every time you do, others will recognise the sheer gulf of the difference between my point and yours.

Your point and mine huh?

Why don't you do your job and moderate this thread that is dangerously close to breaking the "no calling out" rule?

Why don't you leave the fucking moderation to the fucking staff?

Why don't you tell me how to do my job again, fish? I always appreciate that. Apart from the fact that you have no idea what goes on behind the scenes, that no member of Staff has taken action on that post ought to speak volumes. On the other hand, if you had any issues over that post and didn't report it through the proper channels, you might find it's you in breach of the rules yourself.

Quote:11 Protecting Rule-breakers
If you are aware of a member breaking the rules, you are obligated to report them to the staff, either via the Report System or by sending one of the staff a PM. Protecting rule-breakers (especially sockpuppets of currently banned members) will not be tolerated, and anyone caught doing it will be warned and possibly banned as a result. All instances will be carefully considered by staff to determine if this was willfully done.

(September 16, 2013 at 2:40 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Why don't you tell me how to do my job again, fish? I always appreciate that. Apart from the fact that you have no idea what goes on behind the scenes, that no member of Staff has taken action on that post ought to speak volumes. On the other hand, if you had any issues over that post and didn't report it through the proper channels, you might find it's you in breach of the rules yourself.

Quote:11 Protecting Rule-breakers
If you are aware of a member breaking the rules, you are obligated to report them to the staff, either via the Report System or by sending one of the staff a PM. Protecting rule-breakers (especially sockpuppets of currently banned members) will not be tolerated, and anyone caught doing it will be warned and possibly banned as a result. All instances will be carefully considered by staff to determine if this was willfully done.

Inform me that it's a breach of the rules and I'll report it, mmm'kay?
Right after that, I'll inform you of what a hypocrite you are.

Ignorance is no defence. It's up to you to read the rules. It's also not my fault if you haven't. For the record, they're kept locked away and hidden, under that button labelled rules up at the top there.

(September 16, 2013 at 3:01 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Ignorance is no defence. It's up to you to read the rules. It's also not my fault if you haven't. For the record, they're kept locked away and hidden, under that button labelled rules up at the top there.