(March 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: Since you obstinately refuse to be intellectually honest with me I fail to see why I should give you my time of day.

OMFG!!!

:ROFLOL:

(March 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: You claimed that logic can't disprove god. A ridiculous statement that demonstrates you've failed on a basic level to understand what's required for an existence claim and ignores that god has always been a concept that can't be supported by logic but conversely it can be refuted without evidence.

Yet, against coherent arguments presented against you, you have STILL to produce one logically sound proof of this idea of yours. Like we've already concluded... you failed here... give it up!

(March 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: The only thing I've abandoned mate is the hope of sensible conversation with you.

Too late WC - I bailed first.

(March 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: I AM A LADY

*shudders*

That's your logical rebuttal?

(March 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: Birds and Trees aren't proof of god, the IPU, or any deity for that matter.

Who said they were?

(March 10, 2010 at 4:57 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: OMFG!!!

:ROFLOL:

Thanks for proving my point. I await your next post of well-thought-out BS with eager anticipation. >.>

Watch this already:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo

I saw all three cube movies and I know what is in the cube...

horrible death traps!

fr0d0, i believe i asked you to provide a link.

Thanks.

You ask a lot of things Tav. You also ignore a hell of a lot more.

In this case, why should I wipe you're ass for you?

ooohooohoooh... I do I do. I wanna wipe someone's ass for them.. Should I go through the entire thread or can someone give me an update on the points up for contention and questions unanswered?

(March 11, 2010 at 3:40 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You ask a lot of things Tav. You also ignore a hell of a lot more.

In this case, why should I wipe you're ass for you?

One link to a post where you answered any questions specifically would be nice. I can wipe my own ass.

You constantly move the goalpost Tav. Of course I'm not going to bother to answer your inane requests. This is your methodology for ascertaining truth: Blind denial.

(March 12, 2010 at 2:14 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You constantly move the goalpost Tav. Of course I'm not going to bother to answer your inane requests. This is your methodology for ascertaining truth: Blind denial.

Me moving goalposts = asking you to back up your claims with specific details.

I asked you to elaborate on a number of things, you gave me "42". Cute.

I don't deny anything on the basis that I don't want to. I deny claims because of no evidence and lack of an objectively verifiable explanation.

God just is? He has a nature?

Why is that?
How can you know this to be true?

All I EVER hear from you are vague claims and highly impossible scenarios in which the laws of nature don't apply, but you can still discern intention and nature from a being that is not, NOR NEVER CAN BE verified by scientific means. There are many fallacies used in your arguments and yet you ignore them and continue on your path to ridiculous claims.

You blame me of doing the same thing, but you have yet to elaborate on any points that you consider fallacial. Please get used to backing up your points, or stop entertaining claims that you can't back up with reasoned debate.

You don't get a lot of it Tav, which is't bad. You should retain responsibility for asking reasonable questions, and to ask unreasonably wide questions will do nothing to further your understanding. You seem to deny certain areas of our discussions. Specifically those which would cause you effort and to perhaps see things from another angle. We started out with me pointing out your own heinous fallacies, and you have yet to make counter accusations stick. I backed up my points immediately and you either have a strong blindness or are in denial.