Alex,
Wait a minute, I am gradually coming on stage. I am fully loaded. Please get ready for me.
Wait a minute, I am gradually coming on stage. I am fully loaded. Please get ready for me.
Introducing The Universal Religion
|
Alex,
Wait a minute, I am gradually coming on stage. I am fully loaded. Please get ready for me. (February 2, 2014 at 10:51 am)jideoni charles Wrote: The religion will be a religion of no religion, That makes me think of Enter the Dragon, where Bruce Lee's character tricks a belligerent man by employing a style he called "the art of fighting without fighting." [youtube]xNToJwKE4F0[/youtube]
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (February 10, 2014 at 6:40 am)Sword of Christ Wrote:(February 10, 2014 at 5:49 am)EvolutionKills Wrote: The only things I need are evidence and intellectual honesty. If you have those, you don't need any religion. Sure - anything can be read as evidence for "God", or Santa, or the Tooth Fairy, if you look. The question then becomes: is it convincing evidence? That's where intellectual honesty, critical thinking and the all-important bullshit filter comes in.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(February 10, 2014 at 12:47 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Sure - anything can be read as evidence for "God", or Santa, or the Tooth Fairy, if you look. The question then becomes: is it convincing evidence? That's where intellectual honesty, critical thinking and the all-important bullshit filter comes in. You have to look within, and without as well I mean you have the fine tuning of the universe and the natural constants and that kind of thing as well if you look, and understand what you're looking at. Revelation wise there are different choices there but the Bible has a lot going for it despite some of the flaws you can certainly point out. As long as the source/inspiration for it was God the details and things they may have got wrong about certain things is a little academic, it's not a huge faith destroying deal.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
(February 10, 2014 at 4:50 pm)Alex K Wrote:Amazing how two letters turn an irritating prevarication into a highly disturbing image.(February 10, 2014 at 11:45 am)jideoni charles Wrote: Alex, Thanks for that.
"Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken." Sith code Would it involve less waiting if instead of peace of mind, I was only interested in a piece of ass? (February 11, 2014 at 12:10 am)rasetsu Wrote: Hrm Hrm.... Hi. My name's Mike.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- (February 10, 2014 at 1:25 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote:(February 10, 2014 at 12:47 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Sure - anything can be read as evidence for "God", or Santa, or the Tooth Fairy, if you look. The question then becomes: is it convincing evidence? That's where intellectual honesty, critical thinking and the all-important bullshit filter comes in. Of course it isn't 'faith destroying', because faith doesn't rely on evidence; that's why it's a synonym for 'gullibility'. This is indecently why faith sucks at determining the nature of reality, because in centuries past you'd be the very person who would posit faith in a flat Earth at the center of your god's supposed creation. Having faith in that concept didn't make it any more true, and truth is ultimately what I'm interested it. The absolute best way to determine truth is by the evaluation of evidence, which is precisely what you do not have for your belief; which is why you rely upon faith. Because if you actually had any fucking evidence, you wouldn't need faith; you'd simply rely on the evidence. Faith is unnecessary when you have evidence. We don't need faith to understand and explain gravity, electromagnetism, or to support our belief that the Earth is an ellipsoid; because we have ample evidence to support these propositions. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Universal Religion Cardinal Teachings (1-5) of (32) | jideoni charles | 29 | 6080 |
February 14, 2014 at 9:12 am Last Post: Alex K |
|
Universal Religion Aims And Objectives | jideoni charles | 5 | 1578 |
February 4, 2014 at 6:17 am Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4 |