(April 1, 2014 at 7:11 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:

(April 1, 2014 at 6:16 pm)pocaracas Wrote: when can we see a forum mod that warns people when someone else posts something in between my viewing a thread and my posting of a reply on that thread?

Cthulu has volunteered to help you with that.

Oh, hell yeah - we can absolutely issue warnings for ninjaposting. Bans, too.

(April 1, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:

(April 1, 2014 at 1:38 pm)pocaracas Wrote: If it fails to render a particular page as intended.

Spoken like someone who has never coded a single op in their entire fucking life.

Care to show me a bug-free rendering engine?

No?

That's because they don't exist.

(April 1, 2014 at 1:38 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Did I ever say there weren't?

I'll use your own words:

(April 1, 2014 at 12:05 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I think it's stupid to start using a non-open-source browser when firefox exists and is as good as any other. /snip

You outlined a binary split between "Non-open-source browsers" and "Firefox".

You didn't say:
"I think it's stupid to start using a non-open-source browser when open source alternatives like Firefox exists and is as good as any other."

Nice goal post moving.

(April 1, 2014 at 1:38 pm)pocaracas Wrote: You are correct, but I don't think the developers would do such a thing, given the potential repercussions if it was found out... and it could by found out.. unlike what happens with close-source software.

"I don't think" != "It is assured"

Magical thinking.

And "finding out" requires:

- knowledge of the domain (browsers)

- knowledge of intentional and unintentional side-channel attacks

- lots of time to examime to accumulate a high confidence of security.


The burden of proof is on those to prove a piece of software is reasonable secure. Closed or open source.

Open source may increase the visibility of bugs to be fixed.

As we can see from critical OpenSSL and GnuTLS bugs lately, horrible defects can creep in to plain sight.

That's because Open source is:
"In production and development, open source as a development model promotes a) universal access via free license to a product's design or blueprint, and b) universal redistribution of that design or blueprint, including subsequent improvements to it by anyone."

Nothing in that definition has anything to do with security, defects, etc,. Any benefits there are side effects of it being open.

REF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source

(April 1, 2014 at 1:38 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Indeed I can, but I don't have the time for that. I trust those people who work on it and those who keep a watchful eye and are not finding any glaring security faults...

Once again, it's not assured. It's faith you're using.

I don't have a problem with faith, only people who attempt to deny they have faith in something while indulging in precisely that.

Hypocrisy is a pain in the ass.

(April 1, 2014 at 1:38 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Do you think an institution like Mozilla would risk such a blow to its main product? What would it gain with such a behavior?

Then what is this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecom...ct=Firefox

Bugs are a natural part of the software development cycle. Nearly every single article of software has a bug within it, excepting the few that are formally verified.

(April 1, 2014 at 1:51 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Precisely - and exactly the reason why I've switched back to Internet Explorer. I mean, if you can't trust Microsoft, who can you trust?

That's absurd and you know it.

I'm criticising the assertion that open-source is some kind of totem against software defects.

Nice of you to think that any criticism of "Open Source" really means "Use Closed Source" (It doesn't.)!

(April 1, 2014 at 2:43 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: What are your alternative suggestions?

There are some services that attempt to answer that:

http://alternativeto.net/software/firefo...form=linux

I'd suggest Chromium. I often find myself using ReKonq when I'm developing code for doing quick lookups.

Lmfao!

Fukin brilliant!

Could someone please change my label from posting freak to crazy motherfucker? That's what everyone called me when I got here...matter of fact...that's what they still call me.

Or if you think there is a better label. Posting freak is too generic.

(April 2, 2014 at 3:09 pm)Thunder Cunt Wrote: Could someone please change my label from posting freak to crazy motherfucker? That's what everyone called me when I got here...matter of fact...that's what they still call me.

Or if you think there is a better label. Posting freak is too generic.

You can do it youself, else, I charge 12 milion an hour.

How about changing it to "Rattlesnake Cavern Inspector." :rolls-eyes:

(April 2, 2014 at 3:10 pm)LastPoet Wrote:

(April 2, 2014 at 3:09 pm)Thunder Cunt Wrote: Could someone please change my label from posting freak to crazy motherfucker? That's what everyone called me when I got here...matter of fact...that's what they still call me.

Or if you think there is a better label. Posting freak is too generic.

You can do it youself, else, I charge 12 milion an hour.

How much per minute. one sixtiety of 12 million? :p

How do I change it. I don't see something to click on that says change your whatever the fuck they call it.

---

(April 2, 2014 at 3:15 pm)rasetsu Wrote: How about changing it to "Rattlesnake Cavern Inspector." :rolls-eyes:

That was so appropriate. Thanks babe!

I'd tip my hat to ya but since I don't have a hat on atm:

(April 2, 2014 at 3:15 pm)Thunder Cunt Wrote: How do I change it. I don't see something to click on that says change your whatever the fuck they call it.

User CP [top right] > edit profile [left middle] > Custom User Title [top right]

Gee thanks!

So how long does it take for a troll to become a mod through the process of natural selection?

46,789 generations.

---

You've got a long way to go.